|
Plant Physiol, July 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 1085-1091
Analysis of Flowering Time Control in Arabidopsis by Comparison
of Double and Triple Mutants1
Paul H.
Reeves and
George
Coupland*
John Innes Centre, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
(P.H.R., G.C.); and Max-Planck-Institut für
Züchtungsforschung, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Köln, Germany (G.C.)
 |
ABSTRACT |
Three genetic pathways promote flowering of Arabidopsis under long
photoperiods. These pathways are represented by the genes CO, FCA, and GA1, which
act in the long-day, autonomous, and gibberellin pathways,
respectively. To test whether these are the only pathways that promote
flowering under long photoperiods, the co-2 fca-1 ga1-3
triple mutant was constructed. These plants never flowered under long-
or short-day conditions, indicating that the three pathways impaired by
these mutations are absolutely required for flowering under these
conditions. The triple mutant background represents a "vegetative
ground state" enabling the roles of single pathways to be described
in the corresponding double mutants. The phenotypes of plants carrying
all eight combinations of wild-type and mutant alleles at the three
loci were compared under long- and short-day conditions. This analysis
demonstrated that under long photoperiods the long-day pathway promoted
flowering most effectively, whereas under short photoperiods the
gibberellin pathway had the strongest effect. The autonomous
pathway had a weak effect when acting alone under either photoperiod
but appeared to play an important role in facilitating the promotion of
flowering by the other two pathways. The vegetative phenotype of the
triple mutant could be overcome by vernalization, suggesting that a
fourth pathway promoted flowering under these conditions. These
observations are discussed in light of current models describing the
regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Many mutations that delay flowering
of Arabidopsis have been isolated, but none of them prevent flowering
under all conditions (Koornneef et al., 1998a ; Simpson et al., 1999 ;
Michaels and Amasino, 2000 ; Reeves and Coupland, 2000 ). Genetic and
physiological analysis suggests that at least three independent
pathways promote flowering. These are the long-day, autonomous, and
gibberellin (GA)-dependent pathways. Mutations affecting the
long-day pathway delay flowering under long but not short days, whereas
mutations affecting the autonomous pathway delay flowering irrespective
of photoperiod (Koornneef et al., 1991 , 1998b ). The autonomous pathway
probably promotes flowering by reducing the expression of the
FLC gene that encodes a repressor of flowering (Michaels and
Amasino, 1999a , 2001 ; Sheldon et al., 1999 ). Mutations affecting GA
synthesis delay flowering under long and short days, but have their
strongest effect under short days (Wilson et al., 1992 ; Blázquez
et al., 1998 ; Nilsson et al., 1998 ).
Vernalization, extended exposure to low temperatures soon after
germination, can also promote flowering. This response probably uses a
different pathway from those described above (Chandler et al., 1996 ;
Simpson et al., 1999 ), but in common with the autonomous pathway leads
to repression of FLC expression (Michaels and Amasino, 1999b ; Sheldon et al., 1999 ). The FRI gene confers a
vernalization response on naturally occurring varieties, and promotes
elevated levels of FLC expression (Michaels and Amasino,
1999a ; Sheldon et al., 1999 ; Johanson et al., 2000 ). Combination of
dominant FRI and FLC alleles with a mutation
impairing GA biosynthesis generated a genotype that did not flower
unless vernalized (Michaels and Amasino, 1999b ).
