Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeLille, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferl, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeLille, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferl, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DeLille, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferl, R. J.

Plant Physiol, May 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 35-38

UPDATE ON SIGNALING
The Arabidopsis 14-3-3 Family of Signaling Regulators1


Justin M. DeLille, Paul C. Sehnke, and Robert J. Ferl*

Program in Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611


    ARTICLE
TOP
ARTICLE
LITERATURE CITED

The 14-3-3 family of proteins has received much attention in the literature during the last 10 years. The current interest is not surprising given the number of diverse organisms in which 14-3-3s have been identified and the important role that they play in signal transduction. Moore and Perez initially catalogued the 14-3-3 proteins in 1967 during an extensive study in which bovine brain proteins were given numerical designations based on column fractionation and electrophoretic mobility (Moore and Perez, 1967). The 14-3-3 family was thought to be limited to nervous tissue and largely conserved among mammals during the late 1960s and 1970s. However, studies over the last 20 years have proven 14-3-3s to be ubiquitous, being found in virtually every eukaryotic organism and tissue (Ichimura et al., 1987; Robinson et al., 1994; Ferl, 1996). In any given organism, the 14-3-3 family usually consists of multiple genes and protein isoforms. Multiple isoforms and multiple functions, coupled with the large number of different organisms that have been studied, have led to potential confusion regarding 14-3-3 nomenclature and function. (14-3-3s are currently designated by Greek letters, with the mammalian isoform names generally chosen from the beginning of the alphabet and the plant isoforms chosen from the end of the alphabet.) The recent completion of the Arabidopsis genome project provides the unique opportunity to examine a complete 14-3-3 family within a single higher eukaryotic organism and to present a framework to codify the understanding of plant 14-3-3 functional diversity and constraint.

The 14-3-3 proteins play key functional roles in many critical physiological pathways that are regulated by phosphorylation. Their role is to complete the signal transduction process by binding to the phosphorylated target, which completes a change in structure that regulates activity. This core functional characteristic is deeply engrained in the highly conserved structural core of the 14-3-3 dimer, which provides grooves for binding two specifically phosphorylated peptides. The primary diversity among 14-3-3 isoforms lies in the N and C termini, with the C-terminal region potentially able to form a flexible hinge guarding access to the central core region (Sehnke and Ferl, 2000).

Plants require a battery of regulators and corresponding responses to deal with complex environmental and developmental changes, a situation that seems consistent with the presence of a large and diverse 14-3-3 family. Localization of 14-3-3 family members inside organelles such as the chloroplast (Sehnke et al., 2000), nucleus (Bihn et al., 1997), and mitochondria (Sehnke and Ferl, 2000), in addition to the cytoplasm (Bihn et al., 1997), further demonstrates both their global regulatory potential and their apparent need for diversity in expression and function. The list of the processes controlled by 14-3-3s includes the fundamental nitrogen and carbon assimilation pathways, which are executed by the light- and substrate-regulated metabolic enzymes nitrate reductase and Suc phosphate synthase (Sehnke and Ferl, 2000). Other enzymes under the control of 14-3-3s include starch synthase (Sehnke et al., 2001), Glu synthase, F1 ATP synthase, ascorbate peroxidase, and affeate o-methyl transferase (Finnie et al., 1999). In addition, the control of the plant's turgor pressure via regulation of at least one form of a plasmamembrane H+ ATPase is accomplished by 14-3-3 proteins (Korthout and de Boer, 1994; Marra et al., 1994; Oecking et al., 1994). Less understood, yet equally bona fide 14-3-3 binding partners include transcriptional machinery such as the G-box complex and core transcription factors TBP, TFIIB, and EmBP (Chung et al., 1999). The specific 14-3-3 isoforms required by each of these pathways has not been fully characterized; however, a conserved mechanism of plant 14-3-3s binding is the requirement for divalent cations to "charge" the 14-3-3s via a structural reorientation of the C-termini (Lu et al., 1994b). It is interesting that only a subset of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 isoforms possess this EF hand-like divalent cation-binding motif in the C-terminal region.

