OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data OA All Versions of this Article: 145/1/98    most recent pp.107.102079v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cai, X. Articles by Wu, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cai, X. Articles by Wu, Y. Agricola Articles by Cai, X. Articles by Wu, Y.

DEVELOPMENT AND HORMONE ACTION

A Putative CCAAT-Binding Transcription Factor Is a Regulator of Flowering Timing in Arabidopsis^{1,[C],[W],[OA]}

Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate (X.C., J.B., S.E., E.D., M.L., Y.W.), Center for Integrated BioSystems (D.C.), and Department of Biology (D.D.), Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322; Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 (J.K., T.Z.); and Diversa Corporation, San Diego, California 92121 (J.K.)

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
Flowering at the appropriate time of year is essential for successful reproduction in plants. We found that HAP3b in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a putative CCAAT-binding transcription factor gene, is involved in controlling flowering time. Overexpression of HAP3b promotes early flowering while hap3b, a null mutant of HAP3b, is delayed in flowering under a long-day photoperiod. Under short-day conditions, however, hap3b did not show a delayed flowering compared to wild type based on the leaf number, suggesting that HAP3b may normally be involved in the photoperiod-regulated flowering pathway. Mutant hap3b plants showed earlier flowering upon gibberellic acid or vernalization treatment, which means that HAP3b is not involved in flowering promoted by gibberellin or vernalization. Further transcript profiling and gene expression analysis suggests that HAP3b can promote flowering by enhancing expression of key flowering time genes such as FLOWERING LOCUS T and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1. Our results provide strong evidence supporting a role of HAP3b in regulating flowering in plants grown under long-day conditions.

Recent studies indicated that several members in a large transcription factor family called HEME ACTIVATOR PROTEIN (HAP) are involved in regulating flowering timing. HAP in plants encodes a putative CCAAT-binding transcription factor similar to HAP or NUCLEAR FACTOR-Y (NF-Y) in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and vertebrate (Lotan et al., 1998; Mantovani, 1999). In yeast and mammalian systems, it is known that HAPs form a complex and regulate gene expression. The complex forms through an initial interaction between HAP3 and HAP5, which then allows the formation of a heterotrimer with HAP2. The heterotrimer then binds to a CCAAT element with very high specificity and affinity (Romier et al., 2003). There is seemingly only one gene for each HAP factor in yeast and animals (Mantovani, 1999). In plants, however, these factors are all encoded in a gene family (Edwards et al., 1998; Yang et al., 2005). There are at least 10 annotated members in each family in Arabidopsis and also multiple members in each HAP family in rice (Oryza sativa; Kwong et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2005). To distinguish different members in the same family in Arabidopsis, each member is labeled alphabetically. For instance, in the HAP3 family, At2g38880 is named as HAP3a, and At5g47640 as HAP3b (Wenkel et al., 2006).

Several HAP members have been studied in plants. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1) encodes a HAP3 in Arabidopsis. Mutant lec1 is defective in embryo development during the seed development stage, causing a leafy cotyledon phenotype. Ectopically overexpressing LEC1 can induce embryo development in vegetative cells (Lotan et al., 1998). Recently, another HAP3 (L1L or LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE) that is closely related to LEC1 was also found to be involved in embryo development (Kwong et al., 2003). In rice, an OsHAP3 is involved in chloroplast biogenesis. Suppression of gene expression of OsHAP3 using RNAi reduced expression of the gene and affected chlorophyll and chloroplast development (Miyoshi et al., 2003). Several HAPs appear to be involved in blue light and abscisic acid signaling (Warpeha et al., 2007).

In regulating flowering timing, Ben-Naim et al. (2006) reported that overexpression of a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) HAP5a in Arabidopsis caused early flowering (Ben-Naim et al., 2006). However, overexpression of Arabidopsis HAP3a and HAP5a delayed flowering (Wenkel et al., 2006). These conflicting results from overexpression hinder a clear conclusion for the roles of these HAPs in controlling flowering timing due to lack of supporting evidence from loss-of-function mutants. In this study, we provide evidence from both loss-of-function mutant and overexpression plants to support the role of HAP3b in controlling flowering. Up-regulation of HAP3b promotes early flowering, whereas a hap3b knockout results in delayed flowering in a long-day photoperiod.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 