Double mutant analysis has been used to establish relationships between
individual genes involved in the promotion of flowering (Putterill et
al., 1995 ; Koornneef et al., 1998b ; for review, see Simpson et al.,
1999 ). Although the results of such analyses are often complex, they
have led to the formulation of detailed models of genetic interactions
(Koornneef et al., 1998a ). These experiments broadly indicate that the
three pathways described above promote flowering under standard
long-day conditions. Most of the mutations that cause late flowering
were placed in one of the pathways, by demonstrating that double
mutants carrying two mutations within the same pathway do not flower
later than the most severe of the single mutants. These genetic
experiments were extended by the construction of transgenic plants
overexpressing flowering time genes, and describing the effect of these
on the late-flowering phenotype caused by mutations affecting each
pathway (Kardailsky et al., 1999 ; Kobayashi et al., 1999 ; Onouchi et
al., 2000 ). Many of the conclusions derived from these experiments were
supported by analysis of gene expression in wild-type and mutant
backgrounds (Kardailsky et al., 1999 ; Kobayashi et al., 1999 ; Michaels
and Amasino, 1999a ; Sheldon et al., 1999 ; Lee et al., 2000 ; Samach et
al., 2000 ). Although the GA, long-day, and autonomous pathways can act
independently to promote flowering, they converge on common target
genes that act in the early stages of flower development. For example,
the GA and long-day pathways both promote expression of
LEAFY (Blázquez and Weigel, 2000 ), and the autonomous
and long-day pathways both promote expression of SUPPRESSOR OF
OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 (SOC1)/AGL20 (Borner
et al., 2000 ; Lee et al., 2000 ; Samach et al., 2000 ).
Here, we describe a triple mutant in which the activities of the
long-day, autonomous, and GA-dependent pathways are impaired. These
plants do not flower under long or short days, suggesting that under
these conditions no other flowering time pathway can promote flowering
in this background. We compare the flowering time of this triple mutant
with the three double mutants and three single mutants, and interpret
their phenotypes by reference to current models for the promotion of
flowering in wild-type plants.
 |
RESULTS |
co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 Plants Do Not Flower under Long or
Short Days
The co-2, fca-1, and ga1-3
mutations affect the long-day, autonomous, and GA-dependent floral
promotion pathways, respectively. These are the primary pathways that
promote flowering in early flowering varieties of Arabidopsis such as
Landsberg erecta (La-er; see above; for review,
see Koornneef et al., 1998a ; Simpson et al., 1999 ). The three mutations
represent severe mutant alleles at each locus ("Materials and
Methods"). The triple mutant co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 was
constructed ("Materials and Methods") to test whether these
pathways are essential for flowering to occur, or whether a further
pathway can promote flowering when the function of all three pathways
is impaired. Under both long and short days these triple mutant plants
never flowered (Table I; Fig.
1). Over 90 rosette leaves were scored
under long days and over 100 under short days, and the plants were then
transferred to a long-day greenhouse. After 6 months, the majority of
plants had died without flowering, whereas approximately 30% of the
population continued to produce new leaves without having formed floral
buds.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I.
The flowering time of wild-type and single, double,
and triple mutant combinations of co-2, fca-1, and gal-3
|
|

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Photographs illustrating the phenotypes of plants
carrying all eight combinations of the co-2,
fca-1, and ga1-3 mutations grown under long days.
A, Six-week-old wild-type (left), co-2 (middle), and
fca-1 (right) plants. Only the wild type is flowering. B,
Six-week-old ga1-3 plant. The plant is not flowering.
C, Eight-week-old co-2 (left), fca-1 (middle),
and co-2 fca-1 (right) mutant plants. All plants are
flowering, but the double mutant is delayed compared to the others. D,
Eight-week-old ga1-3 mutant plant. The arrow indicates the
position of floral buds. E, Nine-week-old fca-1 ga1-3
(left), co-2 ga1-3 (middle), and co-2 fca-1 ga1-3
(right) mutant plants. Only the fca-1 ga1-3 plant is
flowering, and the arrow indicates the position of floral buds.
F, Twelve-week-old co-2 ga1-3 (left) and co-2 fca-1
ga1-3 (right) plants. Older leaves have senesced. The co-2
ga1-3 plant is flowering, whereas the fca-1 co-2 ga1-3
plant remains vegetative. The arrow indicates the position of floral
buds.
|
|
co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 Plants Retain a Response to
Vernalization
Vernalization promotes flowering of plants carrying mutations in
the autonomous pathway, and of certain late-flowering ecotypes (Martínez-Zapater and Somerville, 1990 ; Chandler et al., 1996 ; for review, see Koornneef et al., 1998a ; Simpson et al., 1999 ). To test
whether the co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 triple mutant plants would flower in response to vernalization, they were given a 7-week vernalization treatment and then transferred to long days ("Materials and Methods"). All of the co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 plants flowered
after vernalization, producing an average of approximately 50 leaves (Table I). Therefore, combining mutations affecting all three pathways
does not prevent promotion of flowering by vernalization.
