|
|
||||||||
|
First published online January 9, 2003; 10.1104/pp.013094 Plant Physiol, February 2003, Vol. 131, pp. 684-696 A Low-Starch Barley Mutant, Risø 16, Lacking the Cytosolic Small Subunit of ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase, Reveals the Importance of the Cytosolic Isoform and the Identity of the Plastidial Small Subunit1John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norfolk NR4 7UH, United Kingdom (P.E.J., N.J.P., A.R.B., B.F.F., D.N.W., K.D.); Department of Zoology and Genetics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 (J.R.D.); and Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norfolk NR4 7UA, United Kingdom (M.L.P.)
To provide information on the roles of the different forms of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) in barley (Hordeum vulgare) endosperm and the nature of the genes encoding their subunits, a mutant of barley, Risø 16, lacking cytosolic AGPase activity in the endosperm was identified. The mutation specifically abolishes the small subunit of the cytosolic AGPase and is attributable to a large deletion within the coding region of a previously characterized small subunit gene that we have called Hv.AGP.S.1. The plastidial AGPase activity in the mutant is unaffected. This shows that the cytosolic and plastidial small subunits of AGPase are encoded by separate genes. We purified the plastidial AGPase protein and, using amino acid sequence information, we identified the novel small subunit gene that encodes this protein. Studies of the Risø 16 mutant revealed the following. First, the reduced starch content of the mutant showed that a cytosolic AGPase is required to achieve the normal rate of starch synthesis. Second, the mutant makes both A- and B-type starch granules, showing that the cytosolic AGPase is not necessary for the synthesis of these two granule types. Third, analysis of the phylogenetic relationships between the various small subunit proteins both within and between species, suggest that the cytosolic AGPase single small subunit gene probably evolved from a leaf single small subunit gene.
In the endosperm of all of the
species of grasses so far investigated, there are both cytosolic and
plastidial forms of the enzyme of ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase (AGPase).
However, there are indications that there may be differences between
species in the relative amounts of the plastidial and cytosolic
activities of AGPase in the endosperm and in the nature of the genes
encoding their subunits. Studies of mutants of maize (Zea
mays) show that the cytosolic form accounts for >95% of the
total activity of AGPase in the endosperm (Denyer et al.,
1996 First, the plastidial activity as a proportion of the total AGPase
activity is considerably higher in barley endosperm (15%; Thorbjørnsen et al., 1996b Second, a SSU gene in barley produces two transcripts in the endosperm
(Thorbjørnsen et al., 1996a We reasoned that these major questions about AGPase
in grass species other than maize could be addressed by the discovery and characterization of mutants lacking cytosolic AGPase activity in
the endosperm. Such mutants might be expected to have a lower than
normal starch content. A good place to search for suitable genetic
variants of a grass species other that maize is in the existing
collections of barley mutants. Low-starch mutants of barley exist that
are not allelic to one another. Limited genetic and biochemical
characterization of these suggests that within the low-starch group of
barley mutants, there are at least eight separate complementation
groups. Apart from the waxy mutants that carry mutations in
the gene encoding granule-bound starch synthase I (e.g. Patron
et al., 2002 To discover whether any of the existing low-starch barley mutants
lacked cytosolic AGPase activity, we screened for altered amounts of
ADP-Glc and an altered ratio of ADP-Glc to UDP-Glc in the
developing endosperms. The rationale for this approach was as follows.
The endosperms of wild-type grasses, in which there are both plastidial
and cytosolic AGPases, typically contain larger amounts of
ADP-Glc than do organs in which AGPase is confined to the plastids
(Beckles et al., 2001
Identification of a Mutant with Low ADP-Glc Content We measured the ADP-Glc and UDP-Glc contents of developing
endosperms of 12 to 37 mg fresh weight of the following previously identified low-starch mutant barley lines: Risø 13, Risø 16, Risø 17, Risø 29, Risø 527, Risø 1508 (Doll, 1983 Risø 16 Has a Reduced Activity of AGPase in the Endosperm Measurements of the activities of various enzymes in the pathway of starch synthesis in the developing endosperms of Risø 16 and the wild-type, parental line Bomi showed that Risø 16 endosperm possessed only 15% to 25% of the normal AGPase activity (Table I). The activity of starch-branching enzyme was also reduced in the mutant but not to the same extent as AGPase. The activities of the other enzymes measured were either higher than normal in the mutant or were not statistically significantly different from normal.
