Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 95:116-125 (1991)
© 1991 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beall, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beall, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, K. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beall, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Babb, K. H.
Development and Growth Regulation

Genetic Regulation of Development in Sorghum bicolor1

V. The ma3R Allele Results in Gibberellin Enrichment

Frederick D. Beall2, Page W. Morgan, Lewis N. Mander, Frederick R. Miller and Karen H. Babb

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia

Sorghum bicolor genotypes, near isogenic with different alleles at the third maturity locus, were compared for development, for responsiveness to GA3 and a GA synthesis inhibitor, and occurrence and concentrations of endogenous GAs, IAA, and ABA. At 14 days the genotype 58M (ma3Rma3R) exhibited 2.5-fold greater culm height, 1.75-fold greater total height, and 1.38-fold greater dry weight than 90M (ma3ma3) or 100M (Ma3Ma3). All three genotypes exhibited similar shoot elongation in response to GA3, and 58M showed GA3-mediated hastening of floral initiation when harvested at day 18 or 21. Both 90M and 100M had exhibited hastening of floral initiation by GA3 previously, at later application dates. Tetcyclacis reduced height, promoted tillering, and delayed flowering of 58M resulting in plants which were near phenocopies of 90M and 100M. Based on bioassay activity, HPLC retention times, cochromatography with 2H2-labeled standards on capillary column GC and matching mass spectrometer fragmentation patterns (ions [m/z] and relative abundances), GA1, GA19, GA20, GA53, and GA3 were identified in extracts of all three genotypes. In addition, based on published Kovats retention index values and correspondence in ion masses and relative abundances, GA44 and GA17 were detected. Quantitation was based on recovery of coinjected, 2H2-labeled standards. In 14 day-old-plants, total GA-like bioactivity and GA1 concentrations (nanograms GA/gram dry weight) were two- to six-fold higher in 58M than 90M and 100M in leaf blades, apex samples, and whole plants while concentrations in culms were similar. Similar trends occurred if data were expressed on a per plant basis. GA1 concentrations for whole plants were about two-fold higher in 58M than 90M and 100M from day 7 to day 14. Concentrations of ABA and IAA did not vary between the genotypes. The results indicate the mutant allele ma3R causes a two- to six-fold increase in GA1 concentrations, does not result in a GA-receptor or transduction mutation and is associated with phenotypic characteristics that can be enhanced by GA3 and reduced by GA synthesis inhibitor. These observations support the hypothesis that the allele ma3R causes an overproduction of GAs which results in altered leaf morphology, reduced tillering, earlier flowering, and other phenotypic differences between 58M and 90M or 100M.


2 Present address: Forestry Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, P.O. Box 490, Sault St. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7, Canada.

1 A contribution of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station (TAES) paper No. 25548 in the Technical Article Series. Supported by U.S. Department of Agriculture Competitive Grant No. 86-CRCR-1-2005 and TAES.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
T. H. Kebrom, B. L. Burson, and S. A. Finlayson
Phytochrome B Represses Teosinte Branched1 Expression and Induces Sorghum Axillary Bud Outgrowth in Response to Light Signals
Plant Physiology, March 1, 2006; 140(3): 1109 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
G. N. Amzallag
Perturbed reproductive development in salt-treated Sorghum bicolor: a consequence of modifications in regulation networks?
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2005; 56(421): 2821 - 2829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. M. Frantz, D. Pinnock, S. Klassen, and B. Bugbee
Characterizing the Environmental Response of a Gibberellic Acid-Deficient Rice for Use as a Model Crop
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1172 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. A. Blázquez and D. Weigel
Independent Regulation of Flowering by Phytochrome B and Gibberellins in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, August 1, 1999; 120(4): 1025 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
I.-J. Lee, K. R. Foster, and P. W. Morgan
Photoperiod Control of Gibberellin Levels and Flowering in Sorghum
Plant Physiology, March 1, 1998; 116(3): 1003 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Plant Biologists