Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 82:468-472 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tucci, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tucci, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tucci, M. A.
Articles

Glyphosate Inhibits Photosynthesis and Allocation of Carbon to Starch in Sugar Beet Leaves 1

Donald R. Geiger, Shelly W. Kapitan and Michelle A. Tucci

Department of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469-0001

Application of glyphosate (N-[phosphonomethyl] glycine) to exporting leaves of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) during the day lowered stomatal conductance and carbon fixation. Allocation of newly fixed carbon to foliar starch accumulation was nearly completely inhibited, being decreased by the same amount as net carbon fixation. In contrast, decreasing net carbon fixation in untreated leaves by lowering CO2 concentration caused starch accumulation to decrease, but only in the same proportion as net carbon fixation. Shikimate level increased 50-fold in treated leaves but the elevated rate of carbon accumulation in shikimate was only 4% of the decrease in the rate of starch accumulation. Application of steady state labeling with 14CO2 to exporting leaves confirmed the above changes in carbon metabolism, but revealed no other major daytime differences in the 14C-content of amino acids or other compounds between treated and control leaves. Less 14C accumulated in treated leaves because of decreased fixation, not increased export. The proportion of newly fixed carbon allocated to sucrose increased, maintaining export at the level in control leaves. Returning net carbon exchange to the rate before treatment restored starch accumulation fully and prevented a decrease in export during the subsequent dark period.


1 Supported by grants from Monsanto Agricultural Products Co. and National Science Foundation Grant DMB-8303957 (D. R. G.).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. P. Barbagallo, K. Oxborough, K. E. Pallett, and N. R. Baker
Rapid, Noninvasive Screening for Perturbations of Metabolism and Plant Growth Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. N. Beriault, G. P. Horsman, and M. D. Devine
Phloem Transport of D,L-Glufosinate and Acetyl-L-Glufosinate in Glufosinate-Resistant and -Susceptible Brassica napus
Plant Physiology, October 1, 1999; 121(2): 619 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Plant Biologists