The Subcellular Location of AGPase Activity in Wild-Type and Risø 16 Endosperms The low ADP-Glc content of Risø 16 endosperms, together with a decreased total AGPase activity, is consistent with the idea that this mutant lacks the cytosolic form of AGPase. To discover the location of the residual AGPase activity in Risø 16, we used three different methods. Both of the first two methods involved the isolation of a fraction that was enriched in plastids by chopping the developing endosperm tissue to release intact plastids and collecting these from the resulting homogenate by centrifugation. First, plastid fractions were deliberately contaminated with varying amounts of the supernatant fraction and these combined fractions were assayed for the activities of AGPase and marker enzymes known to be exclusively located in either the plastids or the cytosol. The relative activities of these marker enzymes and AGPase in fractions of wild-type (Bomi) or Risø 16 endosperms were then compared as shown in Figure 1. The proportion of the total AGPase activity that was attributable to the plastids is indicated by the intercept on the y axis. AGPase clearly was almost completely plastidial in the mutant, whereas only a small proportion of AGPase activity was plastidial in the wild type.
Second, the activities of AGPase and marker enzymes were determined for
the homogenate, plastid-enriched pellet, and supernatant fractions of
endosperms of Bomi and Risø 16 (Table
II). From these values, the percentage of
AGPase activity in the plastids was calculated according to
Denyer and Smith (1988)
The third method was based on our previous discovery that
the plastidial and cytosolic forms of AGPase in developing wheat endosperm could be separated by chromatography on columns of Q Sepharose (Burton et al., 2002b
Western blots of crude homogenate of wild-type endosperm probed with an
antiserum raised against the cytosolic AGPase SSU of maize endosperm
(BT2 antiserum) showed the expected doublet of proteins (Fig.
2b). The higher and lower Mr proteins
correspond to the cytosolic and plastidial SSU proteins, respectively
(Thorbjørnsen et al., 1996b Risø 16 Lacks the Cytosolic But Not the Plastidial AGPase SSU Protein When western blots of homogenates of endosperms of the mutant were probed with the BT2 antiserum, the small subunit of the cytosolic AGPase could not be detected. To determine whether there was any change in this pattern of small subunit proteins during endosperm development, we examined the abundance of AGPase SSUs in endosperms of different ages (Fig. 3a). For the wild-type endosperms, the amounts of both proteins per endosperm increased with developmental age. With Risø 16 endosperms, at all developmental stages examined, the cytosolic SSU protein was absent. The plastidial SSU protein increased in amount per endosperm with developmental age as in the wild type.
We examined the SSU proteins in leaves, pericarps, roots, and embryos of mutant and wild-type plants using the BT2 antiserum (data not shown). Only a single protein band of the same size as the plastidial protein in endosperms was observed, and this was present in organs of mutant and wild-type plants. This showed that the cytosolic SSU protein is present only in the endosperm and that in all organs examined, the plastidial AGPase proteins were not affected by the mutation. We examined the LSU proteins in endosperms using antisera raised
against the LSUs of endosperms of maize or barley (maize SH2
[Giroux and Hannah, 1994 Risø 16 Is Deficient in Starch Synthesis throughout Endosperm Development Previous measurements of mature seeds of Risø 16 show that they
have 44% of the starch contents of normal seeds and 72% of the normal
weight (Tester et al., 1993 For both lines, the starch content and seed weight increased with age, with the maximal rates of starch synthesis occurring at 16 to 22 DPA. At all developmental stages, both seed weight and starch content were lower in Risø 16 than in Bomi. No large differences between Bomi and Risø 16 in either the timing of the onset of starch accumulation or its cessation were observed. These data suggested that Risø 16 has a reduced capacity for starch synthesis in the endosperm and that this deficiency occurred throughout the grain-filling period. The A-Type Starch Granules in Risø 16 Are Misshapen Examination of mature seeds of Risø 16 by scanning electron
microscopy showed that most of the A-type starch granules were smaller
than normal and were misshapen (Fig. 4).
