|
Plant Physiol, March 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 1165-1168
SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
Rapid and Efficient Suppression of Gene Expression in a
Single-Cell Model System, Ceratopteris
richardii1
Stephen C.
Stout,
Gregory
B.
Clark,
Sarah
Archer-Evans,2 and
Stanley J.
Roux*
Section of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of
Texas, 1 University Station A6700, Austin, Texas 78712
 |
ARTICLE |
Germinating Ceratopteris
richardii spores have proven to be a useful single-cell system for
analyzing light and gravity regulation of development (Cooke et
al., 1995 ; Banks, 1999 ; Chatterjee
and Roux, 2000 ; Murata and Sugai, 2000 ), but the
lack of a gene sequence database and of a reliable way to suppress the
expression of specific genes in these cells have made molecular genetic
studies difficult. This report describes the production of an expressed
sequence tag (EST) library for C. richardii and the use of
that information in an RNA interference (RNAi) approach to suppress
expression of target genes during spore germination and development.
The data and discussion presented here expand on the recent
demonstration of RNAi in spores of the fern Marsilea vestita
(Klink and Wolniak, 2000 ) by detailing the sequence
dependence, dose dependence, and specificity of this phenomenon in
C. richardii. It also provides original findings on the
effectiveness of single-stranded RNA in suppressing the expression of
specific genes. The EST and RNAi information provided greatly increase
the utility and value of C. richardii for studying an array
of basic phenomena in single-cell spores including photomorphogenesis,
gravity-directed polarity development, and sex determination and development.
The germination of C. richardii spores is photoreversibly
induced by red light (Cooke et al., 1987 ), and
subsequent polarity development is oriented by the vector of gravity
during a limited window between 6 to 18 h after the initiation of
germination (Edwards and Roux, 1994 ). Several events
indicating polarization can be distinguished during early spore
development. A polar calcium current, directed by gravity, peaks during
the period of axis fixation. Disruption of this current with calcium
channel antagonists reduces the ability of the spore to orient its
polar axis parallel to the vector of gravity (Chatterjee et al.,
2000 ). The calcium current is followed by downward nuclear
migration. This repositioning of the nucleus sets up an asymmetric cell
division, creating a bottom cell that emerges as the rhizoid, and an
upper cell that develops into the gametophyte thallus (Edwards
and Roux, 1998 ).
To facilitate an analysis of the genetic machinery needed for polarity
development in C. richardii spores and to create a large
source of sequence information, we conducted a cDNA sequencing project
and deposited the resulting ESTs in GenBank. RNA isolated from spores
20 h after light initiation of germination (approximately 24 h before the first cell division) was used for a commercially prepared
cDNA library (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Randomly chosen clones from
this library were sequenced, and 3,587 of the resulting single-pass
sequences were submitted to dbEST (GenBank accession nos.
BE640669-BE643506 and BQ086920-BQ087668). The average read length of
the submitted, vector-trimmed sequences is 748 bases.
The identities of the cDNAs in this collection were determined using
BLASTX (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/; Altschul et al.,
1997 ) against the Arabidopsis proteome
(http://www.Arabidopsis.org). Nearly 70% of the ESTs have
significant homology to Arabidopsis entries, and more than 33% of the
EST annotations in the C. richardii collection are for genes
that are represented more than once (Table I). Given this level of redundancy, we
estimate that the set of unique ESTs represents approximately 20% to
25% of total mRNA population at this stage of development. Current
annotations for the C. richardii EST collection can be found
on-line (http://www.esb.utexas.edu/roux/).
Because of the importance of calcium signaling to normal polarity
development in C. richardii, we selected ESTs corresponding to five calcium signaling genes, calmodulin (CaM), CaM domain protein
kinase (CDPK), two distinct annexins, and profilin, a monomeric actin
binding protein whose activity is calcium dependent (Kovar et
al., 2000 ), to fully sequence and characterize. Complete sequences for these genes were determined and deposited in GenBank as
follows: annexin 1, AnnCr1 (AF308588); annexin 2, AnnCr2 (AF308589); CaM, CrCaM1 (AF510075); CDPK,
CrCPK1 (AY138479); and profilin, CrPRO1
(AY102169). Upon request, all novel materials described in this
publication will be made available in a timely manner for noncommercial
research purposes.
With the EST information available, a reverse genetics approach to
knock out or suppress the expression of known, sequenced target genes
became feasible. RNA silencing, or RNAi, is a widely reported and
well-known phenomenon by which the introduction or formation of
double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) induces degradation of homologous mRNA (for
review, see Sharp, 2001 ; Hannon, 2002 ).
