|
Plant Physiol, July 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 1214-1223
Cell Cycle Regulation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Tobacco
Cultivar Bright Yellow-2 Cells1
David A.
Sorrell,2
Margit
Menges,
J.M. Sandra
Healy,3
Yves
Deveaux,
Chinatsu
Amano,
Ya
Su,4
Hirofumi
Nakagami,
Atsuhiko
Shinmyo,
John H.
Doonan,
Masami
Sekine, and
James A.H.
Murray*
Institute of Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2
1QT, United Kingdom (D.A.S., M.M., J.M.S.H., Y.D., Y.S., M.S.,
J.A.H.M.); Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of
Science and Technology, Takayama 8916-5, Ikoma, Nara 630-010, Japan
(C.A., H.N., A.S., M.S.); and Department of Cell Biology, John Innes
Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
(J.H.D.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Plants possess two major classes of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK)
with cyclin-binding motifs PSTAIRE (CDK-a) and PPTA/TLRE (CDK-b).
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Bright Yellow-2) cells are the most highly synchronizable plant culture, but no detailed analysis of CDK activities has been reported in this system. Here we
describe isolation of new PPTALRE CDKs (Nicta;CdkB1)
from Bright Yellow-2 cells and present detailed analysis of the mRNA,
protein and kinase activity levels of CdkB1, and the
PSTAIRE CDKA during the growth and cell cycles. CdkA and
CdkB1 transcripts are more abundant in exponential than
in stationary phase cells, but the two genes show strikingly different
regulation during the cell cycle. CdkA mRNA and protein
accumulate during G1 in cells re-entering the cell cycle, and
immunoprecipitated histone H1 kinase activity increases at the G1/S
boundary. Aphidicolin synchronized cells show the highest
CDKA-associated histone H1 kinase activity during S-G2 phases, although
CdkA mRNA and protein levels are not significantly regulated. In contrast, CdkB1 transcripts are present at
very low levels until S phase and CDKB1 protein and kinase activity is
almost undetectable in G1. CdkB1 mRNA accumulates
through S until M phase and its associated kinase activity peaks at the G2/M boundary, confirming that transcription of PPTALRE CDKs is cell
cycle regulated. We suggest that CDKA kinase activity likely plays
roles at the G1/S phase boundary, during S phase, and at the G2/M phase
transition, and that CDKB1 kinase activity is present only at
G2/M.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Basic features of cell cycle control
are remarkably conserved in all eukaryotes and principal control points
at the G1/S boundary before entry into S phase, and at the G2/M
boundary before mitosis have been identified in yeast, animals, and
plants (Pines, 1995 ; Huntley and Murray, 1999 ). Transit through these
control points requires activated kinase complexes consisting of a
cyclin-dependent Ser/Thr kinase (CDK) bound to a cyclin. CDK activity
is dependent on the cyclin, which also determines the substrate
specificity and the subcellular localization of the CDK complex (Pines,
1995 ). The cyclin is therefore regarded as the regulatory component of the complex, a role reflected in its highly regulated pattern of
transcription and degradation. In contrast to cyclins, there is little
evidence (in yeast and mammals) for the specific regulation of CDK
expression with transcript and protein levels generally observed at a
constant level throughout the cell cycle, suggesting that the activity
of the complex is not regulated by changes in the abundance of the CDK subunit.
In yeasts a single CDK (encoded by cdc2+ in
the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe) in association
with different stage-specific cyclins regulates the progression through
all phases of the cell cycle, whereas in animals several distinct CDKs
have been isolated and shown to function at different stages in the
cell cycle (Morgan, 1997 ). These CDKs are characterized by distinct
sequences within the cyclin binding motif of the CDK, namely PSTAIRE in
the case of the yeast CDK and the principal mitotic CDK of animals.
Plants also contain multiple CDKs, including those of the PSTAIRE type
known as cdc2a or CDK-a, and a novel type of plant-specific CDK characterized by the variant sequences PPTALRE or PPTTLRE, known as
CDK-b (for review, see Segers et al., 1998 ; Huntley and Murray, 1999 ;
Mironov et al., 1999 ). The CDK-b proteins appear to fall into two
subgroups on the basis of sequence relationships (Huntley and Murray,
1999 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ; Joubès et al., 2000 ). One group
contains Arabidopsis CDC2b, snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus)
Cdc2c, and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cdc2MsD, which all contain the sequence PPTALRE and for which the name CDK-b1 subgroup has
been proposed (Hirayama et al., 1991 ; Imajuku et al., 1992 ; Hirt et
al., 1993 ; Fobert et al., 1996 ; Segers et al., 1996 ; Magyar et al.,
1997 ; Huntley and Murray, 1999 ). The other subgroup named CDK-b2
contains snapdragon Cdc2d, alfalfa cdc2MsF, rice
(Oryza sativa) Cdc2Os3, and Arabidopsis Cdc2dAt (Hirt et
al., 1993 ; Kidou et al., 1994 ; Fobert et al., 1996 ; Magyar et al.,
1997 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ; Huntley and Murray, 1999 ). The CDK-b2 group
CDKs have the sequence P(S/P)TTLRE with the exception of Cdc2Os3, which has PPTALRE. (Fig. 1; see legend for
nomenclature of CDK genes and proteins used here.)

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
A, Tobacco CDKB1 structural features.
Numbers indicate boundaries of conserved features; T14, Y15, and T170
correspond to conserved residues involved in CDK phosphoregulation in
yeast and mammals. For details, see text. B, The relationship between
the protein sequences of tobacco CDKs including that of CDKB1;1 and
CDKA;4 (isolated in this study) and other plant a- and b-type CDKs. The
CDKs have been named (both in this figure and throughout the text)
according to original designations; the species abbreviation has been
appended when not evident from the original name. Am, A. majus (snapdragon); At, Arabidopsis; Cr, Chenopodium
rubrum (red goosefoot); Ms, M. sativa (alfalfa); Nicta,
N. tabacum (tobacco); Os, O. sativa (rice); Zm,
Zea mays (maize). The genes isolated in this study are named
according to C.P.E.N. nomenclature (Price et al., 1996 ). Nicta; CDKA;4
is the fourth tobacco a-type CDK described; cdc2Nt1 was previously
presented by Setiady et al. (1996) and further unpublished sequences in
Joubès et al. (2000) . Here we designate the CDK groups by CDK-a,
CDK-b1, or CDK-b2, the protein products as CDKA/CDKB1, and the genes as
CdkA/CdkB1. 1, Colasanti et al., 1991 ; 2, Hirayama et al.,
1991 ; 3, Hashimoto et al., 1992 ; 4, Hirt et al., 1993 ; 5, Kidou et al.,
1994 ; 6, Fobert et al., 1996 ; 7, Renz et al., 1997 ; 8, accession no.