Study of Double Mutants Enables Analysis of the Role of Single
Pathways
As described above, in the triple mutant co-2 fca-1
ga1-3 three flowering time pathways are impaired and the plants
never flowered under long or short days. Therefore, analysis of double mutants should allow the effectiveness of a single pathway to be
determined in a background in which the other two pathways are
impaired. The flowering times of the three double mutants, co-2
ga1-3, co-2 fca-1, and fca-1 ga1-3, were compared under
the same conditions. The plants were grown under long and short days with the three single mutants as controls, and the flowering times of
all genotypes were scored.
Under long days, the co-2, fca-1, and
ga1-3 single mutants flowered later than wild type (Table I;
Fig. 1). The latest flowering of these mutants was fca-1,
which produced a total of 31 leaves, compared with 20 for
co-2 and 16 for ga1-3. The earliest flowering of
the double mutants was fca-1 ga1-3, which produced around 35 leaves and was only slightly later than fca-1. The
co-2 fca-1 double mutants showed a more dramatic
late-flowering phenotype, flowering after the production of 47 leaves.
However, the latest flowering double mutant was co-2 ga1-3,
which produced around 68 leaves before flowering, and 30% of the
population did not flower during the 4.5 months of the experiment.
Under short days, only the fca-1 and ga1-3
mutations caused late flowering, whereas the co-2 mutant
flowered slightly earlier than wild type (Table I). In these conditions
ga1-3 was the latest flowering single mutant, producing
around 69 leaves before flowering, compared with 59 for
fca-1, 31 for co-2, and 35 for La-er.
The co-2 fca-1 double mutant was the earliest flowering
double mutant genotype. These plants produced around 54 leaves, similar
to the number of leaves produced by fca-1. The latest
flowering double mutant genotypes were co-2 ga1-3 and
fca-1 ga1-3. These two double mutants flowered after
producing around 90 leaves, and 50% of the plants in each genotype did
not flower during the 5 months of the experiment.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The CO, FCA, and GA1 genes act in
the long-day, autonomous, and GA flowering time pathways, respectively.
Construction of the triple mutant co-2 fca-1 ga1-3
demonstrated that these plants do not flower under long or short days,
and therefore that the three major pathways affected by these mutations
are essential for flowering to occur under long or short days. However,
all of the triple mutant plants flowered when vernalized, indicating that vernalization can promote flowering even when these three pathways
are impaired. Therefore, flowering of the triple mutant has an absolute
requirement for vernalization. A recent report similarly demonstrated
that plants carrying ga1-3 and dominant alleles of
FRI and FLC did not flower unless vernalized
(Michaels and Amasino, 1999b ; discussed further below).
The Role of Different Floral Promotion Pathways Assessed in Double
Mutants
The triple mutant background represents a vegetative "ground
state" in which the activity of single pathways can be studied by
restoring the activity of one pathway in appropriate double mutants.
Therefore, double mutant plants in which the functions of two separate
flowering time pathways are compromised can be used to study the
function of the third pathway. A similar approach was used in the
elaboration of the ABC model of flower development in
Arabidopsis by constructing triple mutant plants that formed leaf-like
structures rather than floral organs in all whorls (Bowman et al.,
1991 ). In the analysis of flowering time, for example, the autonomous
and GA-dependent pathways are disrupted in an fca-1 ga1-3
double mutant, and so the flowering time of this mutant will largely
depend on the activity of the long-day pathway. Likewise, in a
co-2 ga1-3 double mutant, where the long-day and
GA-dependent pathways are disrupted, flowering time will be determined
by the activity of the autonomous pathway. Using this approach, the
ability of individual pathways to promote flowering was assessed from the severity of the phenotypes of the three double mutants (Table I).
Using this logic, the long-day pathway was the most effective in
promoting flowering under long days because fca-1 ga1-3 was the earliest flowering of the three double mutants. The autonomous pathway similarly was the weakest because co-2 ga1-3 was the
latest flowering double mutant, and 30% of these plants did not flower under long days, suggesting that in some individuals the autonomous pathway is incapable of promoting flowering in the absence of the other
two pathways.