This technique has been applied successfully in plants (Chuang
and Meyerowitz, 2000 ) and was first extended to fern spores by
Wolniak and coworkers to study spermiogenesis in M. vestita
spp. gametophytes (Klink and Wolniak, 2000 ; Klink
and Wolniak, 2001 ; Tsai and Wolniak, 2001 ).
Because of the relative ease of synthesizing dsRNA constructs and
introducing the dsRNA into the spore, this approach seemed attractive
as a potentially rapid and efficient method to suppress gene expression
in C. richardii spores (Fig.
1).

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Model of RNAi in C. richardii. dsRNA is
added to the germination medium and taken up by the spore where it
triggers silencing of homologous endogenous mRNA. The paradigm for RNAi
action includes processing of dsRNA into 21 to 25 nucleotide small
interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that guide subsequent degradation of mRNA by
the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC; Hannon,
2002 ).
|
|
To test the efficacy of this approach, we synthesized a number of dsRNA
constructs for the five genes selected from the EST library. DNA
templates for the transcription reactions were made by PCR using
forward and reverse primers that included 5' T7 RNA polymerase promoter
sequence (5'-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACCAC-3'). The resulting DNA
fragments included about 200 bp corresponding to the target gene,
typically from the deduced open reading frame (ORF), and were used for
in vitro transcription reactions (Ampliscribe T7, Epicentre
Technologies, Madison, WI) in which both the sense and antisense
strands were transcribed simultaneously and self-annealed during the
reaction incubation (Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998 ). To
introduce these dsRNAs into the C. richardii spore, 4 mg of surface-sterilized spores were resuspended in 250 µL of liquid spore
germination media (25 mM MES, pH 6.0;
one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog) containing the dsRNA, and the
spores were immediately placed in light to initiate the germination
process (Klink and Wolniak, 2001 ).
Treatments with constructs of dsRNA derived from CrCaM1,
CrCPK1, and CrPRO1 all at a concentration of 0.1 mg mL 1 specifically suppressed steady-state
mRNA levels of the corresponding gene without altering the expression
pattern of any of the other genes assayed (Fig.
2A). The specificity of this effect was
more rigorously tested by attempting to suppress the expression of one
of two highly similar annexin genes, AnnCr1 and
AnnCr2. Constructs of dsRNA were synthesized targeting the
3' end of the ORF regions of these two genes. Within the construct
sequence, each of the dsRNAs shared approximately 80% identity with
the nucleotide sequence of the non-targeted genes. Both of these dsRNA
constructs are able to effectively reduce the steady-state annexin mRNA
levels when compared with untreated spores, and this reduction is
specific for the targeted annexin gene (Fig. 2B). These results
indicate that RNAi is an effective approach to specifically suppress
expression of even closely related genes in C. richardii. A
significant advantage of this system over other plant systems is the
relative ease of delivery of the dsRNAs into the target cells, because
the spores readily take up the dsRNA from the germination
media.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Sequence-specific and concentration-dependent
suppression of gene expression in C. richardii by treatment
with dsRNA. A and B, dsRNA specifically suppresses gene expression.
Spores either were treated with 0.1 mg mL 1 of
various dsRNA constructs or were untreated (lane C). C, Suppression of
gene expression is concentration dependent. Spores were treated with
various concentrations of dsRNA. The constructs targeted the gene for
which expression was assessed. D, Effectiveness of suppression varies
between antisense (asRNA) and dsRNA and the targeted region of the
message. Spores were treated with either asRNA or dsRNA at a
concentration of 0.1 mg mL 1 homologous to
either predominantly the ORF or the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of
AnnCr1 or AnnCr2. The dsRNAs used in A through C
corresponded to the following nucleotide regions of the cDNA sequences
in GenBank: dsCaM, 297 to 497 (AF510075); dsCDPK, 1,492 to 1,695 (AY138479); dsPRO, 345 to 546 (AY102169); dsAnn1, 804 to 1,013 (AF308588); dsAnn2, 968 to 1,185 (AF308589). D, The RNAs used for
asAnn1 and dsAnn1 constructs based on AnnCr1 cDNA sequence
(accession no. AF308588) from bp 1,039 to 1,250, including 98 bp in the
ORF and 102-bp 3'-UTR. asAnn2 and dsAnn2 constructs based on
AnnCr2 cDNA sequence (accession no. AF308589) from bp 918 to
