|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiol, October 1999, Vol. 121, pp. 325-332
UPDATE ON PLANT-INSECT INTERACTIONS
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Leaves normally release small
quantities of volatile chemicals, but when a plant is damaged by
herbivorous insects, many more volatiles are released. The chemical
identity of the volatile compounds varies with the plant species and
with the herbivorous insect species. These volatiles attract both
parasitic and predatory insects that are natural enemies of the
herbivores. They may also induce defense responses in neighboring
plants. Such chemicals, which function in communication between and
among species, as well as those that serve as messengers between
members of the same species, are called semiochemicals (from the Greek
"semeion," a mark or signal) (Law and Regnier, 1971
).
Semiochemicals emitted from a diverse group of plants and insects
mediate key processes in the behavior of specific insects. Volatile
phytochemicals can serve as airborne semiochemicals, promoting or
deterring interactions between plants and insect herbivores. For
example, wheat seedlings without herbivore damage attract aphids,
whereas odors released from wheat seedlings with a high density
of aphids repel other aphids (Quiroz et al., 1997
). For swallowtail
butterflies, volatiles from host plants enhance the effect of contact
stimulants, increasing landing rates and oviposition relative to
non-host plants (Feeny et al., 1989
).
In addition to the bouquet of compounds that render leaves attractive
or disagreeable to herbivores, volatile terpenoids and other compounds
emitted from leaves in response to insect damage allow insect
parasitoids (such as parasitic wasps) and predators to distinguish
between infested and noninfested plants, and thus aid in locating hosts
or prey (Fig. 1). These phytodistress
signals, which result in an active interaction between
herbivore-damaged plants and a third trophic level, have been described
for several agro-ecosystems. Examples include lima bean and apple
plants, which produce volatiles that attract predatory mites when
damaged by spider mites (Takabayashi and Dicke, 1996
), and corn and
cotton plants, which release volatiles that attract hymenopterous
parasitoids that attack larvae of several Lepidoptera species
(Tumlinson et al., 1993
). In the latter case, a parasitoid female
injects her eggs when she stings, and the eggs hatch into wasp
larvae inside the caterpillar. Once the caterpillar has been stung,
its reproductive cycle is terminated and a new generation of wasps
is produced.
|
In all plants reported thus far, there are notable similarities in the structure of the volatile compounds that are emitted from insect-damaged leaves and from leaves distal to the site of damage. The structural uniformity in the chemical emissions from different plants with insect feeding suggests the activation of a common set of biosynthetic pathways shared by a wide range of plant families, and that the products are detectable to a broad spectrum of insect parasitoids and predators (Fig. 2). The ability of host-seeking insects to recognize and respond to such chemical cues and differentiate them from background odors indicates that insect-damaged plants emit volatile chemicals that are clearly distinguishable from those released in response to other types of damage or those released from undamaged plants. The plant's ability to differentiate between herbivore damage and a general wound response suggests the presence of elicitors associated with insect feeding that are absent from other types of leaf damage.
|
| |
PLANTS RESPOND TO INSECT FEEDING DAMAGE BY RELEASING GREATER AMOUNTS OF A VARIETY OF VOLATILES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An undamaged plant maintains a baseline level of volatile
metabolites that are released from the surface of the leaf and/or from
accumulated storage sites in the leaf. These constitutive chemical
reserves, which often include monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and
aromatics, accumulate to high levels in specialized glands or trichomes
(Paré and Tumlinson, 1997a
). In addition, green-leaf odors
consisting of a blend of saturated and unsaturated six-carbon alcohols,
aldehydes, and esters are produced by autolytic oxidative breakdown of
membrane lipids and are released when leaves are mechanically damaged.
This pattern of constitutive compounds has been analyzed in the field
for perennials, including beech (Tollsten and Müller, 1996
) and
ash (Markovic et al., 1996
) trees, as well as under greenhouse
conditions for many herbaceous annuals, including brussels sprouts
(Mattiacci et al., 1994
) and cucumber (Takabayashi et al., 1994
).
