Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 80:796-797 (1986)
© 1986 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Idso, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Szarek, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Idso, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Szarek, S. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Idso, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Szarek, S. R.
Articles

Growth Response of a Succulent Plant, Agave vilmoriniana, to Elevated CO21

Sherwood B. Idso, Bruce A. Kimball, Michael G. Anderson and Stan R. Szarek

United States Water Conservation Laboratory, Phoenix, Arizona 85040, Department of Botany and Microbiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287

Large (about 200 grams dry weight) and small (about 5 grams dry weight) specimens of the leaf succulent Agave vilmoriniana Berger were grown outdoors at Phoenix, Arizona. Potted plants were maintained in open-top chambers constructed with clear, plastic wall material. Four CO2 concentrations of 350, 560, 675, and 885 microliters per liter were used during two growth periods and two water treatments. Small and large plants were grown for 6 months, while a few large plants were grown for 1 year. Wet-treatment plants received water twice weekly, whereas dry-treatment plants received slightly more water than they would under natural conditions. Plant growth rates in all treatments were significantly different between small and large specimens, but not between 6 month and 1 year large plants. Only the dry-treatment plants exhibited statistically different growth rates between the CO2 treatments. This productivity response was equivalent to a 28% and 3-fold increase when mathematically interpolated between CO2 concentrations of 300 and 600 microliters per liter for large and small plants, respectively.


1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1986 by the American Society of Plant Biologists