AAD30597.1 cited in Huntley and Murray, 1999 ; 9, accession no.
AJ297936; 10, accession no. AF289465; and 11, accession no.
AF289467.
|
|
Uniquely, plant CDK-b-type CDKs are strongly transcriptionally
regulated during the cell cycle. Transcripts of Arabidopsis CDC2b, snapdragon cdc2c, and alfalfa
cdc2MsD are reported to be present during S-G2-M phases
(Fobert et al., 1996 ; Segers et al., 1996 ; Magyar et al., 1997 ),
whereas transcripts of snapdragon cdc2d, alfalfa
cdc2MsF, and rice cdc2Os3 are only detected
during G2-M (Fobert et al., 1996 ; Magyar et al., 1997 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ). However the abundance of the protein products of CDK-b genes has
only been examined for alfalfa cdc2MsD and
cdc2MsF and for rice cdc2Os3, and only in the
case of the alfalfa proteins was this in a synchronized cell culture
system (Magyar et al., 1997 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ). These results suggest
protein levels broadly follow transcript abundance. Only the associated
kinase activity of CDK-b2 protein cdc2MsF has been studied and was
found to be only present in samples co-incident with the mitotic index peak of the cells (Magyar et al., 1997 ). In no case has kinase activity
of a CDK-b1 been reported.
The tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Bright Yellow- 2 [BY-2]) cell line (Nagata et al., 1992 ; Nagata and Kumagai, 1999 ) is the most highly synchronizable plant cell system and is thus ideal for
studies of the plant cell cycle. Previously, a cDNA of a PSTAIRE (CDK-a) gene cdc2Nt1 (renamed Nicta;CdkA;3 by
Joubès et al., 2000 ) has been cloned from tobacco, and RNA
gel-blot analysis showed this gene to be preferentially expressed in
dividing BY-2 cells but not to show significant cell cycle regulation
of transcript abundance (Setiady et al., 1996 ). A later study of CDC2a
(CDK-a) protein levels and histone H1 kinase activities in propyzamide synchronized cells showed that the protein levels remained at a
constant level throughout the cell cycle but that kinase activity was
cell cycle regulated (Reichheld et al., 1999 ).
Here we report the isolation from a BY-2 cell cDNA library of a PSTAIRE
CDK-a (Nicta;CdkA;4 [accession no. AF289467]) highly related to cdc2Nt1 (Setiady et al., 1996 ) and two closely
related novel tobacco CDKs (Nicta;CdkB1;1 [accession no.
AF289465] and Nicta;CdkB1;2 [accession no. AF289466])
containing the PPTALRE sequence and belonging to the CDK-b1 subgroup,
the first tobacco non-PSTAIRE CDKs to be identified. We have carried
out the first analysis of tobacco CDK-b expression, protein abundance, and kinase activity during the BY-2 cell cycle and show that CDKB1 is
likely to have a role in the regulation of mitosis. We confirm the
potential role of CDKA kinase activity in G2/M suggested by the results
of Reichheld et al. (1999) , and we propose that the functions of CDKA
and CDKB1 however may be distinct due to the different timing of their
activity. We also show that CDKA but not CDKB1 shows activity at the
G1/S boundary.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of a CDK-b1-Type Tobacco CDK
A cDNA library from exponentially growing BY-2 cells was screened
at low stringency with the snapdragon Amcdc2c cDNA, which encodes a CDK-b1-type CDK carrying a PPTALRE sequence (Fobert et al.,
1996 ; see "Materials and Methods"). Twenty-four positive clones
were initially obtained, and after further screening rounds two
non-PSTAIRE clones were sequenced completely; one (named
Nicta;CdkB1;1) was 1,173 bp in length and the other
(Nicta;CdkB1;2) was 1,334 bp. Both encode open reading
frames (ORF) of 303 amino acids, which are identical except for a
single amino acid difference (N60 replaced by H). However, the clones
show significant differences in their nucleotide sequences with 100 nucleotide differences in their 5'- and 3'-untranslated regions and 25 nucleotide differences in the region encoding the ORF. This results in
an overall 88% DNA sequence identity (97.25% within the ORF-encoding
region) and suggests that these clones arise from separate genes. To
confirm this result, PCR amplification of the genomic sequences
corresponding to the two cDNAs was carried out using a common 5' primer
and 3' primers specific to Nicta;CdkB1;1 and
Nicta;CdkB1;2 (details of primers available from the
authors). Amplification of a BY-2 genomic DNA template produced a 3-kb
product using the primer combination specific for
Nicta;CdkB1;1 and a 4.5-kb product using the primer
combination specific Nicta;CdkB1;2. The cDNA clones produced
products the expected size of approximately 1 kb. This indicates that
additional intron sequences are present in the CdkB1;2
genomic DNA that are not present in the CdkB1;1 genomic sequence and
demonstrates that the cDNA clones correspond to separate genes. These
might arise from the two ancestral genomes that comprise tobacco.
Six of the remaining clones did not hybridize to a CdkB1;1
probe at high stringency but were found to produce a PCR product with
primers designed against cdc2Nt1 (Setiady et al., 1996 ), a
PSTAIRE CDK (data not shown). One of these clones (named
Nicta;CdkA;4) was subcloned and sequenced and compared with
the previously isolated tobacco PSTAIRE CDK, cdc2Nt1
(Setiady et al., 1996 ). CdkA;4 was found to have 11 nucleotide differences compared with cdc2Nt1 within the
ORF-encoding region, resulting in a single amino acid difference in the
encoded proteins (E99 replaced by K) and an identity 98.75%.