The Arabidopsis genome project provides for the first time reasonable certainty about the number and diversity of 14-3-3 family members within a plant species. The Arabidopsis 14-3-3 family consists of 13 members. Ten of the members (omega, phi, chi, psi, upsilon, nu, mu, lambda, kappa, and epsilon) are well characterized and present as expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and cDNAs (Lu et al., 1992; Lu et al., 1994a; Wu et al., 1997). Three of the members (omicron, rho, and pi) are putative members, having been identified in GenBank as possessing homology to known Arabidopsis 14-3-3s. The omicron isoform was identified by Rosenquist et al. (2000). A cDNA has not been found for omicron, rho, or pi at the time of this publication. Rosenquist also identified a putative 14th member; however, the isoform is badly truncated and would likely not be functional. Thus, we are designating it as a "14-3-3-like protein" (accession no. AC007264). A table of all the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 proteins and genes with pertinent information is presented in Figure 1.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Arabidopsis 14-3-3 gene structures and reference information. Colored boxes represent exons, which are drawn to scale and color coded as to their similarity between genes. The thin lines represent introns, which are not to scale and are shown to denote position only. The light-blue boxes represent 5' leader and 3' trailer sequences. The asterisks identify putative exons, cases where cDNA sequences are not yet available. Current information is outlined to the right of each 14-3-3 gene. Rho, omicron, and pi are the least well characterized of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3s; thus, very little information is available. However, during the review of this manuscript, a cDNA was identified for the Omicron isoform (accession no. AF323920) and a truncated cDNA was identified for the Rho isoform (accession no. AF335544). An expanded version of this table is available at http://www.hos.ufl.edu/ferllab/.

An alignment of the 13 isoforms reveals some interesting information (see http://www.hos.ufl.edu/ferllab/for the alignment). The isoforms range in length from 241 to 268 amino acids. The isoforms all share a conserved core region, with the N and C termini being the most divergent. In fact, the amino acids in the N-termini are conserved to a degree of only 14% and there is very little amino acid conservation at the C-termini (Chung et al., 1999).

Phylogenetic analyses based on amino acid sequence data and gene structure provides a robust tree upon which to hang descriptions of family member function and localization (Fig. 2). The family members break into two major evolutionary branches, the Epsilon group and the Non-Epsilon group. This clear delineation at the trunk of the tree is ubiquitous among plant and animals possessing multiple isoforms, indicating that the initial formation of two isoforms is a fundamental and ancient divergence. The Epsilon group is itself split into the isoforms epsilon, mu, omicron, rho, and pi. The Non-Epsilon group is made up of the isoforms kappa, lambda, phi, chi, omega, psi, nu, and upsilon. The Epsilon group breaks into two subbranches, with epsilon and pi on one subbranch and omicron, rho, and mu in the second subbranch. The Non-Epsilon group breaks down into three very distinct subbranches. Kappa and lambda make up one subbranch; phi, chi, and omega make up a second subbranch; and psi, nu, and upsilon make up the third subbranch. The Non-Epsilon group members contain the previously mentioned EF hand-like divalent cation-binding motif (Lu et al., 1994b).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Rooted tree of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 family. This rectangular cladogram summarizes the relationships among the 14-3-3 isoforms. A human 14-3-3 was included as an outgroup, and essentially roots the tree between the Epsilon and Non-Epsilon groupings. The basic branch topology presented in this neighbor-joining tree is essentially supported by bootstrapped parsimony analysis; however, the confidence of the branching patterns within the Epsilon group is less well supported than the branching within the highly supported Non-Epsilon group. The major branches of the tree are also clearly supported by the gene structures, which is reflected by the numbers of exons and introns as indicated on the branches. Bolded isoforms are present in the chloroplast as well as the cytoplasm. Underlined isoforms are putative in that, as yet, they have not been isolated as cDNAs or ESTs.

The Non-Epsilon and Epsilon groupings are also well supported by intron-exon structure. The Non-Epsilon members all contain four exons and three introns that are highly conserved in placement. Psi, nu, and upsilon contain an extra intron in the 5' leader (Wu et al., 1997). The Epsilon members all possess an intron-exon structure distinct from the Non-Epsilon group, having two additional N-terminal introns. (At present, the pi isoform contains five exons and four introns. The first N-terminal exon is not annotated in GenBank; however, it is present upon inspection.) The genes of the Epsilon group also appear to have additional C-terminal introns. However, the extreme divergence of the C-terminal regions prohibits intron identification based solely on sequence data. Because the omicron, rho, and pi isoforms are not present as cDNAs or ESTs, their structure remains putative at this point.

