Plant Physiol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 80:1020-1024 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heide, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, L. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heide, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, L. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heide, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, L. T.
Articles

A Semidian Rhythm in the Flowering Response of Pharbitis nil to Far-Red Light

I. Phasing in Relation to the Light-Off Signal

Ola M. Heide1, Rod W. King and Lloyd T. Evans

CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, G.P.O. Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia

Evidence is presented of an endogenous rhythm in flowering response to far-red (FR) irradiation, with a period of about 12 h (hence semidian rhythm), which persists through at least three cycles in constant conditions of continuous light at 27°C and has a marked influence on the flowering response in Pharbitis nil to a subsequent inductive dark period. The phase of the rhythm is not influenced by real time nor by the time from imbibition or from the beginning of the light period. Rather, it is fed forward from the beginning of the FR interruption to the beginning of the inductive dark period. The period of the rhythm is not affected by irradiance but is longer at cooler temperature. When there are two FR interruptions during the preceding light period, it is primarily the later one which determines the phase of the rhythm, although some interactions are evident. There appears to be an abrupt rephasing of the rhythm at the beginning of the inductive dark period. No overt rhythms which could be used as "clock hands" for the semidian rhythm were detected in photosynthesis, stomatal opening, or translocation.


1 Present address: Department of Botany, Agricultural University of Norway, N-1432 AS-NLH, Norway.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Plant Biologists