Plants respond to insect feeding damage by releasing a variety of
volatiles from the damaged site, and the profile of the volatiles
emitted is markedly different from those of undamaged or mechanically
damaged plants. In cotton, breakage of leaf glands causes stored
terpenes to be re-leased in much higher levels, and the emissions
of lipoxygenase pathway green-leaf volatiles are also increased.
While the release of these metabolites correlates closely with leaf
damage from insect feeding (Loughrin et al., 1994
), a subset of
terpenes, the nitrogen-containing compound indole, and hexenyl acetate
are also released in much higher levels with insect feeding, but
in a diurnal cycle that is decoupled from short-term insect damage.
These compounds, linalool and (E)-
-ocimene (monoterpenes), (E,E)-
-farnesene and
(E)-
-farnesene (sesquiterpenes), nonatriene and
tridecatetraene (homoterpenes), and indole and (Z)-3-hexenyl
acetate, have an emissions profile more similar to the light cycle,
with low emissions at night and high levels during the periods of
maximal photosynthesis.
Chemical labeling studies have established that the compounds released
in much greater quantities during the day and specifically in response
to insect damage are synthesized de novo and are not stored in the
plant (Paré and Tumlinson, 1997b
). These induced compounds
rapidly incorporate a high level of label when plants damaged by
feeding caterpillars are held in volatile collection chambers under an
atmosphere containing
13C-CO2. The high
incorporation of 13C detected by mass spectral
analysis, and the rapid turnover of this label in experiments where
short pulses of 13C-CO2
were used indicate that its production is tightly coupled with
photosynthesis. A consistent, several-hour delay between when insect
feeding begins and emission of the induced volatiles supports the
hypothesis that a series of biochemical reactions, including gene
expression, protein assembly, and/or enzyme induction, is required for
the synthesis and release of these compounds.
| |
RELEASE OF VOLATILES FROM UNDAMAGED LEAVES OF A DAMAGED PLANT INDICATES A SYSTEMIC SIGNAL |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to the release of volatiles at the site of herbivore
feeding, analysis of volatile emissions from unharmed leaves of
insect-damaged plants has established that there is a systemic response. In both corn (Turlings and Tumlinson, 1992
) and cotton (Röse et al., 1996
), leaves distal to the site of herbivore
feeding showed an increase in the release of volatiles. The chemical
blend of volatiles from undamaged cotton leaves differs from the
volatiles collected from the entire plant. The products of the
lipoxygenase pathway, including the hexenals and hexenols, which are
released from freshly cut or damaged tissue, are not detected in the
systemically released volatiles, with the exception of
(Z)-3-hexenyl acetate. One explanation is that these
six-carbon compounds can only be released from undamaged leaf tissue
when they are converted to the acetate form (Paré and Tumlinson,
1998
).
The activation of the lipoxygenase pathway in undamaged leaves suggests
a mechanism analogous to that proposed by Farmer and Ryan (1992)
,
wherein a mobile signal such as systemin can transmit information from
the damaged site to distal leaves, triggering the lipoxygenase pathway
and resulting in a cascade of signals activating several defense
responses in plants. Some of the monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, as
well as indole and isomeric hexenyl butyrates and 2-methyl butyrates,
are also only released from damaged leaves (Röse et al., 1996
).
The induced terpenoids that are synthesized de novo in cotton leaves in
response to herbivore damage are also released systemically from
undamaged leaves of a caterpillar-damaged plant. Chemical labeling
experiments established that the systemic volatiles are synthesized at
the site of release, suggesting that a mobile chemical messenger is
transported from the damage location to distal, undamaged leaves to
trigger synthesis and volatile release (Paré and Tumlinson,
1998
).