The complexity of this phylogenetic tree raises an important question. Why are so many 14-3-3 genes present within a single organism? One possible answer is that there is a need to ensure 14-3-3 activity is present in every compartment of every cell of the organism, suggesting that diversity is simply a reflection of developmental evolution and sophistication. Using current prediction programs, there are no obvious subcellular targeting signals associated with any of the isoforms. Therefore, the large number of isoforms is not obviously linked to diversifying subcellular location. It has been observed, however, that unicellular organisms contain relatively few isoforms, whereas multicellular organisms have many and certain organelles contain only subsets of the isoforms (Rosenquist et al., 2000). Another possible answer is that each isoform plays a specific and essential biochemical role, suggesting that general diversity reflects functional divergence. They all share a relatively conserved core region, which could point to the conservation of a general theme, yet subtle changes in the core and the divergent termini could give each isoform its specific function by dictating affinity over a range of possible targets.

The structure of this tree does provide an evolutionary perspective that should contribute to answers to these questions based on emerging data. For example, only epsilon, mu, nu, and upsilon are present in chloroplast stroma, in addition to the cytoplasm (Sehnke et al., 2000), demonstrating that subcellular localization could be consistent with their position on the phylogenetic tree. Omega, chi, and upsilon demonstrate decreasing affinity for nitrate reductase, while phi and psi show no affinity (Bachmann et al., 1996). Isoforms omega, kappa, and lambda demonstrate a decreasing affinity for the proton ATPase (Rosenquist et al., 2000). These examples provide evidence that functional affinity for targets could also be consistent with the phylogenetic tree, but both the localization and function data sets are far from complete. However, the completeness of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 family should provide a well-developed and inclusive framework for comparative 14-3-3 biology.

    FOOTNOTES

Received January 10, 2001; returned for revision January 25, 2001; accepted January 30, 2001.

1 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative (grant no. 00-35304-9601). This manuscript is no. R-07982 of the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station.

* Corresponding author; email robferl{at}ufl.edu; fax 352-392-4072.


    LITERATURE CITED
TOP
ARTICLE
LITERATURE CITED

  • Bachmann M, Huber JL, Athwal GS, Wu K, Ferl RJ, Huber SC (1996) 14-3-3 proteins associate with the regulatory phosphorylation site of spinach leaf nitrate reductase in an isoform-specific manner and reduce dephosphorylation of Ser-543 by endogenous protein phosphatases. FEBS Lett 398: 26-30[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Bihn EA, Paul AL, Wang SW, Erdos GW, Ferl RJ (1997) Localization of 14-3-3 proteins in the nuclei of arabidopsis and maize. Plant J 12: 1439-1445[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Chung HJ, Sehnke PC, Ferl RJ (1999) The 14-3-3 proteins: cellular regulators of plant metabolism. Trends Plant Sci 4: 367-371[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Ferl RJ (1996) 14-3-3 proteins and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 47: 49-73[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Finnie C, Borch J, Collinge DB (1999) 14-3-3 proteins: eukaryotic regulatory proteins with many functions. Plant Mol Biol 40: 545-554[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Ichimura T, Isobe T, Okuyama T, Yamauchi T, Fujisawa H (1987) Brain 14-3-3 protein is an activator protein that activates tryptophan 5-monooxygenase and tyrosine 3-monooxygenase in the presence of Ca2+, calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. FEBS Lett 219: 79-82[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Jarillo JA, Capel J, Leyva A, Martinez-Zapater JM, Salinas J (1994) Two related low-temperature-inducible genes of Arabidopsis encode proteins showing high homology to 14-3-3 proteins, a family of putative kinase regulators. Plant Mol Biol 25: 693-704[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Korthout HA, de Boer AH (1994) A fusicoccin binding protein belongs to the family of 14-3-3 brain protein homologs. Plant Cell 6: 1681-1692[Abstract]
  • Lu G, DeLisle AJ, de Vetten NC, Ferl RJ (1992) Brain proteins in plants: an Arabidopsis homolog to neurotransmitter pathway activators is part of a DNA binding complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 11490-11494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lu G, Rooney MF, Wu K, Ferl RJ (1994a) Five cDNAs encoding Arabidopsis GF14 proteins. Plant Physiol 105: 1459-1460[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Lu G, Sehnke PC, Ferl RJ (1994b) Phosphorylation and calcium binding properties of an Arabidopsis GF14 brain protein homolog. Plant Cell 6: 501-510[Abstract]
  • Marra M, Fullone MR, Fogliano V, Pen J, Mattei M, Masi S, Aducci P (1994) The 30-kilodalton protein present in purified fusicoccin receptor preparations is a 14-3-3-like protein. Plant Physiol 106: 1497-1501[Abstract]
  • Moore BW, Perez VJ (1967) Specific acidic proteins of the nervous system. In FD Carlson, ed, Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Nervous Integration. Prentice-Hall, Inc, The Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, pp 343-359
  • Oecking C, Eckerskorn C, Weiler EW (1994) The fusicoccin receptor of plants is a member of the 14-3-3 superfamily of eukaryotic regulatory proteins. FEBS Lett 352: 163-166[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  • Robinson K, Jones D, Patel Y, Martin H, Madrazo J, Martin S, Howell S, Elmore M, Finnen MJ, Aitken A (1994) Mechanism of inhibition of protein kinase C by 14-3-3 isoforms: 14-3-3 isoforms do not have phospholipase A2 activity. Biochem J 299: 853-861
  • Rosenquist M, Sehnke PC, Ferl RJ, Sommarin M, Larsson C (2000) Evolution of the 14-3-3 protein family: does the large number of isoforms in multicellular organisms reflect functional specificity? J Mol Evol 51: 446-458[ISI][Medline]
  • Sehnke PC, Chung HJ, Wu K, Ferl RJ (2001) Regulation of starch accumulation by granule-associated plant 14-3-3 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 765-770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sehnke PC, Ferl RJ (2000) Plant 14-3-3s: omnipotent metabolic phosphopartners? Science's STKE. www.stke.org/ cgi/content/full/OCsigtrans;2000/56/pe1
  • Sehnke PC, Henry R, Cline K, Ferl RJ (2000) Interaction of a plant 14-3-3 protein with the signal peptide of a thylakoid-targeted chloroplast precursor protein and the presence of 14-3-3 isoforms in the chloroplast stroma. Plant Physiol 122: 235-242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wu K, Rooney MF, Ferl RJ (1997) The Arabidopsis 14-3-3 multigene family. Plant Physiol 114: 1421-1431[Abstract]
© 2001 American Society of Plant Physiologists