The B-type granules were also smaller than normal but there were no
obvious differences in their shape. The A-type granules are thought to
grow by the expansion of an equatorial zone beginning at one side of an
initially spherical granule and growing in two plates or lobes around
the circumference to meet eventually at the opposite side
(Evers, 1971
Analysis of the Gene Encoding the AGPase Small Subunit, Hv.AGP.S.1 A single gene thought to encode both the plastidial and cytosolic
AGPase SSUs of barley has been described previously (AGPaseB; P55238;
Thorbjørnsen et al., 1996a
To determine whether the mutation responsible for the low
starch-phenotype of Risø 16 directly affects Hv.AGP.S.1, and if so, in
what way, we used PCR to compare the AGPase SSU genes in Risø 16 and
the wild type. Primers were designed to amplify various segments of the
coding region of Hv.AGP.S.1 (Fig. 5). PCR showed that fragments of the
expected size could be amplified from the wild-type Bomi but not from
the mutant Risø 16. However, fragments of the same size and with
identical sequences were observed for mutant and wild type using
primers that amplified the 3'-untranslated region (-UTR) of the gene.
These data suggest that a large proportion of the coding region of the
gene Hv.AGP.S.1 is missing in Risø 16. The presence of a large
deletion in Risø 16 is consistent with the fast-neutron bombardment
that was used to create the mutant population from which it was
selected (Doll, 1983 The lack of cytosolic AGPase activity and a functional Hv.AGP.S.1 gene
in Risø 16 shows that this gene encodes the cytosolic AGPase SSU. The
cytosolic SSU of AGPase protein in wheat endosperm is similarly encoded
by one of the two transcripts produced from Ta.AGP.S.1 (Burton
et al., 2002b Purification and Sequencing of AGPase from Wild-Type Endosperm To provide sequence information for the plastidial and cytosolic
SSUs of AGPase, we purified these proteins from wild-type barley
endosperm (Table III). The purification
scheme was the same as that designed to purify these proteins from
wheat endosperm (Burton et al., 2002b
A gel showing AGPases from a typical purification from wild-type endosperms is shown in Figure 6. The major proteins labeled a through e (Fig. 6) were submitted to MALDI-TOF analysis. From the cytosolic fraction, proteins corresponding to both the large and small subunits of cytosolic AGPase were identified in protein band d. In addition, contaminating proteins (b and c) were identified as isoforms of Suc synthase. From the plastidial fraction, a SSU protein was identified in band a.
All of the proteins identified by MALDI-TOF analysis as subunits of AGPase were subjected to amino acid sequencing by Q-TOF. The amino acid sequences of fragments of the cytosolic large and small subunits confirmed that these proteins were encoded by previously identified genes. However, the sequences of fragments of the plastidial protein did not match any previously identified genes. The sequences of the plastidial SSU protein fragments specifically differed from the predicted sequence of the putative plastidial SSU encoded by Hv.AGP.S.1 in five of 49 amino acids (Table IV).
Identification of a Novel Plastidial AGPase Small Subunit cDNA To identify the gene encoding the novel plastidial SSU
of AGPase, we searched for novel AGPase SSU expressed sequence tags (ESTs). A barley EST (accession no. AL505815) was identified that was
similar but not identical (94% identity in the amino acid level) to
the equivalent region of Hv.AGP.S.1. Oligonucleotides to this EST were
used to amplify a full-length cDNA that was cloned and sequenced
(accession no. AF537363). We will refer to this cDNA and the gene
encoding it as Hv.AGP.S.2. This cDNA is 82% identical to the
Hv.AGP.S.1b transcript encoding a putative plastidial SSU (accession
no. Z48563). The cereal AGPase with which it shares most identity
(89%) is the rice (Oryza sativa) seed SSU (accession no.