CdkA;4 and cdc2Nt1 could be alleles of the same gene and therefore reflect genetic differences between cultivars (cdc2Nt1 was isolated from tobacco cv Samsun), or they could
be separate genes with origins in the different parental genomes of
tobacco. Neither the nucleic acid probes nor antisera used in the work
here can distinguish the differences between these clones because of
their close similarity, so we refer simply to CdkB1 and
CdkA.
CDK-B1 Sequence Features and Relationship to Other CDKs
The CdkB1 clones encode non-PSTAIRE plant CDKs,
containing a PPTALRE motif in the region of the CDK predicted to bind
to a cyclin partner (Fig. 1A; Jeffrey et al., 1995 ). CDKB1 also
contains all the other conserved regions of a functional CDK including the ATP-binding region, catalytic domain, and T-loop (De Bondt et al.,
1993 ; Jeffrey et al., 1995 ). In addition the T14, Y15, and T160 (at
position 170 in CDKB1) residues involved in the phosphoregulation of
yeast and vertebrate CDKs are conserved (Lew and Kornbluth, 1996 ).
Comparison of CDKB1 with sequence databases using BLAST confirmed that
it is most similar to plant and animal CDKs (data not shown). A
comparison of CDKB1 with the polypeptide sequences of other plant CDKs
using CLUSTAL X is shown graphically in Figure 1B. The relationships
between sequences obtained in this analysis are consistent with those
obtained using other algorithms (Doonan and Fobert, 1997 ; Segers et
al., 1998 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ). CDKB1 falls into the b1 group of plant
CDKs (Segers et al., 1998 ; Huntley and Murray, 1999 ), showing closest
similarity to snapdragon Cdc2c (Fobert et al., 1996 ), alfalfa cdc2MsD
(Magyar et al., 1997 ), and Arabidopsis CDC2b (Hirayama et al., 1991 ;
Imajuku et al., 1992 ; Segers et al., 1996 ).
To assess the similarity within and between the CDK groups, consensus
sequences for each group were generated from a CLUSTAL X alignment of
the plant a- and b-type CDK groups with human PSTAIRE-containing CDK1
and used to calculate the homology within and between groups. The
percentage identity between the a- and b-type CDK groups is 42% to
50%, whereas within each CDK group it is 70% to 77%. As previously
reported, the a-type CDKs are more similar to human CDK1 (58%
identity) than they are to the b-type CDKs (42%-46% identity)
(Doonan and Fobert, 1997 ; Segers et al., 1998 ).
CdkB1 RNA Is Expressed in a Growth Phase-Dependent Manner
The RNA expression of CdkA and CdkB1 was
compared during the complete BY-2 cell growth cycle. Changes in cell
number and mRNA transcript levels during the growth cycle are shown in
Figure 2. CdkB1 was highly
expressed at d 1 and 3 (i.e. within the exponential growth phase, which
lasts until d 4). By 5 d, CdkB1 transcript levels had
declined substantially as cells exited the cell cycle and entered the
stationary phase. At 7 d, CdkB1 transcripts were not
detected. CdkA expression showed a similar expression
pattern, except that the transcripts stabilized at a higher level in
stationary phase cells (Fig. 2; Setiady et al., 1996 ). The expression
of histone H4 (data not shown) and CycD3;2, both markers for the exponential phase of growth in BY-2 cells, were also included for
comparison. We conclude that CdkB1 RNA is expressed in a
growth phase-dependent manner in BY-2 cells.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Growth phase-dependent RNA expression of tobacco
CDKs. A, Growth curve of tobacco BY-2 cells in batch suspension
culture. Stationary phase cells (7 d after previous subculture) were
subcultured into fresh medium and incubated for 7 d. The mean cell
number was determined daily; the error bars represent the
SE determined from three samples. B, Total RNA isolated
from samples taken at the indicated time points was blotted and
hybridized with the probes indicated. CycD3;2 was included
for comparison as a gene expressed during the exponential phase of
growth (Sorrell et al., 1999 ). The loading control was by methylene
blue staining of the membrane (Riou-Khamlichi et al., 2000 ).
|
|
CdkB1 RNA Expression Is Induced from Early S Phase As
Stationary Phase BY-2 Cells Re-Enter the Cell Cycle
The timing of CdkB1 RNA expression, protein expression,
and kinase activity was investigated as partially synchronized cells exit from stationary phase and re-enter the cell cycle (Sorrell et al.,
1999 ). Stationary BY-2 cells were subcultured into fresh medium and
samples taken at time points over 10 h for RNA and protein-blot
analyses and protein kinase activity assays. Histone H4 was included in
the RNA expression experiments to act as marker for the start of S
phase and started to accumulate rapidly between 6 and 7 h (Fig.
3A), reaching a high level at 10 h.
This indicated that the majority of cells started to enter S phase in a
partially synchronous manner at approximately 7 h as previously
described (Sorrell et al., 1999 ). CdkB1 transcript levels
also started to accumulate rapidly between 6 and 7 h, suggesting
that their expression was induced as cells entered S phase. In
contrast, CdkA transcripts showed only a slight increase on
cell cycle re-entry. Although the CdkA transcripts were only
marginally induced above the level seen in stationary phase cells, the
signal was readily detected (2- to 3-h exposure time), indicating that
they were moderately abundant throughout the time course of the
experiment. An independent experiment confirmed that the increase in
CdkB1 transcripts occurred at the same time or slightly
before histone H4 transcript accumulation (data not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
RNA levels, protein abundance, and histone H1
kinase activity of tobacco CDKs in stationary BY-2 cells re-entering
the cell cycle. A, Stationary BY-2 cells were incubated in fresh medium
for 10 h, total RNA was extracted from samples at the indicated
time points and was blotted and hybridized with the cDNA probes
indicated on the left. CycD3;2 was included for comparison
as a gene, which is induced in mid-G1 in cells re-entering the cell
cycle (Sorrell et al., 1999 ). Histone H4 expression was included to
monitor the entry into S phase (G0, G0 phase; G1, G1 phase;
S, S phase). To control for loading, the membrane was stained with
methylene blue. B, Samples from the same time points as A were used for
western (protein gel) blots and immunoprecipitated histone H1 kinase
assays. The western blot of the time point samples probed with CDKA
antibody is shown above the quantitation of the corresponding kinase
activities (measured in arbitrary units), measured after
immunoprecipitation of CDKA-containing protein complexes. To control
for protein concentrations, a duplicate gel was stained with Coomassie
Blue. CDKB1 protein and kinase activity were not detected in these
samples, although CDKB1 could be readily detected in a positive control
extract (data not shown).
|
|
The protein levels of CDKA were similar to its RNA abundance, except
that low levels present in stationary phase cells (0 h) increased in
the first 2 h after subculturing of the cells, and then remained
relatively constant as cells moved through G1 into S phase (Fig. 3B).