Chemical labeling experiments using herbivore-damaged plants in combination with an analysis of the volatiles released has only been reported for cotton. However, since many of the compounds emitted from corn during the day have also been shown to be induced in cotton, and the quantities released increase with increased light intensity, it can be speculated that these volatiles are also synthesized de novo in corn plants. It is interesting that similar compounds are emitted in response to insect herbivore damage in several agricultural species, including cucumber, apple, lima bean, corn, and cotton (see Table I). Both among individual plants of the same species and between different plant species, whether the blend of volatile compounds is induced through a common signaling pathway or if their emissions are triggered by different signaling mechanisms is not yet known.
|
| |
THE SYNTHESIS OF VOLATILES HAS A HIGH METABOLIC COST |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Terpenes are an important source of olefinic compounds involved in
the formation of phytotoxic products. For example, in conifers (Buchbauer et al., 1994
) and broadleaf tree species (Monson and Fall,
1989
), an array of terpene hydrocarbons are released from plants during
times of photosynthesis. These naturally produced isoprenoids are known
to form photooxidants and ozone in combination with nitrogen oxides. As
a result, increased amounts of terpenes can act as pollutants,
increasing the stress to the plant. The metabolic cost of these
phytochemical emissions can also be high. In particular, terpenoids are
more expensive to manufacture per gram than most other primary and
secondary metabolites due to the need for extensive chemical reduction
(Gershenzon, 1994
). Defensive compound production costs in terms of
reproductive success can depend on the level of herbivory. When
herbivore levels are low, chemically induced wild-type tobacco plants
produce fewer seeds than their noninduced counterparts. With
intermediate herbivory, chemically induced plants experience less
feeding on the foliage and have a higher fitness level than noninduced,
insect-damaged control plants (Baldwin, 1998
; Mitchell-Olds et al.,
1998
). It appears that volatiles need to be judiciously synthesized and safely stored, as increased synthesis can be costly and potentially toxic to the plant. However, decreases in terpene accumulation may make
an individual plant more vulnerable to insect pest attacks or
temperature stress.
With or without insect feeding, plants usually release a variety of
terpenes during periods of high temperature. Although the biological
function of terpene production is not fully understood, one proposed
explanation for these emissions is that it is a strategy for responding
to high temperatures (Mlot, 1995
). It has been suggested that
fat-soluble hydrocarbons dissolve into the thylakoid membrane and keep
the chloroplast from degrading when temperatures exceed the plant's
biological optimum. These hydrocarbons evaporate as the temperature
rises, so that terpene volatilization cools the chloroplasts. However,
since the evaporative cooling of terpenes is relatively small compared
with a solvent such as water, this explanation is not universally accepted.
| |
VOLATILES FROM INSECT-DAMAGED PLANTS ATTRACT NATURAL ENEMIES OF THE HERBIVORES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The task for a female parasitoid to locate lepidopteran
caterpillar hosts would most often be unproductive if she were simply to rely on visual cues. Unlike insect pollinators seeking out well-marked flower targets, parasitoids are searching for small herbivores that are often well camouflaged and mostly inhabit the
undersides of leaves. Therefore, the chances of parasitoids finding
hosts by random searching are remote. Both McCall et al. (1993)
and
Steinberg et al. (1993)
have shown by wind tunnel flights and GC
analysis the weak allure and low abundance that herbivore odors alone
provide for parasitoids. In contrast, the chemicals released from
herbivore-damaged plants appear to contain critical chemical
information that draws parasitoids to air streams spiked with these
plant odors in the laboratory and to damaged plants placed among a
group of undamaged neighbors in the field.
To examine whether systemically released chemicals alone provide
sufficient chemical cues to attract parasitic wasps, herbivore-damaged leaves were removed immediately before flight tests. Wind tunnel experiments showed that systemically released components were detectable at levels sufficient to direct parasitoids to their hosts
(Cortesero et al., 1997
). In cotton and tobacco field trials using
female wasps (Cardiochiles nigriceps), the ratio of landings on host (tobacco budworm) damaged versus undamaged plants was high:
approximately 95% to 5%, respectively, in systemic or whole-plant volatile emissions (De Moraes et al., 1998
). Interestingly, this specialist parasitic wasp, using chemical cues released by the plant,
can distinguish plants infested by her host Heliothis
virescens from those infested by Helicoverpa zea, a
closely related, non-host herbivore species. In tobacco, cotton, and
maize, each plant produces a herbivore-specific blend of volatile
components in response to a particular herbivore species feeding on the
leaves, and these differences are observable by GC chemical analyses
and detectable by parasitic wasps.
