|
|
||||||||
|
Plant Physiology 97:894-899 (1991) © 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists Regulation of 2-Carboxyarabinitol 1-Phosphatase 1Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0076
The regulation of 2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphatase (CA 1-Pase) by phosphorylated effectors was studied with enzyme purified from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. CA 1-Pase activity was most stimulated by fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, exhibiting an A0.5 value of 1.9 millimolar and a 10-fold enhancement of catalysis. With ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, the A0.5 was 0.6 millimolar, and maximal stimulation of activity was 5.3-fold. Among the monophosphates, 3-phosphoglycerate and phosphoglycolate were more potent positive effectors than glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, glucose 1-phosphate, glucose 6-phosphate, and dihydroxyacetone phosphate. Stimulation of CA 1-Pase by ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate increased Vmax but did not appreciably alter Km (2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphate) values. Inorganic phosphate appeared to inhibit CA 1-Pase noncompetitively with respect to 2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphate, exhibiting a Ki of 0.3 millimolar. The results suggest that these positive and negative effectors bind to a regulatory site on CA 1-Pase and may have a physiologial role in the light regulation of this enzyme. Related experiments with CA 1-Pase inactivated by dialysis in the absence of dithiothreitol show that partial reactivation can be achieved in the presence of a range of reducing reagents, including dithiothreitol, cysteine, and reduced glutathione. This could imply an ancillary involvement of sulfhydryl reduction during light activation of CA 1-Pase in vivo. The enzyme was thermally stable up to 35°C, in contrast to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase which lost activity above 30°C. The activation energy for CA 1-Pase was calculated to be 56.14 kilojoules per mole.
1 Supported in part by BRSG SO7 RRO7176 awarded to G.P.H. by the Biomedical Research Grant Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health. We also acknowledge support from the Graduate School and the Plant Molecular Biology Center at Northern Illinois University.
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ASPB Publications | PLANT PHYSIOLOGY | THE PLANT CELL | |
|---|---|---|---|