AY028315; Sikka et al., 2001 The full-length cDNA was obtained by reverse transcriptase-PCR from RNA purified from endosperms of less than 20 mg. In older endosperms, a smaller transcript derived from HV.AGP.S.2 was present (Fig. 7). When sequenced, this smaller transcript was found to lack nucleotides 36 to 239 (inclusive), which encode the bulk of the predicted transit peptide and the beginning of the mature SSU protein. This transcript may be the result of aberrant processing of the HV.AGP.S.2 pre-mRNA. However, the sequences of the splice sites used are not consensus splice-site sequences.
The tissue-specific pattern of expression of Hv. AGP.S.1 and Hv.AGP.S.2 in the mutant Risø 16 and wild-type Bomi were compared using northern blots. Specific probes were made from the unique 3'-UTRs of these genes. The Hv.AGP.S.1 transcript could be detected in endosperms, embryos, and leaves of the wild type (Fig. 7a; data not shown), but it could not be detected in any of the examined organs of the Risø 16 plants. In the wild type, Hv.AGP.S.1 was expressed most strongly in the endosperms and less strongly in the embryos, and the expression was stronger in younger endosperms than in old endosperms. The Hv.AGP.S.1 (Fig. 7a) and the Hv.AGP.S.2 (Fig. 7b) transcripts could be seen in both mutant and wild-type endosperms and embryos. No expression of Hv.AGP.S.2 could be detected in the leaves of either genotype even after an extended exposure (data not shown). Thus the expression of Hv.AGP.S.2 is not affected by the mutation in Risø 16. Unlike Hv.AGP.S.1, there were no large differences between young and old endosperms in the amounts of Hv.AGP.S.2 transcript. However, the size of the Hv.AGP.S.2 transcript observed in older endosperms was smaller than that seen in younger endosperms. The transcript in older endosperms corresponds in size to the truncated form of Hv.AGP.S.2 observed in the PCR experiments described above. In embryos, both truncated and full-length transcripts were detected by the Hv.AGP.S.2 probe. It would appear that the Hv.AGP.S.2 transcript in different tissues is subject to various degrees of posttranscriptional processing. The physiological significance of this is unknown at present. Phylogenetic Analysis of the AGPase SSUs of the Grasses Phylogenetic analysis of the coding sequences of the currently known AGPase SSUs of the grass family (Fig. 8) shows that there are at least two distinct subgroups or clades. One clade (type 1 genes) consists of cDNAs encoding the cytosolic SSUs of cereal endosperms such as Ta.AGP.S.1a and Hv.AGP.S.1a. It also includes the putative plastidial transcript Hv.AGP.S.1b (barley 1b) for which no protein has yet been identified. This transcript is identical to Hv.AGP.S.1a (barley 1a) except for the region corresponding to exon 1. The second clade (type 2 genes) includes the plastidial SSUs of cereal seeds and is statistically significant (62% bootstrap support). This clade consists of cDNAs encoding embryo and endosperm plastidial AGPase SSU such as our novel barley endosperm SSU. This suggests that, in the grass family, a single gene encodes the plastidial SSUs of both the embryos and endosperms. The SSUs of different species within a clade are more similar to one another than are SSUs within a species. This suggests that the type 1 and 2 AGPase small subunit genes existed before the divergence of these species within the grass family.