In contrast to the RNA and protein expression, the immunoprecipitated
histone H1 kinase activity of CDKA increased 3-fold between 4 and
6 h after re-entry into the cell cycle at or shortly before the
G1/S boundary (Fig. 3B). In contrast, CDKB1 protein and kinase activity
were undetectable in the 10 h after cell cycle re-entry (data not shown).
CdkB1 RNA and Protein Levels, and the Associated Kinase Activity
Are Dependent on Cell Cycle Phase
The induction of CdkB1 at the G1/S boundary could be
characteristic only of quiescent cells re-entering the cell cycle as found for cyclin CycD3;2 (Sorrell et al., 1999 ) or could
occur in every cell cycle in rapidly dividing cells. We therefore
investigated the expression of CdkB1 during the cell cycle
in synchronously cycling BY-2 cells. The cells were synchronized by
blocking the cell cycle in early S phase with aphidicolin, an inhibitor
of DNA polymerase activity (Nagata et al., 1992 ). After the
aphidicolin block was released, progress of cells through the cell
cycle was followed by monitoring changes in mitotic index and the
proportion of cells in S phase using flow cytometry (Fig.
4A). Changes in the abundance of
CdkB1 mRNA levels were compared at different times during
the cell cycle. As previously described for the closely related
cdc2Nt1, CdkA transcripts remained at an
approximately constant level during the cell cycle (Setiady et al.,
1996 ). In contrast, CdkB1 transcript levels varied markedly
with the lowest levels in G1 and the highest levels in S, G2 (Fig. 4B),
and M phases (data not shown). The same results were obtained with both a full length probe and a 3'-end probe specific for the
CdkB1;1 cDNA (data not shown), the latter being used to
confirm that the expression pattern observed was not due to
cross-hybridization with other as-yet-unidentified tobacco CDK
transcripts. This result also suggests that Cdkb1;1 and
Cdkb1;2 are similarly regulated.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
RNA expression, protein expression, and kinase
activity of tobacco CDKs during the cell cycle in synchronous BY-2
cells. A, Cells were synchronized in early S phase with aphidicolin as
described in Sorrell et al. (1999) . Progress of the cells through the
cell cycle was monitored by following changes in mitotic index and by
determining the proportion of S phase cells using flow cytometry. B,
RNA was extracted from the cell samples at time points indicated and
probed with cDNA probes as indicated on the left (M, mitosis; G1,
G1 phase; S, S phase; G2, G2 phase). Loading control
was by methylene blue staining of the membrane. C, Protein expression
and histone H1 kinase activity of the CDKs was assayed in equivalent
synchronization samples. The western blots of the time point samples
were probed with antibodies as shown on the left. The corresponding
histone H1 kinase activity present in CDKA and CDKB1 immunoprecipitates
is quantitated in arbitrary units and shown below the corresponding
western blot. CDKA kinase levels were determined independently between
three and six times at each time point. The average and SE
of these measurements are shown.
|
|
Corresponding protein and histone H1 kinase activities of the CDKs were
monitored in similar synchronization experiments (Fig. 4C). CDKA
protein levels, like the RNA levels, were relatively constant
throughout the cell cycle except for a slight decline during G1 phase,
but the immunoprecipitated kinase activity was higher during the S and
G2 phases of the cell cycle. CDKA kinase activity remained high until
the G2/M transition, and then declined between 6 and 8 h after
aphidicolin release.
CDKB1 protein levels showed a gradual accumulation from S phase until
mitosis, followed by a gradual decline more marked than the regulation
of its mRNA. CDKB1-associated histone H1 kinase levels showed a sharp
peak at the G2/M boundary, followed by an abrupt decline at the same
time as CDKA histone H1 kinase activity was also lost.
To confirm that RNA transcript levels of the CdkA and
CdkB1 genes show little variation between the S and M
phases, their expression was examined in cells blocked in S phase with
aphidicolin or in mitosis using the anti-tubulin drugs oryzalin or
propyzamide. Stationary cells were diluted in fresh medium containing
aphidicolin or oryzalin and cultured for 24 h. For the propyzamide
treatment, G2/M cells obtained 4 to 5 h after the release from an
aphidicolin block were treated with the drug for 5 h (Nagata et
al., 1992 ). Figure 5 shows the transcript
abundance in blocked, stationary phase and exponentially growing (3 d
after subculture) cells. The histone H4 transcript levels and the
mitotic index show that aphidicolin blocked the cells in S phase, and
oryzalin or propyzamide blocked cells in mitosis. The mitotic block of
oryzalin was less efficient than that of propyzamide as seen by the
higher histone H4 transcript level and lower mitotic index. However,
this lower mitotic index (28%) is consistent with other studies (Shaul
et al., 1996 ) and indicates that a substantial number of cells are in
mitosis compared with stationary, exponentially growing, or S
phase-blocked cells. As expected, the two genes showed very little
variation in transcript abundance between S and M phase blocked cells,
consistent with the results of the aphidicolin experiment (Fig.
4).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
RNA expression of tobacco CDKs in cells treated
with cell cycle inhibitors. Cells were arrested in S phase with
aphidicolin or in mitosis with oryzalin or propyzamide (Sorrell et al.,
1999 ) and harvested for RNA analysis. Cell cycle arrest was confirmed
by determining the mitotic index and level of histone H4 transcripts.