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
Z. Deng, X. Zhang, W. Tang, J. A. Oses-Prieto, N. Suzuki, J. M. Gendron, H. Chen, S. Guan, R. J. Chalkley, T. K. Peterman, et al.
A Proteomics Study of Brassinosteroid Response in Arabidopsis
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2007; 6(12): 2058 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A.-L. Paul, P. C. Sehnke, and R. J. Ferl
Isoform-specific Subcellular Localization among 14-3-3 Proteins in Arabidopsis Seems to be Driven by Client Interactions
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1735 - 1743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
M. Alsterfjord, P. C. Sehnke, A. Arkell, H. Larsson, F. Svennelid, M. Rosenquist, R. J. Ferl, M. Sommarin, and C. Larsson
Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase and 14-3-3 Isoforms of Arabidopsis Leaves: Evidence for Isoform Specificity in the 14-3-3/H+-ATPase Interaction
Plant Cell Physiol., September 15, 2004; 45(9): 1202 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
C. Lillo, C. Meyer, U. S. Lea, F. Provan, and S. Oltedal
Mechanism and importance of post-translational regulation of nitrate reductase
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2004; 55(401): 1275 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
D. M. Bustos and A. A. Iglesias
Phosphorylated Non-Phosphorylating Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Heterotrophic Cells of Wheat Interacts with 14-3-3 Proteins
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 2081 - 2088.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Comparot, G. Lingiah, and T. Martin
Function and specificity of 14-3-3 proteins in the regulation of carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism
J. Exp. Bot., January 3, 2003; 54(382): 595 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
G. Noctor, L. Gomez, H. Vanacker, and C. H. Foyer
Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signalling
J. Exp. Bot., May 15, 2002; 53(372): 1283 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
P. C. Sehnke, J. M. DeLille, and R. J. Ferl
Consummating Signal Transduction: The Role of 14-3-3 Proteins in the Completion of Signal-Induced Transitions in Protein Activity
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2002; 14(90001): S339 - 354.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
N. A. Eckardt
Transcription Factors Dial 14-3-3 for Nuclear Shuttle
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2001; 13(11): 2385 - 2389.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. Igarashi, S. Ishida, J. Fukazawa, and Y. Takahashi
14-3-3 Proteins Regulate Intracellular Localization of the bZIP Transcriptional Activator RSG
PLANT CELL, November 1, 2001; 13(11): 2483 - 2497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeLille, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferl, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeLille, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferl, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by DeLille, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ferl, R. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Plant Biologists