Altered Flowering Timing in Mutant hap3b and HAP3b-Overexpression Plants

A genetic approach was taken to examine the role of a group of HAP in plant growth/development and response to stress. Among the insertional mutants identified from the SALK T-DNA insertion collection (http://signal.salk.edu), an insertion mutant for HAP3b showed delayed flowering phenotype compared to its wild-type plants grown at a long-day (16-h/8-h light/dark) photoperiod (Fig. 1, A and D ). The mutant plants developed on average about four more leaves than wild-type plants before flowering (i.e. about a 33% delay that equals approximately 7 d). The hap3b mutant (SALK_025666) has a T-DNA insertion at 9 bp after the first ATG (Fig. 1B) and no full-length transcript was detected using reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, suggesting a loss-of-function mutation (Fig. 1C). A null mutation was further confirmed by the microarray data (see below), which showed no evidence for the accumulation of a truncated HAP3b transcript.

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 1. Delayed flowering in hap3b mutants and early flowering in HAP3b-overexpression plants grown under a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod. A, Delayed flowering in hap3b. B, hap3b has a T-DNA insertion at 9 bp after the first ATG. C, No transcript was detected in hap3b using RT-PCR using two independent plants; there is no intron in HAP3b and the PCR products are the same when using genomic DNA as a template (gDNA). D, hap3b developed more leaves before flowering compared with wild-type plants (wt); overexpression plants (Pactin:HAP3b in wild-type background) flowered earlier with fewer leaves compared with control plants (C1: Pactin:GUS in wild-type background). The data are means ± SE (n = approximately 30) from three independent experiments. **, Indicates P < 0.001 compared with wild type.

Not only did the HAP3b-GFP-overexpression lines show a reversal of the hap3b mutant phenotype, they also provided evidence that the up-regulation of the HAP3b gene could promote premature flowering (Supplemental Fig. S1). An overexpression of HAP3b in wild-type plants promotes early flowering even more. As shown in Figure 1D, a representative HAP3b-overexpression line (P_actin:HAP3b) from the five lines characterized reached flowering with four leaves less (Fig. 1D) than the control plants that were overexpressing a GUS gene (C1).

The predicted HAP3b protein (191 amino acid) consists of three domains (Lee et al., 2003). The central domain, comprised of more than 90 amino acids, showed significant sequence identity with HAP3 or subunit B of NF-Y in yeast and rat that is required for DNA binding and interactions with other HAP proteins (Lee et al., 2003). A HAP3b-GFP fusion protein was predominately localized in nuclei of leaf (Fig. 2A ) and root (Fig. 2B) cells, consistent with HAP3b's predicted role as a transcription factor.

View larger version (69K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 2. Localization of HAP3b in nuclei using GFP as a reporter gene: leaf epidermal cells (A) and root tip cells (B).

Effect of Photoperiod, GA, and Vernalization on Flowering Timing of hap3b

Many genes are known to regulate flowering timing through their activity in four major pathways, i.e. photoperiod, vernalization, GA, and autonomous pathways. To understand whether HAP3b is related to these known pathways, wild-type, hap3b, and HAP3b-overexpression plants were grown under different photoperiods, treated with gibberellic acid, and subjected to vernalization.

Mutant hap3b, wild-type, HAP3b-overexpression, and overexpression control plants (C1) were sprayed with 20 µM GA. Both mutant hap3b and wild-type plants flowered earlier (with fewer rosette leaves) compared to their non-GA-treatment controls (Fig. 3A ). HAP3b-overexpression plants did not show earlier flowering in response to GA. It is probable that the HAP3b-overexpression plants flowered so early that it masked any potential flower promoting effect from GA. Since the hap3b mutation did not affect a GA response, HAP3b is not involved in GA-induced flowering pathway.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 3. Flower timing assays showing that HAP3b function is restricted to modifying a long-day photoperiod flowering timing pathway. A and B show that the hap3b mutants delay in flowering (under long-day conditions) is not reversed by GA (A) or vernalization (B), whereas mutant hap3b and wild-type plants grown under a short-day photoperiod show no differences. *, Indicates P < 0.01; **, indicates P < 0.001 compared with minus GA control (A) or minus vernalization control (B) or wild type (C).

In contrast to the flowering phenotype demonstrated under long-day photoperiod conditions (Fig. 2D), hap3b and overexpression plants flowered with the same leaf number as their respective controls under a short-day photoperiod (16-h dark/8-h light; Fig. 3C). However, HAP3b-overexpression plants flowered significantly earlier when compared with the regular wild-type control. These phenotypes resemble those of gi and co mutants in the photoperiod pathway.

