Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 93:1530-1538 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaminek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaminek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kaminek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, D. J.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Genotypic Variation in Cytokinin Oxidase from Phaseolus Callus Cultures 1

Miroslav Kaminek2 and Donald J. Armstrong

Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2902

Genotypic variation in cytokinin oxidase has been detected in enzyme preparations from Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv Great Northern and Phaseolus lunatus L. cv Kingston callus cultures. Although cytokinin oxidase preparations from Great Northern and Kingston callus tissues appear to have very similar substrate specificities, the cytokinin oxidase activities from the two callus tissues were found to differ in a number of other properties. The cytokinin oxidase from P. vulgaris cv Great Northern callus tissue exhibited a pH optimum of 6.5 (bisTris) and had a strong affinity for the lectin concanavalin A. The cytokinin oxidase from P. lunatus cv Kingston callus tissue exhibited a pH optimum of 8.4 (Taps) and did not bind to concanavalin A. The two enzymes also differed in position of elution when chromatographed on DEAE-cellulose. Both cytokinin oxidase activities exhibited enhanced activity and lower pH optima in the presence of copper-imidazole complexes, but the optimum copper-imidazole ratio and the magnitude of enhancement differed for the two activities. In both callus tissues, transient increases in the supply of exogenous cytokinins induced increases in cytokinin oxidase activity. The differences in pH optima and in glycosylation (as evidenced by the observed difference in lectin affinity) of the cytokinin oxidases from Great Northern and Kingston callus tissues suggest that the compartmentation of cytokinin oxidase may differ in the two callus tissues. The possibility that enzyme compartmentation and isozyme variation in cytokinin oxidase may play a role in the regulation of cytokinin degradation in plant tissues is discussed in relation to known differences in the rates of cytokinin degradation in Great Northern and Kingston callus tissues.


2 Present address: Institute of Experimental Botany, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Ke dvoru 15, 16630 Praha 6, Czechoslovakia.

1 Supported by the Science and Education Administration of the U.S. Department of Agriculture under grant 86-CRCR-1-1988 from the Competitive Research Grants Office.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. LEXA, T. GENKOV, J. MALBECK, I. MACHACKOVA, and B. BRZOBOHATY
Dynamics of Endogenous Cytokinin Pools in Tobacco Seedlings: a Modelling Approach
Ann. Bot., April 1, 2003; 91(5): 585 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. H. Yang, H. Yu, and C. J. Goh
Isolation and characterization of the orchid cytokinin oxidase DSCKX1 promoter
J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2002; 53(376): 1899 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists