Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 93:1482-1485 (1990)
© 1990 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spanu, P.
Right arrow Articles by Boller, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spanu, P.
Right arrow Articles by Boller, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Spanu, P.
Right arrow Articles by Boller, T.
Metabolism and Enzymology

Inactivation of Stress Induced 1-Aminocyclopropane Carboxylate Synthase in Vivo Differs from Substrate-Dependent Inactivation in Vitro1

Pietro Spanu, Georg Felix and Thomas Boller

Botanisches Institut der Universität Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland, Friedrich-Miescher-Institut, P.O. Box 2543, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland

The activity of 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylate (ACC) synthase increased rapidly in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) leaf discs after vacuum infiltration, reached a maximum after about 30 minutes, and subsequently decayed with an apparent half-life of about 20 minutes. Aminoethoxyvinylglycine, a known inhibitor of ACC synthase, did not alter the apparent turnover of ACC synthase in vivo although it efficiently blocked inactivation of the enzyme by its substrate S-adenosylmethionine in vitro. Similar results were obtained, using a novel assay with permeabilized cells, for ACC synthase in tomato cell cultures treated with a fungal elicitor. The results indicate that inactivation of ACC synthase in vivo differs from substrate-dependent inactivation in vitro.


1 Supported in part by grant 31.26492.89 from the Swiss National Science Foundation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant CellHome page
H. S. Chae, F. Faure, and J. J. Kieber
The eto1, eto2, and eto3 Mutations and Cytokinin Treatment Increase Ethylene Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by Increasing the Stability of ACS Protein
PLANT CELL, February 1, 2003; 15(2): 545 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
G. Felix, M. Regenass, and T. Boller
Sensing of Osmotic Pressure Changes in Tomato Cells
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2000; 124(3): 1169 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. P. Vogel, K. E. Woeste, A. Theologis, and J. J. Kieber
Recessive and dominant mutations in the ethylene biosynthetic gene ACS5 of Arabidopsis confer cytokinin insensitivity and ethylene overproduction, respectively
PNAS, April 14, 1998; 95(8): 4766 - 4771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Plant Biologists