Samples from stationary and exponentially dividing (3 d after
subculture) cells are included for comparison. CycD3;2
transcripts are also included for comparison of transcripts that remain
constant throughout the cell cycle. The loading control was by
methylene blue staining of the membrane.
|
|
Further confirmation that CdkB1 transcript levels are lower
in G1 than in other phases of the cell cycle was shown by
examining its expression in synchronous cells progressing
through G1 and into S phase after release from a sequential
aphidicolin-propyzamide mitotic block (Fig.
6). After release from the block, the
progress of the synchronous cells was followed by monitoring changes in mitotic index (Fig. 6A) and the expression of histone H4 (Fig. 6B). As
expected, when cells left mitosis and entered G1 the expression of
CdkB1 declined, CdkB1 transcript levels started
to accumulate again in late G1 phase 6 h after release and at the
same time or shortly before histone H4 induction. These data are
consistent with the late G1 induction of CdkB1 RNA seen as
stationary phase BY-2 cells re-enter the cell cycle (Fig. 3A). As
expected, CdkA transcripts remained at a constant
level.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
RNA expression of tobacco CDKs in
propyzamide-synchronized cells. Cells were synchronized in mitosis with
sequential aphidicolin-propyzamide treatment (Nagata et al., 1992 ;
Sorrell et al., 1999 ). After release from the propyzamide block,
progress through the cell cycle was monitored by following changes in
the mitotic index (A). B, Cells were harvested for RNA analysis at the
indicated time points. The approximate position of the cells in the
cell cycle at each time point is shown (M, mitosis; G1, G1 phase; S, S
phase). Histone H4 expression was included as a marker for S phase, and
CycD3;2 was included as a comparison of transcripts that
remain constant throughout the cell cycle (Sorrell et al., 1999 ). The
loading control was by methylene blue staining of the membrane.
|
|
In summary, during the cell cycle CdkB1
transcript and protein levels fluctuate, being highest in S, G2, and M
phase, whereas its associated histone H1 kinase activity has a narrow
period of activity at the G2/M boundary. In contrast CdkA
RNA transcripts remain constant throughout the cell cycle, consistent
with previous observations (Setiady et al., 1996 ). CDKA protein
expression also remains relatively constant throughout the cell cycle
and its kinase activity is high for approximately 5 h during S and
G2 phases, consistent with the results of Reichheld et al. (1999) and
declines along with CDKB1 histone H1 kinase activity after the G2/M boundary.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cyclin-dependent kinases play key roles in controlling cell cycle
progression in all eukaryotes. Their activity is regulated through
multiple mechanisms of which the binding of cyclins and activating and
inhibitory phosphorylations are of particular importance (Lew and Kornbluth, 1996 ). The archetypal CDK of yeast is
involved in both the G1/S and G2/M phase transitions and contains the
sequence PSTAIRE in the 1 helix of its cyclin binding domain
(Jeffrey et al., 1995 ) and binds different cyclins at different cell
cycle stages. This basic model is elaborated in higher organisms by the
presence of multiple CDKs, some of which possess variant
PSTAIRE motifs. In mammals, for example, the PSTAIRE-containing
CDK1 most closely related to the yeast CDK is involved only in mitosis, and different proteins including CDK2 and the non-PSTAIRE CDK4 and CDK6
are involved in G1/S and S phase control (Morgan, 1997 ). However, in
general the cyclin partner is preserved as the component whose
abundance is regulated. Cell cycle regulation of CDK gene expression
has not been observed in yeast, although in mammals there is limited
cell cycle transcriptional regulation of CDK kinases (McGowan et al.,
1990 ; Dalton, 1992 ).
The plant cell cycle also uses the same basic mechanisms as other
eukaryotes, but significant differences have evolved in the classes of
molecules and modes of regulation (Mironov et al., 1999 ). In
particular, plants contain a novel group of CDKs, which not only
possess a unique cyclin-binding motif in the 1-helix characterized
by the sequence PPTA/TLRE, but also exhibit strong transcriptional
regulation during the cell cycle (Hirayama et al., 1991 ; Fobert et al.,
1996 ; Segers et al., 1996 ; Magyar et al., 1997 ; Segers et al., 1998 ;
Huntley and Murray, 1999 ; Mironov et al., 1999 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ).
The CDK-b group has recently been divided into two distinct subgroups
(Huntley and Murray, 1999 ; Umeda et al., 1999 ), CDK-b1, whose members
are expressed from S-G2-M phase, and CDK-b2, which are expressed in a
narrower window from G2-M (Fobert et al., 1996 ; Magyar et al., 1997 ).
In contrast, genes of the CDK-a (cdc2a) group have been
found to show little cell cycle regulation and in general are rather
widely expressed not only in actively dividing cells but also in cells that retain the potential to resume division once given the appropriate signal (Martinez et al., 1992 ; Hemerly et al., 1993 ; for review, see
Mironov et al., 1999 ).
Despite a number of studies that have examined the transcriptional
regulation of CDK genes in plants by in situ hybridization or RNA gel
blotting, there has been little detailed analysis of protein abundance
or protein kinase activities during cell cycle progression. In alfalfa,
protein levels have been analyzed in synchronized cultures for CDK-a
(cdc2MsA/B), CDK-b1 (cdc2MsD), and CDK-b2 (cdc2MsF; Magyar et al.,
1997 ). These authors also presented histone H1 protein kinase
activities for CDK-a and CDK-b2-type proteins only during the cell
cycle. The results showed that CDK-a histone H1 kinase activity was
high at the G1/S boundary and early S phase and declined after the G2/M
boundary. In contrast, the CDK-b2 cdc2MsF-associated histone H1 kinase
activity was restricted to samples with a high proportion of mitotic
cells. A limited analysis of tobacco CDKA protein levels and histone
kinase activities in propyzamide synchronized cells has been described
(Reichheld et al., 1999 ). The results showed that CDKA protein levels
remained at a constant level throughout the cell cycle, whereas CDKA
kinase activity was low in early G1, increased at the G1/S phase
transition, peaked during S to mid-G2 phase, and declined in early
mitosis. Here we present the cloning of cDNAs corresponding to tobacco CDK-b1 genes, and examine the expression, protein abundance, and histone H1 kinase activity of tobacco CDKA and CDKB1. This represents the first analysis of the histone H1 kinase activity of a CDK-b1 and
the first study of CDK activity of cells transiting from stationary phase, across G1 into S phase.
