Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.

Plant Physiol, September 2001, Vol. 127, pp. 1-2

ON THE INSIDE



    The 14-3-3 Gene Family in Arabidopsis Gets Larger
TOP
The 14-3-3 Gene Family...
Prokaryote-Like Protein...
MADS-Box Genes in Embryo...
Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes...
Stress-Induced Patterns of...
BZIP Transcription Factors and...

Originally discovered as soluble proteins in brain tissues, 14-3-3 proteins appear to be ubiquitous in eukaryotic cells. The 14-3-3 proteins typically bind to the phosphorylated motifs of other proteins and regulate their activity. In plants, 14-3-3 proteins have diverse functions, including the inhibition of nitrate reductase and Suc phosphate synthase and the stimulation of plasma membrane H+-ATPases. The first 14-3-3 protein in Arabidopsis was identified as part of a protein/G box complex and was consequently named "G-box factor 14-3-3" or more succinctly, "GF-14." Nine more GF-14 isoforms were subsequently discovered and designated by Greek letters (GF-14alpha , etc.). Rosenquist et al. (pp. 142-149) speculate that these different isoforms may serve different functions in planta. In this issue, they report on their discovery of two novel 14-3-3 proteins in Arabidopsis, namely GF14o (omicron) and GF14iota (iota). The GF14o-encoding gene (grf11) is expressed in leaves, roots, and flowers, whereas the GF14iota gene (grf12) is expressed only in flowers. The authors speculate that the exclusive expression of grf12 in flowers may be related to GF14 iota's potential regulation of a flower-specific H+-ATPase (encoded by AHA9), which earlier studies have shown not to bind to any of the previously described 14-3-3 proteins.


    Prokaryote-Like Protein Processing Enzyme in Plastids
TOP
The 14-3-3 Gene Family...
Prokaryote-Like Protein...
MADS-Box Genes in Embryo...
Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes...
Stress-Induced Patterns of...
BZIP Transcription Factors and...

An elegant piece of corroborating evidence for the endosymbiotic theory of plastid evolution is that the initiation of protein synthesis in plastids is essentially prokaryotic in nature. In both prokaryotes and chloroplasts, peptide deformylases catalyze the removal of the formyl group from N-formyl-Met (an initiating residue during prokaryotic protein translation) at the amino termini of nascent polypeptides. Peptide deformylases are essential enzymes: mutations that disrupt peptide deformylase function are lethal to bacteria. In this issue, Dirk et al. (pp. 97-107) report on their identification of two putative peptide deformylase genes (AtDEF1 and AtDEF2) in Arabidopsis. Actinonin, a specific inhibitor of peptide deformylase, was effective against both forms of Arabidopsis peptide deformylase. Treatment of Arabidopsis and other plants, including pea (Pisum sativum), with actinonin caused chlorosis and severe inhibition of growth and development (Fig. 1). Thus, in plastids, as in bacteria, peptide deformylase is essential for survival. The authors propose that the overexpression of peptide deformylase in crop plants may render them resistant to a new class of broad-spectrum herbicides based on inhibitors of peptide deformylase such as actinonin. Such herbicides would be completely non-toxic to other eukaryotic life forms.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Actinonin, an inhibitor of the plastid protein synthesis enzyme peptide deformylase, is toxic to peas and other plants (left, actinonin-treated; right, control).


    MADS-Box Genes in Embryo Sacs of Maize (Zea mays)
TOP
The 14-3-3 Gene Family...
Prokaryote-Like Protein...
MADS-Box Genes in Embryo...
Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes...
Stress-Induced Patterns of...
BZIP Transcription Factors and...

Since the isolation of the first homeotic MADS-box transcription factors AGAMOUS and DEFICIENS in the early 1990s, numerous MADS-box genes have been isolated from a wide variety of flowering plants. MADS-box genes are best known as key players in floral development and differentiation. In this issue, Heuer et al. (pp. 33-45) report on the isolation of two novel MADS- box cDNAs---ZmMADS1 and ZmMADS3---from the egg cells and mature pollen of maize. Both genes are expressed in egg cells before and after fertilization. Unlike ZmMADS3, whose expression in the embryo sac is limited to the egg, ZmMADS1 is detectable in all the cells of the embryo sac. During early somatic embryogenesis, ZmMADS1 expression is restricted to cells with the capacity to form somatic embryos and, at later stages, globular embryos. Neither is expressed in non-embryogenic suspension cultures or in isolated zygotic embryos. During floral development, both genes are co-expressed in ear spikelet organ primordia, suggesting that the non-expression of ZmMADS may be critical for the function of organ identity genes. ZmMADS3 is also expressed in stem nodes in a graded fashion, with the strongest expression occurring in the uppermost node. Ectopic expression of ZmMADS3 causes reduced height, reduced seed set, and male sterility due to the absence of anthers (Fig. 2).



