This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Takahashi, H. Articles by Scott, T. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Takahashi, H. Articles by Scott, T. K. Agricola Articles by Takahashi, H. Articles by Scott, T. K.

Development and Growth Regulation

Hydrotropism and Its Interaction with Gravitropism in Maize Roots ¹

Institute of Genetic Ecology, Tohoku University, Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980, Japan, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599

We have partially characterized root hydrotropism and its interaction with gravitropism in maize (Zea mays L.). Roots of Golden Cross Bantam 70, which require light for orthogravitropism, showed positive hydrotropism; bending upward when placed horizontally below a hydrostimulant (moist cheesecloth) in 85% relative humidity (RH) and in total darkness. However, the light-exposed roots of Golden Cross Bantam 70 or roots of a normal maize cultivar, Burpee Snow Cross, showed positive gravitropism under the same conditions; bending downward when placed horizontally below the hydrostimulant in 85% RH. Light-exposed roots of Golden Cross Bantam 70 placed at 70° below the horizontal plane responded positively hydrotropically, but gravitropism overcame the hydrotropism when the roots were placed at 45° below the horizontal. Roots placed vertically with the tip down in 85% RH bent to the side toward the hydrostimulant in both cultivars, and light conditions did not affect the response. Such vertical roots did not respond when the humidity was maintained near saturation. These results suggest that hydrotropic and gravitropic responses interact with one another depending on the intensity of one or both factors. Removal of the approximately 1.5 millimeter root tip blocked both hydrotropic and gravitropic responses in the two cultivars. However, removal of visible root tip mucilage did not affect hydrotropism or gravitropism in either cultivar.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Kobayashi, A. Takahashi, Y. Kakimoto, Y. Miyazawa, N. Fujii, A. Higashitani, and H. Takahashi From the Cover: A gene essential for hydrotropism in roots PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4724 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. TSUDA, N. MIYAMOTO, H. TAKAHASHI, K. ISHIHARA, and T. HIRASAWA Roots of Pisum sativum L. Exhibit Hydrotropism in Response to a Water Potential Gradient in Vermiculite Ann. Bot., December 1, 2003; 92(6): 767 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Eapen, M. L. Barroso, M. E. Campos, G. Ponce, G. Corkidi, J. G. Dubrovsky, and G. I. Cassab A no hydrotropic response Root Mutant that Responds Positively to Gravitropism in Arabidopsis Plant Physiology, February 1, 2003; 131(2): 536 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Liedgens, A. Soldati, P. Stamp, and W. Richner Root Development of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Observed with Minirhizotrons in Lysimeters Crop Sci., November 1, 2000; 40(6): 1665 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]