This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nobel, P. S. Articles by Hartsock, T. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nobel, P. S. Articles by Hartsock, T. L. Agricola Articles by Nobel, P. S. Articles by Hartsock, T. L.

Articles

Leaf and Stem CO₂ Uptake in the Three Subfamilies of the Cactaceae ¹

Department of Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024, Laboratory of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024

Net CO₂ uptake over 24-hour periods was examined for the leaves and for the stems of 11 species of cacti representing all three subfamilies. For Pereskia aculeata, Pereskia grandifolia, and Maihuenia poeppigii (subfamily Pereskioideae), all the net shoot CO₂ uptake was by the leaves and during the daytime. In contrast, for the leafless species Carnegiea gigantea, Ferocactus acanthodes, Coryphantha vivipara, and Mammillaria dioica (subfamily Cactoideae), all the shoot net CO₂ uptake was by the stems and at night. Similarly, for leafless Opuntia ficus-indica (subfamily Opuntioideae), all net CO₂ uptake occurred at night. For leafy members of the Opuntioideae (Pereskiopsis porteri, Quiabentia chacoensis, Austrocylindropuntia subulata), at least 88% of the shoot CO₂ uptake over 24 hours was by the leaves and some CO₂ uptake occurred at night. Leaves responded to the instantaneous level of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) during the daytime, as occurs for C₃ plants, whereas nocturnal CO₂ uptake by stems of O. ficus-indica and F. acanthodes responded to the total daily PAR, as occurs for Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants. Thus, under the well-watered conditions employed, the Pereskioideae behaved as C₃ plants, the Cactoideae behaved as CAM plants, and the Opuntioideae exhibited characteristics of both pathways.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Hernandez-Gonzalez and O. B. Villarreal Crassulacean acid metabolism photosynthesis in columnar cactus seedlings during ontogeny: the effect of light on nocturnal acidity accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1344 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Edwards, R. Nyffeler, and M. J. Donoghue Basal cactus phylogeny: implications of Pereskia (Cactaceae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life form Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2005; 92(7): 1177 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Jones, Z. G. Cardon, and A. D. Czaja A phylogenetic view of low-level CAM in Pelargonium (Geraniaceae) Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2003; 90(1): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]