Transcript Profiling of hap3b and HAP3b-Overexpression Plants Using Microarray

To identify potential candidate genes that are affected by HAP3b, a microarray experiment using the Arabidopsis whole genome array (Affymetrix ATH1 chip) was carried out with hap3b knockout and HAP3b-overexpression plants. The arrays were used here as a discovery tool, with significant changes independently confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. To identify potentially important changes, we grouped genes that show an opposite response (at least 25% change in gene expression level based on mean values of signal intensity) in hap3b and HAP3b-overexpression plants in comparison with wild-type plants. We identified 15 candidate genes that were down-regulated in hap3b but up-regulated in overexpression plants (Table I ). The transcript level of HAP3b showed the greatest increase (approximately 38-fold) in the overexpression plants and was not detected in hap3b, as expected.

Also in the list (Table I) are a putative cell wall protein gene (At2g20870), a putative cytochrome P450 gene (At3g10570), and a GDSL-motif lipase/hydrolase family protein gene (At5g33370), which all showed expression predominantly in floral organs. A vegetative storage protein 1 gene (At5g24780), a jacalin lectin family protein gene (At2g39330), and a UDP-Glc 4-epimerase gene (At1g12780) were expressed at the highest level in floral organs as well as in stem apex or cauline leaves (the Genevestigator database). These results suggest that the majority of the genes affected by HAP3b in the list are involved in reproductive growth.

Several major flowering genes were selected for quantitative PCR analysis. SOC1 was up-regulated in overexpression plants and down-regulated in hap3b, confirming the expression pattern in the array analysis. FT that was not detected on the array in wild-type and mutant plants was detected by quantitative PCR and showed the same pattern as SOC1 (Fig. 4 ). This supports a model in which HAP3b normally promotes flowering through a pathway involving the up-regulation of SOC1 and FT. Expression levels of other major flowering-related genes, TIMING OF CAB1 (TOC1), CO, and FLC, were not significantly affected (Supplemental Fig. S3).

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 4. SOC1 (A) and FT (B) genes were down-regulated in hap3b but up-regulated in HAP3b-overexpression plants. The transcript level of each gene was determined using a qPCR method and was then normalized with the transcript level of ACT2. The fold-change was calculated by dividing the normalized transcript level of hap3b by that of wild-type plants (wt) or the normalized transcript level of overexpression plants (Pactin:HAP3b) by that of C1 (Pactin:GUS) plants. The data are means ± SE of three independent experiments. The pattern was reproducible in each experiment.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

HAP3b Regulates Flower Timing through a Photoperiod Pathway

Evidence presented here from hap3b mutants and HAP3b overexpression clearly shows that HAP3b contributes to the regulation of flower timing under long-day photoperiod conditions. We found no evidence to link HAP3b to flower timing under short-day conditions. Similar long-day specific phenotypes have also been observed for co and gi mutants, which are the key players in the photoperiod pathway. Since hap3b plants show a normal response to GA and vernalization treatments, the results exclude a role of HAP3b in the GA and the vernalization flowering pathways. An involvement of HAP3b in the autonomous pathway is also unlikely, since the FLC transcript level, which is up-regulated in the mutants of the autonomous pathway (Mockler et al., 2004), is not affected in the hap3b plants. Our other analyses on the hap3b plants did not reveal other visible phenotypes related to morphology and development (data not shown). The combined results suggest the stress-modifying function of HAP3b is probably restricted to regulating flowering in the long-day photoperiod pathway. A recent study demonstrated that HAP3b can directly interact with CO and COL15 in the yeast two-hybrid analysis (Wenkel et al., 2006). Thus, HAP3b may promote early flowering in the long-day photoperiod by affecting activity of CO or COL proteins.

Many HAPs in Arabidopsis are found to interact with CO or COL and overexpression of HAP3a and HAP5a has been shown to delay flowering (Wenkel et al., 2006), implicating complexity of regulation in the photoperiod pathway. However, loss of function of HAP3a did not affect flowering timing. The role of HAPs in controlling flowering timing is further complicated when a tomato HAP5 promotes flowering when overexpressed in Arabidopsis (Ben-Naim et al., 2006). Thus the significance of these HAPs in controlling flowering timing requires further study. Our results provide clear genetic evidence to show HAP is indeed involved in control of flowering time and HAP3b plays a critical role in regulating flowering timing in the long-day photoperiod pathway.