Our results show that CDKA protein levels increase in early G1 phase
within 2 h of supplying fresh medium but subsequently remain
relatively constant although with a slight decline after cells exit
mitosis and enter a second G1 phase. CDKA histone H1 kinase activity
remains constant until mid-G1 phase and then increases approximately
3-fold in late G1 before S phase is initiated. Kinase activity
increases further during S phase. These results clearly demonstrate
that CDKA activity increases before the G1/S transition in tobacco BY-2
cells re-entering the cell cycle. Consistent with the association of
CDK-a with D-type (CycD) cyclins in plants and the presence
of CycD-associated histone H1 kinase activity in late G1 phase
(Nakagami et al., 1999 ; Cockcroft et al., 2000 ; Riou-Khamlichi et al.,
2000 ), the CDKA activity we observe may be due to its association with
CycD proteins and could therefore be participating in phosphorylation
of the tobacco retinoblastoma (Rb) protein (Huntley et al., 1998 ;
Nakagami et al., 1999 ). We conclude therefore that the protein kinase
activity of the CDK-a (cdc2a) group is involved not only in
mitosis, but also in the G1/S transition in plants.
During G1 phase, CdkB1 mRNA, protein, and kinase activity
are only detectable at low levels, but using aphidicolin to synchronize cells in early S phase, it is possible to examine the behavior of CDKA
and CDKB1 later in the cell cycle. Consistent with the results of
Reichheld et al. (1999) CDKA histone H1 kinase activity was observed to
be high in S phase and remain high until the G2/M boundary or early
mitosis, when it shows a significant decline. CDKB1 histone H1 kinase
activity, in contrast, does not increase until G2 phase and shows a
narrow peak of activity corresponding to the G2/M transition. Thus CDKA
kinase activity appears to increase from mid-G1 phase and remain high
throughout S phase and decrease at G2/M, whereas CDKB1 kinase activity
appears only during G2 but disappears at the same time as CDKA
activity. It may be noted that the CDKB1 activity declines before the
mitotic index peak, whereas the kinase activity of the CDK-b2 protein
Cdc2MsF in synchronized alfalfa cells is coincident with the mitotic
index peak (Magyar et al., 1997 ). Taken together, these results suggest
that CDK-b1 kinase activity is needed for the G2/M boundary together
with CDK-a activity, whereas CDK-b2 kinase activity is involved in a
later mitotic control. This suggestion is also supported by the later
transcript accumulation of CDK-b2 genes (Fobert et al., 1996 ; Magyar et
al., 1997 ).
The data presented here confirm the value of tobacco BY-2 cells for
analysis of the different kinase activities involved in plant cell
cycle progression and show novel aspects of the plant cell cycle in the
regulation of CDK-b kinases and the activity of PSTAIRE-type CDK-a
kinases during G1 phase.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Isolation of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) CDKs
Randomly primed [ -32P]-labeled snapdragon
(Antirrhinum majus) Amcdc2c cDNA probe
(Fobert et al., 1996 ) was used to screen approximately 5 × 105 clones from a cDNA library constructed in a Lambda Zap
Express vector with poly(A+) RNA isolated from
exponentially growing BY-2 tobacco cells (Sorrell et al., 1999 ).
Hybridizations were carried out at 50°C, and the membranes were
washed twice for 10 min in 2× SSC/0.1% (w/v) SDS at room
temperature and once for 10 min in 0.1× SSC/0.1% (w/v) SDS at
40°C. Selected positive clones were purified by further screening
rounds and the cDNA inserts were excised in vivo according to the
manufacturers instructions and sequenced on both strands. The remaining
clones were analyzed without further rounds of purification, by
rehybridizing with a CdkB1;1 probe at high stringency,
and those that did not hybridize were subject to a PCR with primers designed against cdc2Nt1 (Setiady et al., 1996 ). One of
the clones that gave a product with these primers was subcloned into a
modified pBluescript vector (Borovkov and Rivkin, 1997 ) and sequenced. Sequence analysis was carried out using the Genetics Computer Group
package (Madison, WI) and the Sequencher 3.0 software program (Gene
Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI). The relationships between the
tobacco and other plant CDKs were determined using BLAST (Altschul et
al., 1990 ) and CLUSTAL X (Thompson et al., 1997 ).
Culture of Tobacco BY-2 Cells, Experimental Treatments, and RNA
Analysis
Tobacco BY-2 cells were maintained as previously described
(Nagata et al., 1992 ). Procedures for cell cycle re-entry
analysis and cell synchronization have been described previously
(Sorrell et al., 1999 ). DNA content was determined by flow cytometry
using a Partec PAS-III (Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany) flow
cytometer and Multicycle for Windows software (Phoenix Flow Systems,
San Diego). Total RNA was extracted, separated on formaldehyde-agarose gels, blotted onto nylon membranes, and hybridized using standard procedures (Sorrell et al., 1999 ). RNA loading was controlled by
methylene blue staining of transfer membranes before hybridization (Riou-Khamlichi et al., 2000 ).
Protein Methods
Procedures for protein extraction, SDS-PAGE, and western-blot
analysis are described in Cockcroft et al. (2000) . Antisera was used at
1/1,000 to 1/2,000 dilution and incubated with western blots overnight
at room temperature. Polyclonal rabbit antisera were raised against the
C-terminal peptides ARNALEHEYFKDIGYVP for CDKA and ALDHPYFDSLDKSQF for
CDKB1. An additional antiserum raised against full length CDKB1
expressed in insect cells was also used. Specificity of antisera was
confirmed by peptide competition or by using recombinant proteins.