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Ectopic expression of the ZmMADS3 gene causes the production of spikelets lacking anthers and having a leaf-like inner glume (arrows).


    Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes Home
TOP
The 14-3-3 Gene Family...
Prokaryote-Like Protein...
MADS-Box Genes in Embryo...
Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes...
Stress-Induced Patterns of...
BZIP Transcription Factors and...

The biosynthesis of almost all the essential amino acids of higher plants, including Trp, takes place in the plastids. Nearly all of the enzymes involved in these biosyntheses are encoded for by nuclear genes, synthesized in the cytoplasm and imported into the plastids. Early in plant evolution, however, most of these enzymes were encoded for by the genome of cyanobacterial endosymbionts (the progenitors of modern chloroplasts). During the course of plant evolution, however, most of the relevant genes left the cyanobacterial genome and become integrated into the nuclear genome. In this issue, Zhang et al. (pp. 131-141) report on their success in sending the gene for AS, a major feedback-sensitive control enzyme in Trp biosynthesis, back to the plastid genome from where it came. More specifically, a cDNA encoding for a feedback-insensitive subunit of AS (ASA2) was successfully spliced into the plastid genome of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). The transplastomic plants, which appeared completely normal, exhibited higher AS activity, a reduction in Trp-feedback inhibition, and a decreased sensitivity to the AS inhibitor 5-methyl-Trp. Most importantly, there was a 10-fold increase in Trp levels in the leaves. As expected, the transplastomic trait was passed maternally to the next generation. This study is the first demonstration of the introduction of a native nuclear gene of presumed pre-endosymbiotic origin into plastids to modify an endogenous biosynthetic pathway.


    Stress-Induced Patterns of Retrotransposon Expression
TOP
The 14-3-3 Gene Family...
Prokaryote-Like Protein...
MADS-Box Genes in Embryo...
Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes...
Stress-Induced Patterns of...
BZIP Transcription Factors and...

All plant retrotransposons characterized to date, including the tobacco retrotransposon TnT1A, are expressed only under very precise stress conditions. In this issue, Beguiristain et al. (pp. 212-221) report that all three of the TnT1 subfamilies differ in their U3 sequences (wherein the promoters of the retrotransposon reside) and that all three are induced by stress in tobacco. The promoters of these subfamilies, however, respond differently to different stresses. For example, the induction of the TnT1A subfamily by elicitors (cryptogein) or methyl-jasmonate is especially strong, whereas the induction of the TnT1C subfamily is more sensitive to salicylic acid and auxins. The direct relationship between U3-sequence variability and differences in the stress-associated expression of the Tnt1 elements present in a single host species supports the idea that retrotransposons have adapted to their host genomes by the evolution of highly regulated promoters that mimic those of stress-induced plant genes. Such variability in expression would be expected to have important consequences for retrotransposon evolution since repeated exposure of the host to a particular stress situation should favor amplification of a particular subfamily.


    BZIP Transcription Factors and Senescence
TOP
The 14-3-3 Gene Family...
Prokaryote-Like Protein...
MADS-Box Genes in Embryo...
Anthranilate Synthase (AS) Goes...
Stress-Induced Patterns of...
BZIP Transcription Factors and...

The basic-region Leu-zipper (bZIP) proteins constitute one of the major families of transcription factors. Arabidopsis, for example, possesses almost 100 bZIP-encoding genes. Within the bZIP-gene family, the lip19 subfamily has been shown to be expressed in flowers and vascular tissue and also to be up-regulated by low temperature. Recent studies have revealed that members of this family are also expressed during the aging of maize leaves. In this issue, Yang et al. (pp. 23-32) extend these findings to tobacco. They report that the products of two tobacco genes, tbzF and tbz17, show 73% identity and are located in the nucleus. The bZIP proteins are shown to preferentially bind to DNA fragments spanning A-box/G-box and C-box/G-box hybrid motifs and to function as transcriptional activators. Transcripts of tbzF are present at high levels in senescing tobacco leaves and flowers, whereas tbz17 accumulates only in aged leaves. In situ hybridization analysis revealed that transcripts of tbzF and tbz17 are localized predominantly in the guard cells and vascular tissue of senescing leaves. Stomata of senescing leaves remain functional well after the mesophyll cells of the leaf have turned yellow. It is possible that these bZIP proteins may activate unidentified genes that function to retain cellular activity in senescing guard cells and vascular tissue.

Peter V. Minorsky

Department of Biology
Vassar College
Poughkeepsie, NY 12604 

© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
H. Hesse, O. Kreft, S. Maimann, M. Zeh, and R. Hoefgen
Current understanding of the regulation of methionine biosynthesis in plants
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2004; 55(404): 1799 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. I. Schroeder
Knockout of the guard cell K+out channel and stomatal movements
PNAS, April 29, 2003; 100(9): 4976 - 4977.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Minorsky, P. V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Plant Biologists