1,118, including 163 bp in the ORF and 48-bp 3'-UTR. For all
experiments, dry spores were placed in germination medium with or
without various dsRNA constructs and allowed to develop for 24 h
in continuous light. Total RNA was then isolated from the spores, and
gene expression levels were assessed using reverse transcriptase
(RT)-PCR. To isolate RNA, harvested spores were ground in equal parts
RNA grinding buffer (1.0 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.3; 5.0 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; and 1% [w/v] SDS) and acidic phenol:chloroform:IAA (pH 5.2; 25:24:1, v/v),
yielding an aqueous layer that was removed and extracted once with
chloroform:IAA (24:1, v/v). Using glycogen as a coprecipitant, the RNA
was precipitated in ethanol, resuspended in diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated water, and treated with DNase I. First-strand
cDNA synthesis was carried out using SuperScript II Reverse
Transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's directions,
and the resulting first-strand cDNA was used as template in PCR
reactions to assess the presence or absence of various genes. For all
panels, the RT-PCR product of a C. richardii actin gene
(accession no. BE643189) was used as an internal control, and the
primers used for RT-PCR and the corresponding size products are as
follows: CrCaM1 (5'-ATGGCTGAGCAACTCACCACT-3';
5'-TCACTTTGAAAGCATCATCCTCA-3'; 449 bp); CrCPK1
(5'-AATACATTTGGACGTGAAGAG-3'; 5'-GAAACAGCCACGAAAACTGCT-3'; 2,252 bp);
CrPRO1 (5'-ATGTCTTGGAATGGGTA TGTTGA-3';
5'-GTACCAAAATCAAGAGCCGTTC-3'; 630 bp); AnnCr1
(5'-AATCCGGTACCTGACACGAA-3';
5'-TTACAGCATCTTCCTTCGCA-3'; 1,000 bp); AnnCr2
(5'-TTACAGTCCCCAATCCGGTA-3'; 5'-AATTCATAATGGAAGTTTTGTCA-3'; 866 bp); and actin (5'-TGCATTGGACTATGAACAGGA-3';
5'-GTATGACGAGTCAGGGCCAT-3'; 446 bp).
|
|
We next examined the concentration of dsRNA required to knock down the
expression levels of the respective genes. Although concentrations of
dsRNA down to 0.01 mg mL 1 can be effective in
reducing expression levels, the most consistent suppression was seen at
10-fold higher concentrations of 0.1 mg mL 1
(Fig. 2C). Because the major events in polarity development occur within the first 96 h of gametophyte development, the duration of
the suppression effect was examined. Spores continuously treated with
dsRNA for CaM exhibit suppression through at least 120 h after
light initiation of germination (data not shown). These results suggest
that RNAi may be used to study events of gravity-directed polarity
development in C. richardii including the polar
Ca2+ current, nuclear migration, asymmetric cell
division, and tip growth, which occur over the first 120 h of development.
Given the ease of uptake of dsRNA into C. richardii spores,
it became of interest to learn whether single-stranded antisense RNA
(asRNA) could also be taken up, and if so, to compare the relative
effectiveness of dsRNA and asRNA constructs in suppressing gene
expression. For these tests, both the dsRNA and asRNA constructs used were based on sequences bridging the ORF-3'-UTR border of the two
closely related annexin cDNA sequences.
For AnnCr1, but not for AnnCr2, the antisense
construct was more effective than a dsRNA construct based on the same
sequence. The asRNA for AnnCr1 specifically and completely
knocked out AnnCr1, whereas the corresponding dsRNA
construct did not reduce AnnCr1 expression levels (Fig. 2D).
In contrast, the dsRNA Ann2 construct was much more effective than the
single-stranded construct in reducing the level of steady-state message
for its targeted annexin (Fig. 2D). A significant difference between
the AnnCr1 and AnnCr2 constructs is that the
AnnCr1 RNAs target proportionately more of the 3'-UTR than
the AnnCr2 constructs. The AnnCr2 constructs conversely contain more ORF sequence than those targeting
AnnCr1. These results suggest that dsRNA constructs are more
effective at suppressing expression when they are based on the ORF of a gene than when based on the 3'-UTR. However, it appears that antisense constructs do not share the same limitation.
The antisense results are in contrast to those reported previously in
the M. vestita system. In M. vestita,
asRNAs targeting centrin required 10-fold greater concentrations than
the corresponding dsRNA constructs to be effective (Klink and
Wolniak, 2001 ). One possible explanation for this conflicting
result is that the centrin constructs used in the M. vestita
studies were based solely on the ORF region of the targeted gene. Our
results also indicate that the antisense Ann1 construct is more
effective than the antisense Ann2 construct, which targets only
one-half as much of the 3'-UTR (Fig. 2D).