Immunoprecipitations and histone H1 protein kinase assays were as
described in Cockcroft et al. (2000) using 2 to 3 µL of antiserum.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The authors are very grateful to E. Ann Oakenfull for
substantial assistance with the figures and manuscript, Sarah de Jager for compiling Figure 1B, Professor T. Nagata for permission to use BY-2
cells, and Alison Inskip for excellent technical assistance with some
experiments. D.A.S. and J.A.H.M. thank Nicole Chaubet-Gigot, Wen Hui
Shen, and the late Claude Gigot for training in BY-2 cell synchronization techniques and for the gift of the BY-2 cDNA library.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received September 11, 2000; returned for revision January 8, 2001; accepted March 15, 2001.
1
This work was supported in part by the
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (to J.A.H.M. and
J.H.D.; studentships to D.A.S. and M.M.), by a Grant-in-Aid of
Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and
Culture, Japan (grant no. 12037213 to M.S.), and by Aventis CropScience.
2
Present address: Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff
University, P.O. Box 915, Cardiff, CF10 3TL, UK.
3
Present address: Dipartimento di Genetica, IV Piano,
Torre A, Università di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
4
Present address: Department of Molecular Genetics,
Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Mechanisms in Disease, University
of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, UK.
*
Corresponding author; e-mail j.murray{at}biotech.cam.ac.uk; fax
44-1223-334162.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ
(1990)
Basic local alignment search tool.
J Mol Biol
215: 403-410[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Borovkov AY, Rivkin MI
(1997)
XcmI-containing vector for direct cloning of PCR products.
Biotechniques
22: 812-814[ISI][Medline]
-
Cockcroft CE, den Boer BG, Healy JMS, Murray JAH
(2000)
Cyclin D control of growth rate in plants.
Nature
405: 575-579[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Colasanti J, Tyers M, Sundaresan V
(1991)
Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones encoding a functional p34cdc2 homologue from Zea mays.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
88: 3377-3381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dalton S
(1992)
Cell cycle regulation of the human cdc2 gene.
EMBO J
11: 1797-1804[ISI][Medline]
-
De Bondt HL, Rosenblatt J, Jancarik J, Jones HD, Morgan DO, Kim S-H
(1993)
Crystal structure of cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
Nature
363: 595-602[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Doonan JH, Fobert P
(1997)
Conserved and novel regulators of the plant cell cycle.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
9: 824-830[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Fobert PR, Gaudin V, Lunness P, Coen ES, Doonan JH
(1996)
Distinct classes of cdc2-related genes are differentially expressed during the cell division cycle in plants.
Plant Cell
8: 1465-1476[Abstract]
-
Hashimoto J, Hirabayashi, Hayano Y, Hata S, Ohashi Y, Suzuka I, Utsugi T, Toh-E A, Kikuchi Y
(1992)
Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones encoding cdc2 homologues from Oryza sativa: a functional homologue and cognate variants.
Mol Gen Genet
233: 10-16[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Hemerly AS, Ferreira P, De Almeida Engler J, van Montagu M, Engler G, Inzé D
(1993)
cdc2a expression in Arabidopsis is linked with competence for cell division.
Plant Cell
5: 1711-1723[Abstract]
-
Hirayama T, Imajuku Y, Anai T, Matsui M, Oka A
(1991)
Identification of two cell-cycle-controlling cdc2 gene homologs in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Gene
105: 159-165[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Hirt H, Páy A, Bögre L, Meskiene I, Herberle-Bors E
(1993)
cdc2MsB, a cognate cdc2 gene from alfalfa, complements the G1/S but not the G2/M transition of budding yeast cdc28 mutants.
Plant J
4: 61-69[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Huntley RP, Healy JMS, Freeman D, Lavender P, de Jager S, Greenwood J, Makker J, Walker E, Jackman M, Xie Q
(1998)
The maize retinoblastoma protein homologue ZmRb-1 is regulated during leaf development and displays conserved interactions with G1/S regulators and plant cyclin D (CycD) proteins.
Plant Mol Biol
37: 155-169[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Huntley RP, Murray JAHM
(1999)
The plant cell cycle.
Curr Opin Plant Biol
2: 440-446[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Imajuku Y, Hirayama T, Endoh H, Oka A
(1992)
Exon-intron organization of the Arabidopsis thaliana protein kinase genes CDC2a and CDC2b.
FEBS Lett
304: 73-77[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Jeffrey PD, Russo AA, Polyak K, Gibbs E, Hurwitz J, Massagué J, Pavletich NP
(1995)
Mechanism of CDK activation revealed by the structure of a cyclin A-CDK2 complex.
Nature
376: 313-320[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Joubès J, Chevalier C, Dudits D, Herberle-Bors E, Inze D, Umeda M, Renaudin JP
(2000)
CDK-related protein kinases in plants.
Plant Mol Biol
43: 607-620[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Kidou S, Umeda M, Uchimiya H
(1994)
Nucleotide sequence of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cDNA homologous to cdc2 gene.
DNA Seq
5: 125-129[Medline]
-
Lew DJ, Kornbluth S
(1996)
Regulatory roles of cyclin dependent kinase phosphorylation in cell cycle control.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
8: 795-804[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Magyar Z, Meszaros T, Miskolczi P, Deak M, Feher A, Brown S, Kondorosi E, Athanasiadis A, Pongor S, Bilgin M
(1997)
Cell cycle phase specificity of putative cyclin-dependent kinase variants in synchronized alfalfa cells.
Plant Cell
9: 223-235[Abstract]
-
Martinez MC, Jorgensen J-E, Lawton MA, Lamb CJ, Doerner PW
(1992)
Spatial pattern of cdc2 expression in relation to meristem activity and cell proliferation during plant development.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
89: 7360-7364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McGowan CH, Russell P, Reed SI
(1990)
Periodic biosynthesis of the human M-phase promoting factor catalytic subunit p34 during the cell cycle.
Mol Cell Biol
10: 3847-3851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mironov V, De Veylder L, van Montagu M, Inzé D
(1999)
Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell division in plants: the Nexus.
Plant Cell
11: 509-521[Free Full Text]
-
Morgan DO
(1997)
Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks and microprocessors.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol
13: 261-291[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Nagata T, Kumagai F
(1999)
Plant cell biology through the window of the highly synchronized tobacco BY-2 cell line.