| |
PARASITIC WASPS LEARN CHEMICAL CUES ASSOCIATED WITH HOSTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the volatile compounds released by insect herbivore
damage are similar among the several plant species studied thus far,
the specific blends are quite distinct, varying in both the number of
compounds and the actual structures produced. Thus, the task of finding
a host is more complicated for the parasitoid when the host feeds on
several different plant species. The wasps have overcome this obstacle
by developing the ability to learn chemical cues associated with the
presence of a host (Lewis and Tumlinson, 1988
). The chemicals to which
a female wasp is exposed during interactions with her host familiarize
her with particular host location cues. A successful host experience
increases the wasp's responsiveness to host-associated chemicals. For
example, an oviposition experience on the plant-host complex
significantly increases the oriented flight and landing responses of
females of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi relative to
those that aren't allowed to sting but that are exposed to undamaged
or host-damaged plants (Du et al., 1997
). This underscores the
importance of the oviposition experience in combination with
host-damaged plant cues. Interestingly, female wasps can also learn
volatile odors associated with food sources and use them to locate
necessary food (Lewis and Takasu, 1990
).
| |
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS MODULATE VOLATILE EMISSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differences in the amount of volatiles released by individual
plants can vary with environmental conditions that influence the
plant's physiology. Several species, including corn, cotton, and lima
bean, respond to reduced light (due to either lower light intensity or
shorter daylength) with a decline in the release of herbivore-induced
volatiles. Based on studies with lima bean, water stress also seems to
directly affect volatile release (Takabayashi et al., 1994
). With less
water available for the plant, elevated levels of volatiles are
released from infested individuals relative to non-water-stressed
controls. Correlating this with insect preference showed that predatory
mites selected plants that were infested and water-stressed over those
that were infested but not water-stressed (Takabayashi et al., 1994
).
The addition of high levels of mineral and/or organic nitrogen
fertilizers significantly decreased the constitutive volatiles
extracted from celery (Van Wassenhove et al., 1990
). With volatile
analysis and flight studies for plants under different nutritional
conditions, the role of these volatiles in attracting wasps to their
herbivore hosts may be more clearly assigned.
| |
ENZYMES AND ELICITORS FROM INSECT HERBIVORES TRIGGER VOLATILE RELEASE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key to the emissions of plant signals for the foraging success of
parasitoids are substances in the oral secretion of herbivores. Recent
work suggests that volatile emissions and other plant defense responses
are potentiated by a component or components associated with the
feeding herbivore that allows the plant to differentiate between
general wounding and damage due to chewing insects. In cotton, induced
volatiles that are synthesized in response to wounding are released in
greater quantities as a result of caterpillar feeding than as a result
of mechanical damage alone (Paré and Tumlinson, 1997a
). In
tobacco, higher concentrations of the defense-signaling molecule
jasmonic acid result from herbivore damage by hornworm caterpillars
than from mechanical damage designed to mimic herbivory (McCloud and
Baldwin, 1998
). At the transcriptional level, potato mRNAs involved in
plant defense accumulate more rapidly with insect-derived elicitor(s)
in contact with the damaged leaves than with mechanical damage alone
(Korth and Dixon, 1997
).
Thus far, two oral secretion products from chewing insects have been
identified that augment the release of plant volatiles. A
-glucosidase present in the regurgitant of Pieris
brassicae caterpillars triggers the same emissions of volatiles in
cabbage plants as induced by feeding caterpillars (Mattiacci et al.,
1995
). Since enzyme activity in the regurgitant is retained when
caterpillars are fed a
-glucosidase-free diet, enzyme activity does
not appear to be plant derived. Presumably, the enzyme acts to cleave
sugars coupled to organic compounds that then become more volatile and are released. In contrast, a low-Mr
fatty acid derivative,
N-(17-hydroxylinolenoyl)-L-Gln (volicitin), has been identified from the oral secretions of beet armyworm caterpillars and induces corn seedlings to release volatile chemical signals (Alborn et al., 1997
).
