Plant Physiol, September 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 10-13
SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE
Ion Transporters in the Nucleus?1
Marjori
Matzke,*
Werner
Aufsatz,
Wolfgang
Gregor,
Johannes
van der
Winden,
István
Papp, and
Antonius J.M.
Matzke
Institute of Molecular Biology, Austrian Academy of Sciences,
Billrothstrasse 11, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
 |
ARTICLE |
The nucleus of eukaryotic cells is
bounded by a double membrane system perforated by the nuclear pores,
which provide an aqueous channel for bidirectional transport of ions
and molecules between the nucleus and the cytoplasm (Smith and Raikhel,
1999
). The presence of these large pores, which have an average open
diameter of approximately 10 nm, has tended to divert attention from
the possible ion transport properties of the inner and outer nuclear
membranes (INM and ONM, respectively). In principle, ions could be
translocated across either membrane into or out of the perinuclear
space, which is continuous with the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum
(Fig. 1). Ion transport across the entire
nuclear envelope (NE) or the INM is particularly intriguing because of
the potential for independently regulated ion fluxes in the nucleus to
influence various aspects of nuclear physiology. Although the
traditional view holds that the nuclear pores are static aqueous
channels that offer no resistance to the flow of inorganic ions, there
is growing evidence, particularly from electrophysiological studies and
experiments using the calcium reporter aequorin, which suggests that
they can present a barrier to ions in various cell types (Mazzanti et
al., 2001
). Given the contentious nature of NE ion permeability (Brini
and Carafoli, 2000
; Mazzanti et al., 2001
) and the dearth of
information about ion transport proteins in the INM or ONM, additional
studies in this area are clearly warranted. The identification of
potential ion transporters in the nucleus would permit functional
analyses to be carried out with the possible pathways of nuclear ion
transport in mind.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Possible ion transporters in the nucleus. Screens
of ion transport proteins for putative bipartite NLSs identified
possible nuclear variants of the transporters that are shown in the
INM. Potential routes of ion transport across the INM, ONM, and NE are
shown by the three sets of small bidirectional arrows. Whether a
transport protein resides in the nucleus or the plasma membrane (or
other cytoplasmic membrane) might depend on the presence of an NLS
(heavy arrows). PM, Plasma membrane; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PNS,
perinuclear space.
|
|
The uncertainty about ion transport proteins in the INM or ONM is due
in part to difficulties in obtaining nuclear membrane preparations free
of contamination from other cellular membranes. Electrophysiological
approaches for studying ion channels, such as patch clamp analyses, can
be performed on isolated nuclei, but this technique does not guarantee
access to INM channels. Patch clamp studies performed to date have
identified various nuclear ion channels in animal and plant cells
(Mazzanti et al., 2001
). The exact location of these nuclear channels
is not always specified, although some have been reported to be present
in the ONM (Franco-Obregón et al., 2000
) and others in the INM
(Rousseau et al., 1996
). Several nuclear ion channels detected so far
might represent conductance substates of the nuclear pores (Mazzanti et
al., 2001
).
With respect to molecular analyses of nuclear ion channels, the only
nuclear membrane channel to be cloned up until now is nuclear chloride
channel-27/chloride intracellular channel (NCC27/CLIC1), which is
located predominantly in the nuclei of some types of animal cells
(Valenzuela et al., 1997
; Tonini et al., 2000
; Tulk et al., 2000
).
Disposition in the INM would imply that a protein contains one or more
nuclear localization signals (NLSs) to facilitate transport through the
nuclear pores from the site of synthesis in the cytoplasm. Indeed,
NCC27/CLIC1 was reported to have two monopartite NLSs (Valenzuela et
al., 1997
), which are defined as a cluster of basic amino acid residues
(Hodel et al., 2001
).
We searched the Arabidopsis database for NCC27/CLIC1 homologs and found
four proteins (accession nos. AAF79440, AAG12679, AAG24946, and
BAB09367) that have been annotated as putative glutathione-dependent
dehydroascorbate reductases (DHAR). The four Arabidopsis DHARs have
only weak overall homology to NCC27/CLIC1 and other CLIC family members
(ranging from 21%-25% amino acid identity), and the only common
motif identified through the INTERPRO domain database
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) is a
glutathione-S-transferase domain. NCC27/CLIC1 has several motifs characteristic of chloride channels that are not present in
Arabidopsis DHARs, which also do not contain NLSs. Therefore, despite
the sequence similarity to NCC27/CLIC1, Arabidopsis DHARs do not appear
to be chloride channels, although they might modulate channel activity
similarly to some animal glutathione-S-transferases (Dulhunty et al., 2001
).
