Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 91:999-1005 (1989)
© 1989 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerath, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerath, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, S. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gerath, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chisholm, S. W.
Environmental and Stress Physiology

Change in Photosynthetic Capacity over the Cell Cycle in Light/Dark-Synchronized Amphidinium carteri Is Due Solely to the Photocycle 1

Mark W. Gerath2 and Sallie W. Chisholm

48-425 Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Cell cycle dependent photosynthesis in the marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium carteri was studied under constant illumination and light/dark (L/D) photocycles to distinguish intrinsic cell cycle control from environmental influences. Cells were grown in constant light and on a 14:10 L:D cycle at light intensities that would yield a population growth rate of 1 doubling per day. In the former case division was asynchronous, and cells were separated according to cell cycle stage using centrifugal elutriation. Cells grown on the L:D cycle were synchronized, with division restricted to the dark period. Cell cycle stage distributions were quantified by flow cytometry. Various cell age groups from the two populations were compared as to their photosynthetic response (photosynthetic rate versus irradiance) to determine whether or not the response was modulated primarily by cell cycle constraints or the periodic L/D cycle. Cell cycle variation in photosynthetic capacity was found to be determined solely by the L/D cycle; it was not present in cells grown in constant light.


2 Current address: ENSR Consulting and Engineering, 35 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720.

1 Research supported in part by grants OCE-8121270, 8316616, 8421041, and 8614488.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Plant Biologists