Analysis of volicitin from beet armyworms fed
13C-labeled corn seedlings demonstrated that the
caterpillar synthesizes this elicitor by adding a hydroxyl group and
Gln to linolenic acid obtained directly from the plant on which the
caterpillar feeds (Paré et al., 1998
). Thus, although the
precursor of volicitin is obtained from plants, the bioactive product
has only been found in the caterpillar. This strongly suggests that
these molecules play an important yet still unknown role in metabolism
or some other process critical to the life of the herbivorous insects. Although it is known that the plant provides linolenic acid, which is
essential for most lepidopteran larvae (Stanley-Samuelson, 1994
), it is
seemingly detrimental to the insect to chemically convert this fatty
acid into an elicitor that triggers plant defense. The full
implications of this are not yet understood.
It has been suggested that jasmonic acid, which is produced from
linolenic acid by the octadecanoid signaling pathway (see Fig.
3), is a key regulatory component in the
transduction sequence that triggers synthesis and release of volatile
compounds by plants (Krumm et al., 1995
). Jasmonates also stimulate
other physiological and defensive processes in plants (Farmer and Ryan,
1992
), and the amino acid conjugates of jasmonic acid are involved in
physiological and developmental processes in many plants (Kramell et
al., 1995
). Therefore, the structure of volicitin, an octadecatrienoate
conjugated to an amino acid, suggests that the elicitor molecule
interacts with the octadecanoid pathway in herbivore-damaged plants.
|
| |
THE MECHANISMS THAT REGULATE THE SYNTHESIS AND RELEASE OF PLANT VOLATILES ARE POORLY UNDERSTOOD |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is still much to learn about the chemical interactions between plants and insect herbivores that lead to the synthesis and release of volatiles by the plants. Only one herbivore-specific volatile elicitor, volicitin, has been identified, but we know from preliminary investigations of the chemistry and activity of oral secretions of other insect herbivores that other compounds, some analogous in structure to volicitin, are also active. Furthermore, damage of a plant by different herbivore species can induce the release of volatile blends with different proportions of constituents. Thus, distinct responses are induced by elicitors of different structures from different herbivore species. However, we don't know the biochemical mechanisms by which these elicitors trigger biosynthesis and release of plant volatiles. Do they interact with the octadecanoid signaling pathway, and if so, how? Do they regulate the release of linolenic acid, the production of jasmonic acid, or the activation of the oxidative burst, all of which are associated with the wounding of plant tissue? Also, we have no knowledge of the mechanism leading to the systemic release of volatiles. Does the original, herbivore-produced elicitor serve as a mobile messenger, triggering whole-plant volatile synthesis? Or are secondary messengers employed to transmit the signal to sites distal to the site of damage? Furthermore, why do herbivores produce compounds that activate plant chemical defenses? What function, if any, do these compounds serve in herbivore metabolism or defense?
The answers to these and similar questions should lead to the development of more effective methods for the biological control of insect pests with natural enemies. It may also lead to the development of new plant varieties with enhanced chemical defenses or to methods of "inoculating" plants with elicitors to increase their resistance to insect pests.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Received May 20, 1999; accepted June 16, 1999.
1 Present address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409.
* Corresponding author; e-mail jtumlinson{at}gainesville.usda.ufl.edu; fax 352-374-5707.