To get a handle on potential INM ion transporters in plants, we have
screened various families of recognized and putative ion transport
proteins in Arabidopsis
(http://www-biology.ucsd.edu/~ipaulsen/transport/atha.html) for potential bipartite NLSs using the INTERPRO domain database. Bipartite NLSs consist of short runs of basic amino acids separated by
approximately 10 amino acids. The prototypical bipartite NLS is present
in Xenopus laevis nucleoplasmin and has the sequence KR-10 amino acids-KKKL (Hodel et al., 2001
). Only a few
NLSs have been functionally characterized in plants, but they follow
the general pattern observed for animal and yeast NLSs (Jans et al., 2000
). Although we must emphasize that the presence of a bipartite NLS-like sequence does not guarantee that a protein is indeed nuclear,
the analysis permits a preselection of possible INM ion transporters,
which can then be analyzed in more detail using other methods. It
should also be mentioned that the INTERPRO domain database only detects
putative bipartite and not monopartite or other classes of NLSs (Jans
et al., 2000
). Therefore, in addition to picking up potential false
positives, it is also possible that bona fide nuclear proteins would
not be identified using this database.
Our survey has revealed that a number of established or predicted
transport proteins contain one or more putative bipartite NLSs. These
include some calcium ATPases and some members listed in the
voltage-gated ion channel family (Table
I). The following families of ion
transporter proteins were screened for bipartite NLSs.
(1) V-type ATPases are H+- or
Na+-translocating ATPases present in vacuoles. Of
30 nonredundant entries, none contained an NLS. Members of this family
offer good controls for the reliability of using an NLS as a predictor
of nuclear localization, as none is expected to be nuclear based on
previously known functions.
(2) P-type ATPases catalyze cation uptake and/or efflux by
ATP hydrolysis. We screened recognized and putative
Ca2+ and H+ ATPases for
NLSs. Of 18 nonredundant entries for Ca2+
ATPases, six had one or two putative NLSs (Table I), suggesting that
the NE actively transports Ca2+. Indeed, the
Ca2+ transport properties of the NE have been
studied intensively and there is considerable evidence that the
Ca2+ concentration can be regulated independently
in the nucleus and the cytoplasm in both plant and animal cells
(Bootman et al., 2000
; Brini and Carafoli, 2000
; Pauly et al., 2000
).
The possible presence of Ca2+ ATPases in the INM
would imply that calcium is pumped into and/or out of the perinuclear
space (Fig. 1). This makes sense in view of the probable continuity of
this compartment with the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum, which
accumulates Ca2+ by a pump and releases it via
gated channels (Brini and Carafoli, 2000
). None of the 12 nonredundant
entries for H+ ATPases had an NLS, suggesting
that H+ transport is not a property of the NE or INM.
(3) Voltage-gated ion channel family members annotated as
probable cyclic nucleotide gated cation channels and
K+ channels were screened for NLSs. Three of 19 in the former category and two of 15 in the latter category contained
one or more NLSs (Table I).
(4) Chloride channel family members were screened and one
out of seven was found to contain a possible NLS (Table I).
The presence of putative NLSs in these transport proteins supports
the idea that the NE and/or INM actively transports
Ca2+ and that it contains voltage- and cyclic
nucleotide-gated cation channels (Fig. 1). The candidates for NE/INM
transporter proteins preselected by the presence of a putative
bipartite NLS can be further analyzed by (1) making GFP protein fusions
to confirm nuclear localization, (2) carrying out functional analyses
using various gene silencing techniques, and (3) performing
electrophysiological experiments to determine channel characteristics
in transfected cells (Tonini et al., 2000
) or liposomes (Guihard et
al., 2000
).
Three of the transport proteins identified as potentially nuclear have
been studied previously, although the presence of NLSs has not been
reported. Indeed, one protein has been reported to be a plasma membrane
Ca2+ ATPase (At5g57110; Bonza et al., 2000
).
Although this result might indicate the unreliability of using the
presence of putative NLSs to predict subcellular localization of
proteins, it could also simply reflect the biochemical similarity
between plant plasma membrane and endomembrane
Ca2+ ATPases. Another factor might be
that only one bipartite NLS is present in this large protein, which
might lead to a less strict partitioning between the nucleus and plasma
membrane or other cytoplasmic membranes compared with homologs
containing more than one NLS (Table I). Finally, high levels of
expression could lead to deposition of a transport protein in both
plasma and nuclear membranes, similar to that observed for NCC27 in
Chinese hamster ovary cells (Tonini et al., 2000
).