There is, at present, only one leaf SSU sequence (type 3 gene) available for the grass family, and this shows a closer phylogenetic relationship to the cytosolic SSUs (type 1) than to the seed-plastidial SSUs (type 2). The statistical significance of the cytosolic clade is low because of the close relationship of the maize endosperm cytosolic cDNA to the maize leaf cDNA. This high similarity resulted in a proportion (though not significant) of the 100 trees used to make this consensus tree, grouping these two maize genes together as a separate clade (as described by Hannah et al. [2001]). In most eudicots for which information is available, as in grasses,
there are multiple AGPase SSU genes. An exception is Arabidopsis, for
which we have found only one type of SSU gene (Burton et al., 2002b
The Plastidial and Cytosolic SSUs of Barley Seeds Are Encoded by Two Separate Genes Comparison of wild-type and Risø 16 barley clearly shows
that there are two genes encoding different AGPase SSUs in barley seeds. Hv.AGP.S.1 (identified by Thorbjørnsen et al.
[1996b] Thorbjørnsen et al. (1996b) Plastidial AGPase Alone Cannot Support the Normal Rate of Starch Synthesis The Risø 16 mutant of barley resembles the bt2 mutant
of maize in that both lack the cytosolic SSU of AGPase, have no
cytosolic AGPase activity, and have a reduced starch content. In
barley, the plastidial activity of AGPase was estimated to be greater than the rate of starch synthesis, and hence it was suggested that the
cytosolic AGPase activity could potentially be redundant (Thorbjørnsen et al., 1996a Lack of the Cytosolic AGPase Leads to Many Pleiotropic Effects We observed changes in activities of enzymes other than AGPase in
developing endosperms of Risø 16. The cause of this is not known, but
such changes are common in starch mutants of grasses. For example, we
observed decreases in starch-branching enzyme and alkaline
pyrophosphatase and increases in soluble starch synthase and AGPase
activities in a mutant of barley lacking activity of the
starch-debranching enzyme, isoamylase (Risø 17; Burton et al.,
2002a Cytosolic AGPase Activity Is Not Required for the Synthesis of A- or B-Type Granules The Risø 16 mutant makes both A-type and B-type starch granules,
showing that neither the cytosolic AGPase nor a supply of ADP-Glc from
the cytosol is necessary for the synthesis of these two granule types.
The shape and size of the A-type starch granules is more profoundly
affected than that of the B-type granules (this paper; Tester et
al., 1993 The Cytosolic AGPase SSU Gene Probably Evolved from a Leaf SSU Gene From the phylogenetic relationships shown in Figure 8 and the assumption that close sequence identity reflects recent sequence duplication, we propose that the cytosolic SSU genes (type 1) of the grass family derive from an ancestral leaf-SSU gene (type 3) rather than from a plastidial seed-SSU gene (type 2). This idea is supported by the closer phylogenetic relationship between the type 1 and type 3 genes than between the type 1 and type 2 genes. Whether the type 1 genes evolved once or several times during the
evolution of the grasses is difficult to determine given the paucity of
type 3 genes currently available. If the duplication event leading to
the evolution of a cytosolic AGPase SSU occurred only once during the
evolution of the grass family, then all of the cytosolic genes would be
descendants of the same ancestral, duplicated leaf-SSU gene. However,
as discussed by Hannah et al. (2001)
Plant Material Barley (Hordeum vulgare) lines were from the John
Innes Germplasm Collection. Plants were grown in individual pots in a
greenhouse at a minimum temperature of 12°C, with supplementary
lighting in winter to give 16-h days. Tissues were used immediately or harvested directly into liquid nitrogen and stored at Extraction and Assay of ADP-Glc and UDP-Glc Duplicate samples of endosperm were isolated from grain by
squeezing or rapid dissection and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen endosperms were extracted by grinding in perchloric acid, extracts were neutralized, and ADP-Glc and UDP-Glc were assayed by HPLC on a Partisil-10-SAX column (Hichrom Ltd., Reading, UK) as described by Beckles et al. (2001) Enzyme Activities AGPase activity was assayed as in Smith (1990 Extraction and Assay of Starch Starch content of developing seeds was determined as described