Model for HAP3b Mode of Action

In yeast and animal systems, HAPs form a heterotetramer or heterotrimer for transcription activation. Wenkel et al. (2006) showed that HAP3a and HAP5a in Arabidopsis were able to interact in vivo. Thus, it is very possible that HAPs in plants work in a similar way in animal and yeast, i.e. by forming a HAP complex during transcription activation. However, a binding of plant HAP complex to the CCAAT element has not been demonstrated. Plant promoters don't have a consistent location for CCAAT elements (Lotan et al., 1998; Wenkel et al., 2006). In animals, HAPs regulated genes usually have a CCAAT box located at the –60 to –100 location in the promoter (Mantovani, 1998). Our analysis of the top approximately 20 HAP3b-affected genes from the array experiment also showed a random pattern of CCAAT distribution in the promoters, even though a majority of these genes have one or two CCAAT boxes within –1 to –500 bp (data not shown). Thus, HAPs in plants may bind to an element or sequence that differs from CCAAT.

Overexpression of HAP3a and HAP3b, two members in the same family, resulted in opposite results in flowering timing control, raising an interesting question of how these different HAP3s achieve an opposite effect. One of the possibilities is that HAP3a and HAP3b form different complexes with their own HAP5 and HAP2 so that the complexes function differently. Alternatively, HAP3a and HAP3b form of a complex involving the same HAP5 and HAP2, since they both can interact with CO and COL in the yeast two-hybrid system. In this case, a competition of HAP3a with HAP3b for binding CO will decrease the number of CO-HAP3b-containing complexes and delay flowering. Thus, a fine balance of HAP3a and HAP3b will determine the flowering timing in plants, which may represent a novel mechanism in regulating flowering timing in the photoperiod pathway.

In conclusion, our results provide strong genetic evidence supporting a model in which HAP3b play a role in regulating flowering in plants grown under long-day conditions (Fig. 5 ). The promotion of flowering is achieved probably through an interaction with CO or COL proteins. However, an interaction of CO/COL with HAP3b in vivo needs to be demonstrated. Interestingly, HAP3b shows a very similar expression pattern, with one of the highest levels in leaf vascular tissues (Supplemental Fig. S2; also see the Genevestigator database) to CO (An et al., 2004). Since CO is known to activate FT expression mainly in the leaf phloem companion cells (Takada and Goto, 2003; An et al., 2004), the colocalization of CO and HAP3b may be required for the interaction of these two proteins that will further activate expression of FT or other genes identified in Table I from the array analysis. It needs to be mentioned that some genes such as At2g20870 and At3g10570 that are down-regulated in hap3b in Table I are also down-regulated in ft mutants, while others such as At2g39330 and At1g12780 that are down-regulated in hap3b mutants are not affected in ft mutants (the Genevestigator database). Thus, some of the genes affected by the hap3b mutation in Table I are potentially regulated through FT while some may be regulated by HAP3b in a different mechanism. Future work also is needed to address whether or which HAP2/HAP5 are involved in forming a HAP complex with HAP3b to regulate flowering in vivo. Since several environmental stresses up-regulate HAP3b, these results raise a possibility that HAP3b provides a pathway by which abiotic stress-response pathways may help promote early flowering.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window] [as a PowerPoint slide]   Figure 5. A proposed model for how HAP3b expression can promote early flowering. [See online article for color version of this figure.]

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

Seeds of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Columbia-0 ecotype background, either wild-type, mutant, or overexpression transgenic plants) were sown in well-watered potting mix (Enriched Potting Mix, Miracle-Gro Lawn Products) and kept in a cold room (4°C) for 2 d. Seeds were germinated and seedlings were grown on a light shelf or in a growth chamber under a 16-h/8-h light/dark cycle, except for the short-day photoperiod experiments. Light was supplied by cool-white florescent bulbs, reaching an intensity of approximately 120 µmol m^–2 s^–1 on the surface of the shelf. For some experiments, seedlings were cultured in a square petri dish (10 x 10 x 1.5 cm³) containing 35 mL of sterile solid medium consisting of 0.5x Murashige and Skoog salt, 0.5% Suc, 10 mM MES, and 0.6% Phytagel (Sigma) at pH 5.8. Seeds were first surface sterilized and arranged on the surface of the solid medium and were given a cold treatment at 4°C for 48 to 72 h. Plants were grown in a growth chamber under the conditions described above.