A second transport protein that we have identified as potentially
nuclear has been reported previously as the DND1 "defense, no death" gene (Köhler et al., 1999
; Leng et al., 1999
; Clough et al., 2000
). This cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel (At5g15410) is involved in broad-spectrum disease resistance and the hypersensitive response (Clough et al., 2000
), and it contains three putative NLSs
(Table I). Given the striking phenotype
of dnd1 mutants, it will be interesting to ascertain whether
it is indeed a nuclear protein. Finally, a K+
channel containing a putative NLS (At3g02850) has been described previously as a Shaker-like channel involved in the plant response to
water stress (Gaymard et al., 1998
). Although it is premature to
speculate on possible physiological functions of putative nuclear ion
transporters, these potential examples suggest that they could play
important roles in signal transduction and stress response pathways.
Whether the INM is "simple or complex" (Georgatos, 2001
) is a
crucial question in cell biology that deserves further
investigation in both plant and animal systems. Five INM integral
membrane proteins have been characterized so far in animal cells: the
lamin B receptor, the lamina-associated polypeptide-1,
lamina-associated polypeptide-2, emerin, and MAN1
(Georgatos, 2001
). Although none of these proteins is an ion
transporter protein, it is likely that some will eventually be
identified. This prediction is supported by the recent report of an
atypical P-Type ATPase that is present in the INM of mammalian cells
and that binds to a SWI/SNF-like protein (Mansharamani et al., 2001
), a
finding which reveals a fascinating link between INM pumps, chromatin
regulatory proteins, and possibly gene expression. The tools available
for studying protein function and subcellular location in Arabidopsis
will be extremely useful for delving further into the ion transport
properties of plant nuclear membranes and determining the roles of
these transport processes in nuclear physiology and plant development.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received June 19, 2001; accepted July 1, 2001.
1
This work was supported by the Austrian Fonds
zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant no.
Z21-MED).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail mmatzke{at}imb.oeaw.ac.at; fax
43-662-63961-29.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Bonza MC, Morandini P, Luoni L, Geisler M, Palmgren MG, De Michelis MI
(2000)
Plant Physiol
123: 1495-1505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bootman MD, Thomas D, Tovey SC, Berridge MJ, Lipp P
(2000)
Cell Mol Life Sci
57: 371-378[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Brini M, Carafoli E
(2000)
Cell Mol Life Sci
57: 354-370[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Clough SJ, Fengler KA, Yu I-C, Lippok B, Smith RK, Bent AF
(2000)
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97: 9323-9328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dulhunty A, Gage P, Curtis S, Chelvanayagam G, Board P
(2001)
J Biol Chem
276: 3319-3323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Franco-Obregón A, Wang H-W, Clapham DE
(2000)
Biophys J
79: 202-214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gaymard F, Pilot G, Lacombe B, Bouchez D, Bruneau D, Boucherez J, Michaux-Ferrière N, Thibaud JB, Sentenac H
(1998)
Cell
94: 647-655[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Georgatos SD
(2001)
EMBO J
20: 2989-2994[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Guihard G, Proteau, Payet MD, Escande D, Rousseau E
(2000)
FEBS Lett
476: 234-239[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hodel MR, Corbett HA, Hodel AE
(2001)
J Biol Chem
276: 1317-1325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jans DA, Xiao C-Y, Lam MHC
(2000)
BioEssays
22: 532-522[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Köhler C, Merkle T, Neuhaus G
(1999)
Plant J
18: 97-104[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Leng Q, Mercier RW, Yao W, Berkowitz GA
(1999)
Plant Physiol
121: 753-761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mansharamani M, Hewetson A, Chilton BS
(2001)
J Biol Chem
286: 3641-3649
-
Mazzanti M, Bustamante JO, Oberleithner H
(2001)
Physiol Rev
81: 1-19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pauly N, Knight MR, Thuleau P, van der Luit AH, Moreau M, Trewavas AJ, Ranjeva R, Mazars C
(2000)
Nature
405: 754-755[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Rousseau E, Michaud C, Lefebvre D, Proteau S, Decrouy A
(1996)
Biophys J
70: 703-714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith HMS, Raikhel NV
(1999)
Plant Physiol
119: 1157-1163[Free Full Text]
-
Tonini R, Ferroni A, Valenzuela SM, Warton K, Campbell TJ, Breit SN, Mazzanti M
(2000)
FASEB J
14: 1171-1178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tulk BM, Schlesinger PH, Kapadia SA, Edwards JC
(2000)
J Biol Chem
275: 26986-26993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Valenzuela SM, Martin DK, Por SB, Robbins JM, Warton K, Bootcov MR, Schofield PR, Campbell TJ, Breit SN
(1997)
J Biol Chem
272: 12575-12582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists