|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, May 2001, Vol. 126, pp. 35-38
UPDATE ON SIGNALING
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
ARTICLE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 14-3-3 family of proteins has
received much attention in the literature during the last 10 years. The
current interest is not surprising given the number of diverse
organisms in which 14-3-3s have been identified and the important role
that they play in signal transduction. Moore and Perez initially
catalogued the 14-3-3 proteins in 1967 during an extensive study in
which bovine brain proteins were given numerical designations based on
column fractionation and electrophoretic mobility (Moore and Perez,
1967
). The 14-3-3 family was thought to be limited to nervous tissue
and largely conserved among mammals during the late 1960s and 1970s.
However, studies over the last 20 years have proven 14-3-3s to be
ubiquitous, being found in virtually every eukaryotic organism and
tissue (Ichimura et al., 1987
; Robinson et al., 1994
; Ferl, 1996
). In
any given organism, the 14-3-3 family usually consists of multiple
genes and protein isoforms. Multiple isoforms and multiple functions,
coupled with the large number of different organisms that have been
studied, have led to potential confusion regarding 14-3-3 nomenclature
and function. (14-3-3s are currently designated by Greek letters, with
the mammalian isoform names generally chosen from the beginning of the
alphabet and the plant isoforms chosen from the end of the alphabet.)
The recent completion of the Arabidopsis genome project provides the
unique opportunity to examine a complete 14-3-3 family within a single
higher eukaryotic organism and to present a framework to codify the
understanding of plant 14-3-3 functional diversity and constraint.
The 14-3-3 proteins play key functional roles in many critical
physiological pathways that are regulated by phosphorylation. Their
role is to complete the signal transduction process by binding to the
phosphorylated target, which completes a change in structure that
regulates activity. This core functional characteristic is deeply
engrained in the highly conserved structural core of the 14-3-3 dimer,
which provides grooves for binding two specifically phosphorylated
peptides. The primary diversity among 14-3-3 isoforms lies in the N and
C termini, with the C-terminal region potentially able to form a
flexible hinge guarding access to the central core region (Sehnke and
Ferl, 2000
).
Plants require a battery of regulators and corresponding responses to
deal with complex environmental and developmental changes, a situation
that seems consistent with the presence of a large and diverse 14-3-3 family. Localization of 14-3-3 family members inside organelles such as
the chloroplast (Sehnke et al., 2000
), nucleus (Bihn et al., 1997
), and
mitochondria (Sehnke and Ferl, 2000
), in addition to the cytoplasm
(Bihn et al., 1997
), further demonstrates both their global regulatory
potential and their apparent need for diversity in expression and
function. The list of the processes controlled by 14-3-3s includes the
fundamental nitrogen and carbon assimilation pathways, which are
executed by the light- and substrate-regulated metabolic enzymes
nitrate reductase and Suc phosphate synthase (Sehnke and Ferl, 2000
). Other enzymes under the control of 14-3-3s include starch synthase (Sehnke et al., 2001
), Glu synthase, F1 ATP
synthase, ascorbate peroxidase, and affeate o-methyl transferase
(Finnie et al., 1999
). In addition, the control of the plant's turgor
pressure via regulation of at least one form of a plasmamembrane
H+ ATPase is accomplished by 14-3-3 proteins (Korthout and de Boer, 1994
; Marra et al., 1994
; Oecking et
al., 1994
). Less understood, yet equally bona fide 14-3-3 binding
partners include transcriptional machinery such as the G-box complex
and core transcription factors TBP, TFIIB, and EmBP (Chung et
al., 1999
). The specific 14-3-3 isoforms required by each of these
pathways has not been fully characterized; however, a conserved
mechanism of plant 14-3-3s binding is the requirement for divalent
cations to "charge" the 14-3-3s via a structural reorientation of
the C-termini (Lu et al., 1994b
). It is interesting that only a subset
of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 isoforms possess this EF hand-like
divalent cation-binding motif in the C-terminal region.
The Arabidopsis genome project provides for the first time reasonable
certainty about the number and diversity of 14-3-3 family members
within a plant species. The Arabidopsis 14-3-3 family consists of 13 members. Ten of the members (omega, phi, chi, psi, upsilon, nu, mu,
lambda, kappa, and epsilon) are well characterized and present as
expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and cDNAs (Lu et al., 1992
; Lu et
al., 1994a
; Wu et al., 1997
). Three of the members (omicron, rho, and
pi) are putative members, having been identified in GenBank as
possessing homology to known Arabidopsis 14-3-3s. The omicron isoform
was identified by Rosenquist et al. (2000)
. A cDNA has not been found
for omicron, rho, or pi at the time of this publication. Rosenquist
also identified a putative 14th member; however, the isoform is badly
truncated and would likely not be functional. Thus, we are designating
it as a "14-3-3-like protein" (accession no. AC007264). A table of
all the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 proteins and genes with pertinent
information is presented in Figure
1.
|
An alignment of the 13 isoforms reveals some interesting information
(see http://www.hos.ufl.edu/ferllab/for the alignment). The isoforms
range in length from 241 to 268 amino acids. The isoforms all share a
conserved core region, with the N and C termini being the most
divergent. In fact, the amino acids in the N-termini are conserved to a
degree of only 14% and there is very little amino acid conservation at
the C-termini (Chung et al., 1999
).
Phylogenetic analyses based on amino acid sequence data and gene
structure provides a robust tree upon which to hang descriptions of
family member function and localization (Fig.
2). The family members break into two
major evolutionary branches, the Epsilon group and the Non-Epsilon
group. This clear delineation at the trunk of the tree is ubiquitous
among plant and animals possessing multiple isoforms, indicating that
the initial formation of two isoforms is a fundamental and ancient
divergence. The Epsilon group is itself split into the isoforms
epsilon, mu, omicron, rho, and pi. The Non-Epsilon group is made up of
the isoforms kappa, lambda, phi, chi, omega, psi, nu, and upsilon. The
Epsilon group breaks into two subbranches, with epsilon and pi on one subbranch and omicron, rho, and mu in the second subbranch. The Non-Epsilon group breaks down into three very distinct subbranches. Kappa and lambda make up one subbranch; phi, chi, and omega make up a
second subbranch; and psi, nu, and upsilon make up the third subbranch.
The Non-Epsilon group members contain the previously mentioned
EF hand-like divalent cation-binding motif (Lu et al., 1994b
).
|
The Non-Epsilon and Epsilon groupings are also well supported by
intron-exon structure. The Non-Epsilon members all contain four exons
and three introns that are highly conserved in placement. Psi, nu, and
upsilon contain an extra intron in the 5' leader (Wu et al., 1997
). The
Epsilon members all possess an intron-exon structure distinct from the
Non-Epsilon group, having two additional N-terminal introns. (At
present, the pi isoform contains five exons and four introns. The first
N-terminal exon is not annotated in GenBank; however, it is present
upon inspection.) The genes of the Epsilon group also appear to have
additional C-terminal introns. However, the extreme divergence of the
C-terminal regions prohibits intron identification based solely on
sequence data. Because the omicron, rho, and pi isoforms are not
present as cDNAs or ESTs, their structure remains putative at this point.
The complexity of this phylogenetic tree raises an important question.
Why are so many 14-3-3 genes present within a single organism? One
possible answer is that there is a need to ensure 14-3-3 activity is
present in every compartment of every cell of the organism, suggesting
that diversity is simply a reflection of developmental evolution and
sophistication. Using current prediction programs, there are no obvious
subcellular targeting signals associated with any of the isoforms.
Therefore, the large number of isoforms is not obviously linked to
diversifying subcellular location. It has been observed, however, that
unicellular organisms contain relatively few isoforms, whereas
multicellular organisms have many and certain organelles contain only
subsets of the isoforms (Rosenquist et al., 2000
). Another possible
answer is that each isoform plays a specific and essential biochemical
role, suggesting that general diversity reflects functional divergence.
They all share a relatively conserved core region, which could point to the conservation of a general theme, yet subtle changes in the core and
the divergent termini could give each isoform its specific function by
dictating affinity over a range of possible targets.
The structure of this tree does provide an evolutionary perspective
that should contribute to answers to these questions based on emerging
data. For example, only epsilon, mu, nu, and upsilon are present in
chloroplast stroma, in addition to the cytoplasm (Sehnke et al., 2000
),
demonstrating that subcellular localization could be consistent with
their position on the phylogenetic tree. Omega, chi, and upsilon
demonstrate decreasing affinity for nitrate reductase, while phi and
psi show no affinity (Bachmann et al., 1996
). Isoforms omega, kappa,
and lambda demonstrate a decreasing affinity for the proton ATPase
(Rosenquist et al., 2000
). These examples provide evidence that
functional affinity for targets could also be consistent with the
phylogenetic tree, but both the localization and function data sets are
far from complete. However, the completeness of the Arabidopsis 14-3-3 family should provide a well-developed and inclusive framework for
comparative 14-3-3 biology.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received January 10, 2001; returned for revision January 25, 2001; accepted January 30, 2001.
1 This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Research Initiative (grant no. 00-35304-9601). This manuscript is no. R-07982 of the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station.
* Corresponding author; email robferl{at}ufl.edu; fax 352-392-4072.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Deng, X. Zhang, W. Tang, J. A. Oses-Prieto, N. Suzuki, J. M. Gendron, H. Chen, S. Guan, R. J. Chalkley, T. K. Peterman, et al. A Proteomics Study of Brassinosteroid Response in Arabidopsis Mol. Cell. Proteomics, December 1, 2007; 6(12): 2058 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-L. Paul, P. C. Sehnke, and R. J. Ferl Isoform-specific Subcellular Localization among 14-3-3 Proteins in Arabidopsis Seems to be Driven by Client Interactions Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1735 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alsterfjord, P. C. Sehnke, A. Arkell, H. Larsson, F. Svennelid, M. Rosenquist, R. J. Ferl, M. Sommarin, and C. Larsson Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase and 14-3-3 Isoforms of Arabidopsis Leaves: Evidence for Isoform Specificity in the 14-3-3/H+-ATPase Interaction Plant Cell Physiol., September 15, 2004; 45(9): 1202 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lillo, C. Meyer, U. S. Lea, F. Provan, and S. Oltedal Mechanism and importance of post-translational regulation of nitrate reductase J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2004; 55(401): 1275 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Bustos and A. A. Iglesias Phosphorylated Non-Phosphorylating Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase from Heterotrophic Cells of Wheat Interacts with 14-3-3 Proteins Plant Physiology, December 1, 2003; 133(4): 2081 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Comparot, G. Lingiah, and T. Martin Function and specificity of 14-3-3 proteins in the regulation of carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism J. Exp. Bot., January 3, 2003; 54(382): 595 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Noctor, L. Gomez, H. Vanacker, and C. H. Foyer Interactions between biosynthesis, compartmentation and transport in the control of glutathione homeostasis and signalling J. Exp. Bot., May 15, 2002; 53(372): 1283 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Sehnke, J. M. DeLille, and R. J. Ferl Consummating Signal Transduction: The Role of 14-3-3 Proteins in the Completion of Signal-Induced Transitions in Protein Activity PLANT CELL, May 1, 2002; 14(90001): S339 - 354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Eckardt Transcription Factors Dial 14-3-3 for Nuclear Shuttle PLANT CELL, November 1, 2001; 13(11): 2385 - 2389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Igarashi, S. Ishida, J. Fukazawa, and Y. Takahashi 14-3-3 Proteins Regulate Intracellular Localization of the bZIP Transcriptional Activator RSG PLANT CELL, November 1, 2001; 13(11): 2483 - 2497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|