| |
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Glucosidase: an elicitor of herbivore-induced plant odor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
92: 2036-2040
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Singh, I. K. Singh, and P. K. Verma Differential transcript accumulation in Cicer arietinum L. in response to a chewing insect Helicoverpa armigera and defence regulators correlate with reduced insect performance J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2008; 59(9): 2379 - 2392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Effmert, C. Dinse, and B. Piechulla Influence of Green Leaf Herbivory by Manduca sexta on Floral Volatile Emission by Nicotiana suaveolens Plant Physiology, April 1, 2008; 146(4): 1996 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-i. Arimura, S. Kopke, M. Kunert, V. Volpe, A. David, P. Brand, P. Dabrowska, M. E. Maffei, and W. Boland Effects of Feeding Spodoptera littoralis on Lima Bean Leaves: IV. Diurnal and Nocturnal Damage Differentially Initiate Plant Volatile Emission Plant Physiology, March 1, 2008; 146(3): 965 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ulland, E. Ian, R. Mozuraitis, A.-K. Borg-Karlson, R. Meadow, and H. Mustaparta Methyl Salicylate, Identified as Primary Odorant of a Specific Receptor Neuron Type, Inhibits Oviposition by the Moth Mamestra Brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Chem Senses, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 35 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schroder, S. M. Cristescu, F. J. M. Harren, and M. Hilker Reduction of ethylene emission from Scots pine elicited by insect egg secretion J. Exp. Bot., May 1, 2007; 58(7): 1835 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Watkins, T. J. Gianfagna, R. Sun, and W. A. Meyer Volatile Compounds of Tufted Hairgrass Crop Sci., November 21, 2006; 46(6): 2575 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-N. Wei and L. Kang Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of a Parasitic Wasp to Plant Volatiles Induced by Two Leaf Miner Species Chem Senses, June 1, 2006; 31(5): 467 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. CAISSARD, V. BERGOUGNOUX, M. MARTIN, M. MAURIAT, and S. BAUDINO Chemical and Histochemical Analysis of 'Quatre Saisons Blanc Mousseux', a Moss Rose of the Rosa x damascena Group Ann. Bot., February 1, 2006; 97(2): 231 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D'Alessandro and T. C.J. Turlings In Situ Modification of Herbivore-Induced Plant Odors: A Novel Approach to Study the Attractiveness of Volatile Organic Compounds to Parasitic Wasps Chem Senses, November 1, 2005; 30(9): 739 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Svensson, M. O. Hickman Jr, S. Bartram, W. Boland, O. Pellmyr, and R. A. Raguso Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae) Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2005; 92(10): 1624 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mumm and M. Hilker The Significance of Background Odour for an Egg Parasitoid to Detect Plants with Host Eggs Chem Senses, May 1, 2005; 30(4): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mithofer, G. Wanner, and W. Boland Effects of Feeding Spodoptera littoralis on Lima Bean Leaves. II. Continuous Mechanical Wounding Resembling Insect Feeding Is Sufficient to Elicit Herbivory-Related Volatile Emission Plant Physiology, March 1, 2005; 137(3): 1160 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bichao, A.-K. Borg-Karlson, J. Araujo, and H. Mustaparta Five Types of Olfactory Receptor Neurons in the Strawberry Blossom Weevil Anthonomus rubi: Selective Responses to Inducible Host-plant Volatiles Chem Senses, February 1, 2005; 30(2): 153 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Miller, L. L. Madilao, S. Ralph, and J. Bohlmann Insect-Induced Conifer Defense. White Pine Weevil and Methyl Jasmonate Induce Traumatic Resinosis, de Novo Formed Volatile Emissions, and Accumulation of Terpenoid Synthase and Putative Octadecanoid Pathway Transcripts in Sitka Spruce Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 369 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Reymond, N. Bodenhausen, R. M.P. Van Poecke, V. Krishnamurthy, M. Dicke, and E. E. Farmer A Conserved Transcript Pattern in Response to a Specialist and a Generalist Herbivore PLANT CELL, November 1, 2004; 16(11): 3132 - 3147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iijima, R. Davidovich-Rikanati, E. Fridman, D. R. Gang, E. Bar, E. Lewinsohn, and E. Pichersky The Biochemical and Molecular Basis for the Divergent Patterns in the Biosynthesis of Terpenes and Phenylpropenes in the Peltate Glands of Three Cultivars of Basil Plant Physiology, November 1, 2004; 136(3): 3724 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Dudareva, E. Pichersky, and J. Gershenzon Biochemistry of Plant Volatiles Plant Physiology, August 1, 2004; 135(4): 1893 - 1902. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Vuorinen, A.-M. Nerg, M.A. Ibrahim, G.V.P. Reddy, and J. K. Holopainen Emission of Plutella xylostella-Induced Compounds from Cabbages Grown at Elevated CO2 and Orientation Behavior of the Natural Enemies Plant Physiology, August 1, 2004; 135(4): 1984 - 1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chen, D.-K. Ro, J. Petri, J. |