A new family of expressed RNAs, termed micro-RNAs, has recently been
discovered in a wide variety of eukaryotes including plants and may
represent a novel way of regulating gene expression (Grosshans
and Slack, 2002 ; Reinhart et al., 2002 ;
Llave et al., 2002 ). These small RNAs appear to be
complimentary to the 3'-UTR of target transcripts and are very
effective at decreasing message levels for a particular endogenous gene
(Lai, 2002 ). One intriguing possibility is that the
antisense constructs we used in this study are effective because they
include a micro-RNA sequence within their 3'-UTR.
Together, these results describe a complete system allowing a rapid and
efficient assessment of gene function during an important developmental
stage. Among the more than 2,300 different ESTs in the C. richardii library are many genes that are likely candidates for
involvement in signaling. The methodology described here provides a
facile yet effective approach for testing the role of these genes in
light and gravity signaling and in basic cellular processes such as
polarity development and cell division.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Dr. Phillip San Miguel for his assistance with the
sequencing and EST data. We also thank Dr. Jo Ann Banks for generously providing additional funding for the EST sequencing project. The ESTs
were sequenced at the Purdue Agricultural Genomics Facility, Purdue
University (West Lafayette, IN).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received October 30, 2002; returned for revision November 11, 2002; accepted November 11, 2002.
1
This work was supported by the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant nos. NAG2-1347 and
NAG10-295 to S.J.R. and NGT5-50371 to S.C.S.) and by the National
Science Foundation (grant no. IBN-0080363). Additional support was
provided by Purdue University.
2
Present address: Section of Plant Biology, Division of
Biological Sciences, 1 Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail sroux{at}uts.cc.utexas.edu; fax
512-232-3402
www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.016949.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res
25: 3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Banks JA
(1999)
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
50: 163-186[CrossRef][ISI]
-
Chatterjee A, Porterfield DM, Smith PS, Roux SJ
(2000)
Planta
210: 607-610[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Chatterjee A, Roux SJ
(2000)
J Plant Growth Regul
19: 284-289[Medline]
-
Chuang CF, Meyerowitz EM
(2000)
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97: 4985-4990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooke TJ, Hickok LG, Sugai M
(1995)
Int J Plant Sci
156: 367-373[CrossRef]
-
Cooke TJ, Racusen RH, Hickok LG, Warne TR
(1987)
Plant Cell Physiol
28: 753-759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Edwards ES, Roux SJ
(1994)
Planta
195: 150-152[ISI][Medline]
-
Edwards ES, Roux SJ
(1998)
Planta
205: 553-560[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Grosshans H, Slack FJ
(2002)
J Cell Biol
156: 17-21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hannon GJ
(2002)
Nature
418: 244-251[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Kennerdell JR, Carthew RW
(1998)
Cell
95: 1017-1026[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Klink VP, Wolniak SM
(2000)
J Plant Growth Regul
19: 371-384[Medline]
-
Klink VP, Wolniak SM
(2001)
Mol Biol Cell
12: 761-776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kovar DR, Drøback BK, Staiger CJ
(2000)
Plant Cell
12: 583-598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lai EC
(2002)
Nat Genet
30: 363-364[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Llave C, Kasschau KD, Rector MA, Carrington JC
(2002)
Plant Cell
14: 1605-1619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murata T, Sugai M
(2000)
Plant Cell Physiol
41: 1313-1320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reinhart BJ, Weinstein EG, Rhoades MW, Bartel B, Bartel DP
(2002)
Genes Dev
16: 1616-1626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sharp PA
(2001)
Genes Dev
14: 485-490
-
Tsai CW, Wolniak SM
(2001)
J Cell Sci
114: 4265-4272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
© 2003 American Society of Plant Biologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Salmi, T. J. Bushart, S. C. Stout, and S. J. Roux
Profile and Analysis of Gene Expression Changes during Early Development in Germinating Spores of Ceratopteris richardii
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2005;
138(3):
1734 - 1745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kawai-Toyooka, C. Kuramoto, K. Orui, K. Motoyama, K. Kikuchi, T. Kanegae, and M. Wada
DNA Interference: a Simple and Efficient Gene-Silencing System for High-Throughput Functional Analysis in the Fern Adiantum
Plant Cell Physiol.,
November 15, 2004;
45(11):
1648 - 1657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Tanurdzic and J. A. Banks
Sex-Determining Mechanisms in Land Plants
PLANT CELL,
June 1, 2004;
16(suppl_1):
S61 - S71.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bezanilla, A. Pan, and R. S. Quatrano
RNA Interference in the Moss Physcomitrella patens
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2003;
133(2):
470 - 474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|