The T-DNA insertion mutant lines (Alonso et al., 2003) of At5g47640, SALK_025666, SALK_105662, and SALK_105664, in the Columbia-0 ecotype background were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center stock center at Ohio State University. Insertion mutant information was obtained from the SIGnAL Web site at http://signal.salk.edu and verified by PCR and RT-PCR methods. Only SALK_025666 was confirmed as a true insertional mutant.

Plasmid Constructs and Plant Transformation

The promoter (1.5 kb before 5' untranslated region [UTR]) or the transcribed portion including 5' UTR and 3' UTR of HAP3b were PCR amplified from Arabidopsis genomic DNA separately and cloned into the Zero Blunt PCR Cloning vector (Invitrogen). All PCR amplifications were carried out with high-fidelity DNA polymerase (PfuUltra DNA polymerase, Stratagene). The sequence of the cloned promoter or transcribed portion was verified by DNA sequencing and subcloned into modified pBI121 binary vectors. For promoter analysis, the promoter was subcloned into pBI121 to drive expression of a uidA or GUS gene (P_HAP3b:GUS). For the overexpression experiments (P_actin:HAP3b), the promoter of ACT2 (At3g18780) was used to drive expression of HAP3b cDNA. The ACT2 promoter was also used to drive GUS expression (C1, P_actin:GUS) as a control for overexpression plants. For making HAP3b-GFP fusion protein (P_35S:HAP3b-GFP), HAP3b was cloned with the stop codon removed and fused to GFP in frame at the N terminus of the GFP protein. The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter is used to drive the expression of the fusion protein. Plants were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens using the floral dipping method (Clough and Bent, 1998). The transformants were selected on agar plates containing 30 µg/mL basta or kanamycin and verified using PCR with construct-specific primers. All the overexpression plants (P_actin:HAP3b, P_actin:GUS, P_35S:HAP3b-GFP) were selected for two more generations and homozygous transgenic plants (T3) were used for further characterization.

GUS Staining and GFP Localization

T1 and T2 transgenic plants carrying the P_HAP3b:GUS construct were assayed for GUS color reaction following a method described by Stangeland and Salehian (2002). For HAP3b-GFP localization, roots and leaves of young seedlings were used for examination using a laser-scanning confocal microscope (Bio-Rad MRC 1024).

Genomic DNA Extraction and T-DNA Insertional Mutant Screening

Homozygous T-DNA insertional mutants were identified by following the protocol described at the SALK Insertion Sequence Database (http://signal.salk.edu/tabout.html) using a PCR method. Leaf tissues of soil-grown seedlings were first collected from individual plants. Genomic DNA was extracted using a quick cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide method (Rogers and Bendich, 1988) and used for PCR reactions with the primers recommended in the SALK protocol.

Flowering Time

Seeds of wild-type, hap3b mutant, HAP3b-overexpression transgenic plants (P_actin:HAP3b), and overexpression control plants (C1: P_actin:GUS) were germinated in the same flat containing well-watered potting mix. After 2-d cold treatment, plants were grown under different conditions until flowering. The rosette leaf numbers were counted after all the plants flowered (Koornneef et al., 1991). For the long-day experiment, plants were grown under a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod. For the short-day experiment, plants were grown under a 16-h/8-h dark/light photoperiod. The entire plant of 15-d-old seedlings grown in petri dishes or leaf tissue of 18-d-old soil-grown plants was harvested for gene expression analysis. For GA₃ treatment, the plants were separated into control and GA treatment groups when approximately 4 to 5 leaves were emerged. Leaf number was counted and the GA treatment plants were sprayed with 20 µM GA₃ twice a week. Five applications of GA were performed (Lim et al., 2004). For vernalization treatment, seeds were germinated on Phytagel plates and kept in a cold room (4°C) in the dark for various amounts of time (30 and 2 d). Seedlings were then taken out, transplanted to soil, and grown under a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod until flowering (Mockler et al., 2004).