The double mutant analysis demonstrated that the autonomous
pathway has a relatively weak effect in promoting flowering in co-2 ga1-3 plants in which the other two pathways are
impaired. However, the fca-1 single mutant is the latest
flowering of all of the single mutants, suggesting that in wild-type
plants the autonomous pathway has an important role in promoting early
flowering. Therefore, the phenotypes of the fca-1 single
mutant and the co-2 ga1-3 double mutants lead to apparently
different interpretations as to the importance of the autonomous
pathway. However, these can be reconciled if the role of the autonomous
pathway is not to directly promote flowering, but rather to facilitate
the promotion of flowering by the long-day and GA pathways. This is
consistent with the previous proposal that the autonomous pathway
interacts with both the long-day and GA pathways to promote flowering
(Nilsson et al., 1998 ). The autonomous pathway was shown more recently to repress the expression of the floral inhibitor FLC, and
FLC expression was elevated in an fca mutant
(Michaels and Amasino, 1999a ; Sheldon et al., 1999 ). In addition, the
late flowering of several autonomous pathway mutants has an absolute
requirement for FLC, suggesting that the autonomous pathway
promotes flowering only through its effects on FLC
regulation (Michaels and Amasino, 2001 ). Therefore, the autonomous
pathway may facilitate the promotion of flowering by the long-day and
GA pathways by reducing the inhibitory effect of FLC. This is
consistent with the observation that CO and FLC have antagonistic
effects on the expression of downstream target genes such as
SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1 and FT
(Borner et al., 2000 ; Lee et al., 2000 ; Samach et al., 2000 ). In
contrast, in a co-2 ga1-3 double mutant, the autonomous
pathway would not promote flowering significantly because repression of FLC expression in a background in which the major promotive
pathways are impaired would be insufficient to promote flowering. The
striking enhancement of the late-flowering phenotype of the
co-2 or ga1-3 mutants in the co-2
ga1-3 double mutant suggests that the long-day and GA pathways
show some redundancy, as was proposed previously (Putterill et al.,
1995 ; Michaels and Amasino, 1999b ). Therefore, the comparison of these
double and triple mutants suggests the model shown in Figure
2 for the promotion of flowering under
long days.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Schematic illustration of Arabidopsis flowering
time pathways. The long-day, autonomous, and GA pathways promote
flowering of Arabidopsis under standard long-day conditions, and are
represented respectively by the CO, FCA, and
GA1 genes that are discussed in the text. The autonomous
pathway acts by repressing expression of the floral inhibitor
FLC. The genetic data presented here indicate that these
three pathways are required for flowering to occur, and suggests that
the autonomous pathway accelerates flowering by facilitating the
activity of the long-day and GA pathways. Vernalization promotes
flowering by repressing expression of the floral inhibitor
FLC, but detailed comparison of the flowering times of
vernalized co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 triple mutants and co-2
ga1-3 double mutants suggests that vernalization may also promote
flowering independently of FLC, as represented by the dotted
line.
|
|
Under short days, the relative importance of the three pathways in the
promotion of flowering differs from under long days. The relatively
early flowering phenotype of the co-2 fca-1 double mutant,
compared with that of fca-1 ga1-3 and co-2 ga1-3
double mutants, suggests that the GA-dependent promotion pathway has the strongest effect under these conditions. On their own, the long-day
promotion and autonomous promotion pathways have very little effect
under short days, based upon the phenotypes of extremely late-flowering
fca-1 ga1-3 and co-2 ga1-3 double mutants. Thus, in comparison with long days, the GA pathway has a greater importance, the autonomous pathway remains relatively ineffective in the absence of
the other two pathways, and the importance of the long-day pathway is
dramatically reduced.