Methods Cell Sci
21: 123-127[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Nagata T, Nemoto Y, Hasezawa S
(1992)
Tobacco BY-2 cell line as the "HeLa" cell in the cell biology of higher plants.
Int Rev Cytol
132: 1-30[ISI]
-
Nakagami H, Sekine M, Murakami H, Shinmyo A
(1999)
Tobacco retinoblastoma-related protein phosphorylated by a distinct cyclin-dependent kinase complex with Cdc2/cyclin D in vitro.
Plant J
18: 243-252[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Pines J
(1995)
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases: a biochemical view.
Biochem J
308: 697-711
-
Price CA, Reardon EM, Lonsdale DM
(1996)
A guide to naming sequenced plant genes.
Plant Mol Biol
30: 225-227[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Reichheld J-P, Vernoux T, Lardon F, van Montagu M, Inzé D
(1999)
Specific checkpoints regulate plant cell cycle progression in response to oxidative stress.
Plant J
17: 647-656[CrossRef][ISI]
-
Renz A, Schmelzl B, Beck E
(1997)
Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding a CDK34-protein kinase (accession no. Y10160) from a photoautotrophic cell-suspension culture of Chenopodium rubrum L.
Plant Physiol
113: 1004
-
Riou-Khamlichi C, Menges M, Healy JMS, Murray JAH
(2000)
Sugar control of the plant cell cycle: differential regulation of Arabidopsis D-type cyclin gene expression.
Mol Cell Biol
20: 4513-4521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Segers G, Gadisseur I, Bergounioux C, de Almeida Engler J, Jacqmard A, van Montagu M, Inze D
(1996)
The Arabidopsis cyclin-dependent kinase gene cdc2bAt is preferentially expressed during S and G2 phases of the cell cycle.
Plant J
10: 601-612[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Segers G, Rouzé P, van Montagu M, Inzé D
(1998)
Cyclin-dependent kinases in plants.
In
JA Bryant, D Chiatante, eds, Plant Cell Proliferation and Its Regulation in Growth and Development. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 1-19
-
Setiady YY, Sekine M, Hariguchi N, Kouchi H, Shinmyo A
(1996)
Molecular cloning and characterization of a cDNA clone that encodes a cdc2 homolog from Nicotiana tabacum.
Plant Cell Physiol
37: 369-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shaul O, Mironov V, Burssens S, van Montagu M, Inzé D
(1996)
Two Arabidopsis cyclin promoters mediate distinctive transcriptional oscillation in synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93: 4868-4872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sorrell DA, Combettes B, Chaubet-Gigot N, Gigot C, Murray JAH
(1999)
Distinct cyclin D genes show mitotic accumulation or constant levels of transcripts in tobacco Bright Yellow-2 cells.
Plant Physiol
119: 343-351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG
(1997)
CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.
Nucleic Acids Res
25: 4876-4882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Umeda M, Umeda-Hara C, Yamaguchi M, Hashimoto J, Uchimiya H
(1999)
Differential expression of genes for cyclin-dependent protein kinases in rice plants.
Plant Physiol
119: 31-40[Abstract/Free Full Text]
© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lammens, V. Boudolf, L. Kheibarshekan, L. Panagiotis Zalmas, T. Gaamouche, S. Maes, M. Vanstraelen, E. Kondorosi, N. B. La Thangue, W. Govaerts, et al.
Atypical E2F activity restrains APC/CCCS52A2 function obligatory for endocycle onset
PNAS,
September 23, 2008;
105(38):
14721 - 14726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Zhiponova, A. Pettko-Szandtner, E. Stelkovics, Z. Neer, S. Bottka, T. Krenacs, D. Dudits, A. Feher, and L. Szilak
Mitosis-Specific Promoter of the Alfalfa Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Gene (Medsa;CDKB2;1) Is Activated by Wounding and Ethylene in a Non-Cell Division-Dependent Manner
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2006;
140(2):
693 - 703.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Verkest, C. Weinl, D. Inze, L. De Veylder, and A. Schnittger
Switching the Cell Cycle. Kip-Related Proteins in Plant Cell Cycle Control
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2005;
139(3):
1099 - 1106.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Magyar, L. De Veylder, A. Atanassova, L. Bako, D. Inze, and L. Bogre
The Role of the Arabidopsis E2FB Transcription Factor in Regulating Auxin-Dependent Cell Division
PLANT CELL,
September 1, 2005;
17(9):
2527 - 2541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bisova, D. M. Krylov, and J. G. Umen
Genome-Wide Annotation and Expression Profiling of Cell Cycle Regulatory Genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2005;
137(2):
475 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Boucheron, J. H. S. Healy, C. Bajon, A. Sauvanet, J. Rembur, M. Noin, M. Sekine, C. Riou Khamlichi, J. A. H. Murray, H. Van Onckelen, et al.
Ectopic expression of Arabidopsis CYCD2 and CYCD3 in tobacco has distinct effects on the structural organization of the shoot apical meristem
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2005;
56(409):
123 - 134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Boudolf, K. Vlieghe, G. T.S. Beemster, Z. Magyar, J. A. T. Acosta, S. Maes, E. Van Der Schueren, D. Inze, and L. De Veylder
The Plant-Specific Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDKB1;1 and Transcription Factor E2Fa-DPa Control the Balance of Mitotically Dividing and Endoreduplicating Cells in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
October 1, 2004;
16(10):
2683 - 2692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. A. Koroleva, M. Tomlinson, P. Parinyapong, L. Sakvarelidze, D. Leader, P. Shaw, and J. H. Doonan
CycD1, a Putative G1 Cyclin from Antirrhinum majus, Accelerates the Cell Cycle in Cultured Tobacco BY-2 Cells by Enhancing Both G1/S Entry and Progression through S and G2 Phases
PLANT CELL,
September 1, 2004;
16(9):
2364 - 2379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. West, D. Inze, and G. T.S. Beemster
Cell Cycle Modulation in the Response of the Primary Root of Arabidopsis to Salt Stress
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2004;
135(2):
1050 - 1058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|