Microarray and Gene Expression

Seeds of wild-type, hap3b mutant, and HAP3b-overexpression transgenic plants were germinated in the same flat containing well-watered potting mix. Leaves of 18-d-old plants grown in soil under a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod were harvested 6 h after lights were on. RNA was extracted using Tri-reagent (Ambion). The array labeling, hybridization, scanning, and initial data processing were conducted as a service by the Center of Integrated BioSystems at Utah State University. A total of five arrays (Affymetrix ATH1 chip, catalog no. 900385) were processed: two chips for wild-type plants, two for mutant plants (hap3b), and one for overexpression plants (P_actin:HAP3b). RNA used for the chip experiment was from five independent biological samples from two independent experiments. Each sample represented a collection of leaves from 12 plants.

To confirm expression of selected genes from the microarray experiments using a quantitative PCR, seeds of wild-type, hap3b mutant, HAP3b-overexpression transgenic plants, and overexpression control plants (C1 = P_actin:GUS) were germinated in a single Murashige and Skoog-Phytagel plate. Fifteen-day-old seedlings were harvested for RNA extraction. A quantitative PCR method was performed by following a method described by Wang et al. (2003) with the following modifications. Quantitation of the transcript level was first normalized with values from an actin gene (ACT2). The normalized transcript levels in hap3b or HAP3b-overexpression plants were then divided by that of their corresponding wild-type or C1 plants to obtain fold-change.

Primers

The primers used for cloning HAP3b and the promoter, and for mutant screening and gene expression are listed in Supplemental Table S3. Most of the gene-specific primers for expression study were located in exons flanking an intron. The resulting PCR products were larger if genomic DNA was present in cDNA samples.

Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed at least three times. A standard t test was used to determine significance with a 95% confidence interval. P values reported are two-tailed analyses.

Supplemental Data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article.

Supplemental Figure S1. Altered flowering time in hap3b and promotion of flowering in hap3b plants that were transformed with P_35S:HAP3b-GFP construct.

Supplemental Figure S2. Tissue localization of HAP3b expression.

Supplemental Figure S3. Change in transcript level of TOC1 (A), CO (B), and FLC (C) genes in hap3b and overexpression plants.

Supplemental Table S1. Increase in HAP3b transcript level under stress.

Supplemental Table S2. Change in transcript level of genes known to be associated with flowering time control in hap3b and HAP3b-overexpression (ox = P_actin:HAP3b) plants grown under normal growth conditions.

Supplemental Table S3. Primers for cloning and gene expression.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Joe Shope for excellent assistance on the confocal microscope and the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center for providing the insertional mutant seeds.

Received May 8, 2007; accepted July 5, 2007; published July 13, 2007.

	FOOTNOTES

 
¹ This work was supported by the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station (project no. UTA00366), a research grant from Syngenta, a Community/University Research Initiative grant from Utah State University (to Y.W.), and a special grant from the Office of the Vice President for Research at Utah State University for sponsoring the microarray analysis. This is contribution number 7900 from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station journal series.

² These authors contribute equally to the article.

The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantphysiol.org) is: Yajun Wu (yajun.wu{at}usu.edu).

^[C] Some figures in this article are displayed in color online but in black and white in the print edition.

^[W] The online version of this article contains Web-only data.

^[OA] Open Access articles can be viewed online without a subscription.

www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.107.102079

^* Corresponding author; e-mail yajun.wu{at}usu.edu.

	LITERATURE CITED

TOP ABSTRACT RESULTS DISCUSSION MATERIALS AND METHODS LITERATURE CITED

 
Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen HM, Shinn P, Stevenson DK, Zimmerman J, Barajas P, Cheuk R, et al (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Amasino RM (2005) Vernalization and flowering time. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16: 154–158[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

An HL, Roussot C, Suarez-Lopez P, Corbesler L, Vincent C, Pineiro M, Hepworth S, Mouradov A, Justin S, Turnbull C, et al (2004) CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development 131: 3615–3626[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ben-Naim O, Eshed R, Parnis A, Teper-Bamnolker P, Shalit A, Coupland G, Samach A, Lifschitz E (2006) The CCAAT binding factor can mediate interactions between CONSTANS-like proteins and DNA. Plant J 46: 462–476[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cardon GH, Hohmann S, Nettesheim K, Saedler H, Huijser P (1997) Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP-box gene SPL3: a novel gene involved in the floral transition. Plant J 12: 367–377[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735–743[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Edwards D, Murray JAH, Smith AG (1998) Multiple genes encoding the conserved CCAAT-box transcription factor complex are expressed in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 117: 1015–1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koornneef M, Hanhart CJ, Vanderveen JH (1991) A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 229: 57–66[ISI][Medline]