The co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 Triple Mutant Flowers in Response
to Vernalization
Although the triple mutant did not flower under inductive long-day
conditions, it did flower after vernalization. This supports the
earlier demonstration that fca-1 ga1-3 and FRI FLC
ga1-3 plants show a normal response to vernalization (Michaels and
Amasino, 1999b ; Chandler et al., 2000 ). The autonomous pathway and
vernalization act by related mechanisms involving reduction in
expression of FLC. Therefore, vernalization of the triple
mutant may be expected to produce a similar flowering time phenotype as
the co-2 ga1-3 double mutant, in which both genotypes would
be impaired in the long-day and GA pathways and have low levels of
expression of FLC. However, 30% of co-2 ga1-3
double mutants never flowered and the others flowered extremely late,
whereas 100% of the population of vernalized triple mutants flowered
and they did so earlier than the co-2 ga1-3 double mutants.
Therefore, vernalization of the triple mutant is more effective in
promoting flowering than restoring the activity of the autonomous
pathway by constructing a co-2 ga1-3 double mutant. This
observation suggests that vernalization may promote flowering by
additional mechanisms as well as repressing FLC expression,
or may more thoroughly repress FLC expression than the
autonomous pathway acting through FCA. The recent
demonstration that an flc null mutant still shows a
vernalization response supports the first of these possibilities
(Michaels and Amasino, 2001 ).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plant Material
Mutant seed stocks were all in the Arabidopsis ecotype
La-er. fca-1 and co-2
mutants were provided by Maarten Koornneef (Wageningen University, The
Netherlands), ga1-3 mutants were obtained from the Nottingham Stock Center (UK), co-2 ga1-3
mutants were as described by Putterill et al. (1995) , and fca-1
ga1-3 double mutants were kindly provided by Dr. Caroline Dean
(John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK).
The sequence of the ga1-3 allele suggests that
this is likely to be a null mutant (Sun and Kamiya, 1994 ). However, the
ga1-3 mutant contains a small amount of GA, despite the
complete absence of the ent-kaurene synthetase gene that is required
for an early step in GA biosynthesis (Zeevaart and Talon, 1992 ; Sun and
Kamiya, 1994 ). The fca-1 and co-2
mutations cause strong phenotypes relative to other alleles at these
loci, suggesting that they are likely to be strong loss of function
alleles (Macknight et al., 1997 ; F. Robson and G. Coupland, unpublished
data). Sequence analysis of fca-1and co-2
demonstrated that these alleles are missense mutations (Putterill et
al., 1995 ; Macknight et al., 1997 ).
To obtain co-2 fca-1 and co-2 fca-1 ga1-3
plants, an fca-1 ga1-3 plant was crossed to a
co-2 plant. The genotypes of the F2 plants
were checked using a combination of PCR-based and phenotypic markers.
The presence of the fca-1 and ga1-3
mutations was analyzed using cleaved-amplified polymorphic
sequence markers that could distinguish between mutant and
wild-type alleles. The ga1-3 mutation was also
identified by the dark-green dwarf appearance of homozygous mutant
plants. A cleaved-amplified polymorphic sequence marker was not
available to test the co-2 mutation, so this was
determined by the presence of a linked (approximately 3.3 cM)
transparent testa 4 mutation that affects anthocyanin
accumulation in the seed coat (Putterill et al., 1995 ).
PCR Markers
FCA consisted of 5' AGA GGA ACC ACG TTT CTC
ACC 3' and 5' CCA GGC ACC CTT GCA GAA TC 3'. After amplification, the
DNA is digested with MseI. This produces fragment sizes
of 317, 239, 112, and 58 bp in wild type (La-er) and
fragment sizes of 317, 239, 95, 58, and 17 bp in
fca-1.
For GA1, wild type consisted of 5' TTT GCG CCA
ACA CAC AAA CCT T 3' and 5' AAG CTT CGA ACT CCA GGT TCT A 3', and
ga1-3 consisted of 5' TGT ATG CAC GTT AAC GAT CAA T 3'
and 5' TTT CTT CAT ACC ACC TGC GTT C 3'. The wild type primers
amplify an approximately 1.2-kb fragment from wild type
(La-er) but will not make a product with
ga1-3 DNA. The ga1-3 primers amplify an
approximately 0.8-kb fragment from ga1-3, but will not
amplify wild-type DNA. Using all four primers in a single PCR reaction,
it is possible to distinguish between
ga1-3/ga1-3, ga1-3/+, and
+/+ genotypes.