by Smith (1988) Isolation of Plastids from Developing Barley Endosperm Plastids were isolated from developing barley endosperm of
approximately 10 mg fresh weight as described for wheat by
Burton et al. (2002b) Localization of AGPase Activity in Barley Endosperm The AGPase activity of wheat endosperm was localized to the
plastid or extraplastidial compartments essentially according to the
method of Denyer and Smith (1988) Other Methods SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, purification of cytosolic and
plastidial AGPase from developing barley endosperm, and identification of AGPase subunits by MALDI-TOF and Q-TOF were as described by Burton et al. (2002b) Isolation of Total RNA and cDNA Synthesis RNA was purified from endosperm, embryo, and leaf tissues using Concert Plant RNA reagent (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) as described by the manufacturer. cDNA was synthesized from 10 µg of total RNA using an oligo(dT) primer at 58°C with Thermoscript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) or at 42°C with Superscript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Isolation of Genomic DNA and PCR DNA was extracted from 0.1-g samples of young barley
leaves with the DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR with five sets of primers (7+, 5'-CCCACACTCATCACACAATCAAC-3', and 8 Amplification of a cDNA Encoding a Novel AGPase SSU Total RNA was purified from non-photosynthetic tissues of grains of 20 to 40 mg fresh weight and used to synthesize cDNA from a poly(T) primer using the Gene Racer Kit for RACE (Invitrogen). Forward (5'-AGAGCCCGGAGAATCCTAACT-3' and 5'-TACTGGGCCTTGATTCTGAGAG-3') and reverse (5'-AGTTAGGATTCTCCGGGCTCT-3' and 5'-GAACTGCGTCAGCACATAGATC-3') primers were designed to EST AL505815 for 3'- and 5'-RACE. All RACE products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector and sequenced. Northern Analysis Total RNA (10 µg) was separated on a 1% (w/v) agarose
denaturing gel with size standards (Promega, Madison, WI). RNA was
visualized with ethidium bromide under UV light to ensure equal
loading. RNA was transferred to Duralon nylon membrane (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) by capillary transfer and cross-linked using UV light. The
3'-UTR of HV.AGP.S.1 was amplified from endosperm cDNA with primers
5'-GCCAAAAGACAGGGTACTTGCGTCAG'-3' and
5'-GCATCGAAGGTTTGCACGAACCATAC-3', and the 3'-UTR of HV.AGP.S.2 was
amplified with primers 5'-GAGATGCAGCCGTCATCGCCATGTA-3' and
5'-CAGTGCAATTCTCAGTTTTATTATGGCCTT-3'. The PCR products were labeled with [32P]dCTP using the RediPrime system
(Amersham Biosciences UK, Ltd., Little Chalfont, UK). Membranes were
hybridized in 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 10 mM EDTA, and 7% SDS for 16 h at 65°C and washed
with 0.1× SSC containing 0.1% SDS. Autoradiography was performed at
Phylogenetic Analysis The coding regions of AGPase SSU cDNAs were aligned using PILEUP from the Wisconsin GCG v10.1 package (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI) on a Unix platform. The multiple sequence file was converted for use in the Phylip v3.6 package. Statistical support was given by the SEQBOOT program using 100 bootstraps, and the resulting datasets were analyzed using DNAPARS with 10 jumbles. The CONSENSE program was used to make the consensus tree.
We thank Dr. Alison M. Smith and Dr. David Laurie (John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK) for support, encouragement, and useful discussions throughout the course of this work and for constructive criticism of the manuscript. We are very grateful to Prof. Curt Hannah (University of Florida, Gainesville) for the gifts of the BT2 and SH2 antisera and to Dr. Tine Thorbjørnsen (laboratory of Odd-Arne Olsen, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås) for the gift of the barley LSU antiserum.
Received August 22, 2002; returned for revision September 25, 2002; accepted October 21, 2002. 1 This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK; competitive strategic grant to the John Innes Centre), by DuPont Agricultural Products (Newark, DE), and by the Iowa State University College of Agriculture (Ames; international travel award to J.R.D.).
2 These authors contributed equally to the paper.
* Corresponding author; e-mail kay.denyer{at}bbsrc.ac.uk; fax 44-1603-450045.
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/doi/10.1104/pp.013094.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||