Kreps JA, Wu Y, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper JF (2002) Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol 130: 2129–2141[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kwong RW, Bui AQ, Lee H, Kwong LW, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2003) LEAFY COTYLEDON1-LIKE defines a class of regulators essential for embryo development. Plant Cell 15: 5–18[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee HS, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (2003) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 represents a functionally specialized subunit of the CCAAT binding transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 2152–2156[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lim MH, Kim J, Kim YS, Chung KS, Seo YH, Lee I, Kim J, Hong CB, Kim HJ, Park CM (2004) A new Arabidopsis gene, FLK, encodes an RNA binding protein with K homology motifs and regulates flowering time via FLOWERING LOCUS C. Plant Cell 16: 731–740[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lotan T, Ohto M, Yee KM, West MAL, Lo R, Kwong RW, Yamagishi K, Fischer RL, Goldberg RB, Harada JJ (1998) Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93: 1195–1205[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mantovani R (1998) A survey of 178 NF-Y binding CCAAT boxes. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 1135–1143[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mantovani R (1999) The molecular biology of the CCAAT-binding factor NF-Y. Gene 239: 15–27[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Miyoshi K, Ito Y, Serizawa A, Kurata N (2003) OsHAP3 genes regulate chloroplast biogenesis in rice. Plant J 36: 532–540[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Mockler TC, Yu XH, Shalitin D, Parikh D, Michael TP, Liou J, Huang J, Smith Z, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, et al (2004) Regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis by K homology domain proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 12759–12764[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mouradov A, Cremer F, Couplant G (2002) Control of flowering time: interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. Plant Cell (Suppl) 14: S111–S130

Putterill J, Laurie R, Macknight R (2004) It's time to flower: the genetic control of flowering time. Bioessays 26: 363–373[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1988) Extraction of DNA from plant tissues. In SB Gelvin, RA Schilperoort, eds, Plant Molecular Biology Manual. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1–10

Romier C, Cocchiarella F, Mantovani R, Moras D (2003) The NF-YB/NF-YC structure gives insight into DNA binding and transcription regulation by CCAAT factor NF-Y. J Biol Chem 278: 1336–1345[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schmid M, Uhlenhaut NH, Godard F, Demar M, Bressan R, Weigel D, Lohmann JU (2003) Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis. Development 130: 6001–6012[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stangeland B, Salehian Z (2002) An improved clearing method for GUS assay in Arabidopsis endosperm and seeds. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20: 107–114[CrossRef][ISI]

Takada S, Goto K (2003) TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, counteracts the activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time. Plant Cell 15: 2856–2865[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang H, Miyazaki S, Kawai K, Deyholos M, Galbraith DW, Bohnert HJ (2003) Temporal progression of gene expression responses to salt shock in maize roots. Plant Mol Biol 52: 873–891[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Warpeha KM, Upadhyay S, Yeh J, Adamiak J, Hawkins SI, Lapik YR, Anderson MB, Kaufman LS (2007) The GCR1, GPA1, PRN1, NF-Y signal chain mediates both blue light and abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143: 1590–1600[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wenkel S, Turck F, Singer K, Gissot L, Le Gourrierec J, Samach A, Coupland G (2006) CONSTANS and the CCAAT box binding complex share a functionally important domain and interact to regulate flowering of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18: 2971–2984[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang J, Xie Z, Glover BJ (2005) Asymmetric evolution of duplicate genes encoding the CCAAT-binding factor NF-Y in plant genomes. New Phytol 165: 623–632[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Compiled by, F. Tooke, T. Chiurugwi, and N. Battey Flowering Newsletter bibliography for 2007 J. Exp. Bot., July 18, 2008; (2008) ern109v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. N. Hemming, W. J. Peacock, E. S. Dennis, and B. Trevaskis Low-Temperature and Daylength Cues Are Integrated to Regulate FLOWERING LOCUS T in Barley Plant Physiology, May 1, 2008; 147(1): 355 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Abe, M. Fujiwara, K.-i. Kurotani, S. Yokoi, and K. Shimamoto Identification of Dynamin as an Interactor of Rice GIGANTEA by Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP) Plant Cell Physiol., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 420 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Free via Open Access: OA OA Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data OA All Versions of this Article: 145/1/98    most recent pp.107.102079v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cai, X. Articles by Wu, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cai, X. Articles by Wu, Y. Agricola Articles by Cai, X. Articles by Wu, Y.