Growth Conditions and Measurements of Flowering Time
Plants were grown in compost composed of, by volume, 3 John
Innes no.1: 2 vermiculite: 2 grit. Seed dormancy was broken by incubating seeds on moist filter paper in the dark at 4°C for 4 d prior to transfer to compost. Flowering time was measured under
defined conditions by growing plants in Controlled Environment rooms
(Sanyo Gallenkemp, Loughborough, UK) at 20°C. Short days comprised a photoperiod of 10 h lit with 400-W metal halide power star lamps supplemented with 100-W tungsten halide lamps
(photosynthetically active radiation [PAR] 113.7 µmol
m 2 s 1, red to far-red [R/FR] ratio
2.41). A similar cabinet and lamps were used for long days. The
conditions were the same as short days for the first 10 h, and
then extended for a further 6 h using only the tungsten halide
lamps (PAR 14.27 µmol m 2 s 1, R/FR ratio
0.66). At least 10 plants were used to examine the flowering time of
each genotype. This was measured as mean rosette and cauline leaf
number, together with the SD of the mean (Koornneef et al.,
1991 ).
To examine the flowering times of plants carrying the
ga1-3 mutation, seeds were germinated without applying
exogenous GA. Seeds were soaked overnight in water at 4°C. Embryos
were dissected out of their seed coats under sterile conditions by
applying gentle pressure with number 5 forceps, and transferred to
germination medium plates. The germination medium plates were
moved to the appropriate growth room, left for 2 d, and undamaged
seedlings were transferred to soil.
To determine the vernalization response of the co-2 fca-1
ga1-3 triple mutant, seeds were germinated by dissecting the
embryos out of their seed coats as described above. Plants were
vernalized immediately after sowing on soil. Vernalization was carried
out for 7 weeks at 5°C in short-day conditions (fluorescent light, PAR 9.5 µmol m 2 s 1, R/FR ratio
3.9).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Caroline Dean for providing
fca-1 ga1-3 seeds and primers for genotyping the
fca-1 mutation. We would also like to thank Tai-Ping Sun
for providing primers for genotyping the ga1-3 mutation
prior to publication.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received February 26, 2001; accepted April 9, 2001.
1
This work was supported by a Biotechnology and
Biological Sciences Research Council studentship (to P.H.R.).
*
Corresponding author; e-mail george.coupland{at}bbsrc.ac.uk or
coupland{at}mpiz-koeln.mpg.de; fax 44-1603-450025.
 |
LITERATURE CITED |
-
Blázquez MA, Weigel D
(2000)
Integration of floral inductive signals in Arabidopsis.
Nature
404: 889-892[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Blázquez MA, Green R, Nilsson O, Sussman MR, Weigel D
(1998)
Gibberellins promote flowering of Arabidopsis by activating the LEAFY promoter.
Plant Cell
10: 791-800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Borner R, Kampmann G, Chandler J, Gleissner R, Wisman E, Apel K, Melzer S
(2000)
A MADS domain gene involved in the transition to flowering in Arabidopsis.
Plant J
24: 591-599[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM
(1991)
Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis.
Development
112: 1-20[Abstract]
-
Chandler J, Martínez-Zapater JM, Dean C
(2000)
Mutations causing defects in the biosynthesis and response to gibberellins, abscisic acid and phytochrome B do not inhibit vernalization in Arabidopsis fca-1.
Planta
210: 677-682[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Chandler J, Wilson A, Dean C
(1996)
Arabidopsis mutants showing an altered response to vernalization.
Plant J
10: 637-644[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Johanson U, West J, Lister C, Michaels S, Amasino R, Dean C
(2000)
Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time.
Science
290: 344-347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kardailsky I, Shukla VK, Ahn JH, Dagenais N, Christensen SK, Nguyen JT, Chory J, Harrison MJ, Weigel D
(1999)
Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT.
Science
286: 1962-1965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T
(1999)
A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals.
Science
286: 1960-1962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM, Soppe W
(1998a)
Genetic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis.
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol
49: 345-370[CrossRef][ISI]
-
Koornneef M, Alonso-Blanco C, de Vries HB, Hanhart CJ, Peeters AJ
(1998b)
Genetic interactions among late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis.
Genetics
148: 885-892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koornneef M, Hanhart CJ, van der Veen JH
(1991)
A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Mol Gen Genet
229: 57-66[ISI][Medline]
-
Lee H, Suh SS, Park E, Cho E, Ahn JH, Kim SG, Lee JS, Kwon YM, Lee I
(2000)
The AGAMOUS-LIKE 20 MADS domain protein integrates floral inductive pathways in Arabidopsis.
Genes Dev
14: 2366-2376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Macknight R, Bancroft I, Page T, Lister C, Schmidt R, Love K, Westphal L, Murphy G, Sherson S, Cobbet C
(1997)
FCA, a gene controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis, encodes a protein containing RNA-binding domains.
Cell
89: 737-745[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Martínez-Zapater JM, Somerville CR
(1990)
Effect of light quality and vernalization on late flowering mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Plant Physiol
92: 770-776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Michaels SD, Amasino RM
(1999a)
FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering.
Plant Cell
11: 949-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Michaels SD, Amasino RM
(1999b)
The gibberellic acid biosynthesis mutant ga1-3 of Arabidopsis thaliana is responsive to vernalization.
Dev Genet
25: 194-198[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Michaels SD, Amasino RM
(2000)
Memories of winter: vernalization and the competence to flower.
Plant Cell Environ
23: 1145-1153[CrossRef]
-
Michaels SD, Amasino RM
(2001)
Loss of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity eliminates the late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and autonomous pathway mutations, but not responsiveness to vernalization.
Plant Cell
13: 935-941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nilsson O, Lee I, Blázquez MA, Weigel D
(1998)
Flowering-time genes modulate the response to LEAFY activity.
Genetics
150: 403-410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Onouchi H, Igeño MI, Perilleux C, Graves K, Coupland G
(2000)
Mutagenesis of plants over-expressing CONSTANS demonstrates novel interactions among Arabidopsis flowering-time genes.
Plant Cell
12: 885-900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R, Coupland G
(1995)
The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors.
Cell
80: 847-857[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Reeves PH, Coupland G
(2000)
Response of plant development to environment: control of flowering by daylength and temperature.
Curr Opin Plant Biol
3: 37-42[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
-
Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, Ditta GS, Schwarz-Sommer ZS, Yanofsky MF, Coupland G
(2000)
Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis.
Science
288: 1613-1616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sheldon CC, Burn JE, Perez PP, Metzger J, Edwards JA, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES
(1999)
The FLF MADS box gene: a repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation.
Plant Cell
11: 445-458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Simpson GG, Gendall AR, Dean C
(1999)
When to switch to flowering.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol.
99: 519-550[CrossRef]
-
Sun T, Kamiya Y
(1994)
The Arabidopsis GA1 locus encodes the cyclase ent-kaurene synthetase A of gibberellin biosynthesis.
Plant Cell
6: 1509-1518[Abstract]
-
Wilson RN, Heckman JW, Somerville CR
(1992)
Gibberellin is required for flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana under short days.
Plant Physiol
100: 403-408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zeevaart JAD, Talon M
(1992)
Gibberellin mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana.
In
CM Karssen, LC van Loon, D Vreugdenhil, eds, Current Plant Sciences and Biotechnology in Agriculture, Vol. XIII, Progress in Plant Growth Regulation. Kluwer, Amersterdam, pp 34-42
© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hisamatsu and R. W. King
The nature of floral signals in Arabidopsis. II. Roles for FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and gibberellin
J. Exp. Bot.,
October 17, 2008;
(2008)
ern232v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wu, C. You, C. Li, T. Long, G. Chen, M. E. Byrne, and Q. Zhang
RID1, encoding a Cys2/His2-type zinc finger transcription factor, acts as a master switch from vegetative to floral development in rice
PNAS,
September 2, 2008;
105(35):
12915 - 12920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Wilkie, M. Sedgley, and T. Olesen
Regulation of floral initiation in horticultural trees
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2008;
59(12):
3215 - 3228.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Kobayashi and D. Weigel
Move on up, it's time for change mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering
Genes & Dev.,
October 1, 2007;
21(19):
2371 - 2384.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Eriksson, H. Bohlenius, T. Moritz, and O. Nilsson
GA4 Is the Active Gibberellin in the Regulation of LEAFY Transcription and Arabidopsis Floral Initiation
PLANT CELL,
September 1, 2006;
18(9):
2172 - 2181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Yamaguchi, Y. Kobayashi, K. Goto, M. Abe, and T. Araki
TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) Acts as a Floral Pathway Integrator Redundantly with FT
Plant Cell Physiol.,
August 1, 2005;
46(8):
1175 - 1189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Moon, H. Lee, M. Kim, and I. Lee
Analysis of Flowering Pathway Integrators in Arabidopsis
Plant Cell Physiol.,
February 1, 2005;
46(2):
292 - 299.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Boss, R. M. Bastow, J. S. Mylne, and C. Dean
Multiple Pathways in the Decision to Flower: Enabling, Promoting, and Resetting
PLANT CELL,
June 1, 2004;
16(suppl_1):
S18 - S31.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-H. Lim, J. Kim, Y.-S. Kim, K.-S. Chung, Y.-H. Seo, I. Lee, J. Kim, C. B. Hong, H.-J. Kim, and C.-M. Park
A New Arabidopsis Gene, FLK, Encodes an RNA Binding Protein with K Homology Motifs and Regulates Flowering Time via FLOWERING LOCUS C
PLANT CELL,
March 1, 2004;
16(3):
731 - 740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schmid, N. H. Uhlenhaut, F. Godard, M. Demar, R. Bressan, D. Weigel, and J. U. Lohmann
Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis
Development,
December 15, 2003;
130(24):
6001 - 6012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Murtas, P. H. Reeves, Y.-F. Fu, I. Bancroft, C. Dean, and G. Coupland
A Nuclear Protease Required for Flowering-Time Regulation in Arabidopsis Reduces the Abundance of SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER Conjugates
PLANT CELL,
October 1, 2003;
15(10):
2308 - 2319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Cober and D. F. Curtis
Both Promoters and Inhibitors Affected Flowering Time in Grafted Soybean Flowering-Time Isolines
Crop Sci.,
May 1, 2003;
43(3):
886 - 891.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Weinig, M. C. Ungerer, L. A. Dorn, N. C. Kane, Y. Toyonaga, S. S. Halldorsdottir, T. F. C. Mackay, M. D. Purugganan, and J. Schmitt
Novel Loci Control Variation in Reproductive Timing in Arabidopsis thaliana in Natural Environments
Genetics,
December 1, 2002;
162(4):
1875 - 1884.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-H. Kim, J.-G. Kang, S.-S. Yang, K.-S. Chung, P.-S. Song, and C.-M. Park
A Phytochrome-Associated Protein Phosphatase 2A Modulates Light Signals in Flowering Time Control in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
December 1, 2002;
14(12):
3043 - 3056.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Porfirova, E. Bergmuller, S. Tropf, R. Lemke, and P. Dormann
Isolation of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking vitamin E and identification of a cyclase essential for all tocopherol biosynthesis
PNAS,
September 17, 2002;
99(19):
12495 - 12500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mouradov, F. Cremer, and G. Coupland
Control of Flowering Time: Interacting Pathways as a Basis for Diversity
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2002;
14(90001):
S111 - 130.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. G. Simpson and C. Dean
Arabidopsis, the Rosetta Stone of Flowering Time?
Science,
April 12, 2002;
296(5566):
285 - 289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. H. Reeves, G. Murtas, S. Dash, and G. Coupland
early in short days 4, a mutation in Arabidopsis that causes early flowering and reduces the mRNA abundance of the floral repressor FLC
Development,
January 12, 2002;
129(23):
5349 - 5361.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F.W. Gocal, C. C. Sheldon, F. Gubler, T. Moritz, D. J. Bagnall, C. P. MacMillan, S. F. Li, R. W. Parish, E. S. Dennis, D. Weigel, et al.
GAMYB-like Genes, Flowering, and Gibberellin Signaling in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2001;
127(4):
1682 - 1693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|