Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 76:49-54 (1984)
© 1984 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kruger, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beevers, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kruger, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beevers, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kruger, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Beevers, H.
Articles

Effect of Fructose 2,6-Bisphosphate on the Kinetic Properties of Cytoplasmic Fructose 1,6-Bisphosphatase from Germinating Castor Bean Endosperm 1

Nicholas J. Kruger2 and Harry Beevers

Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064

The cytoplasmic form of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) was purified over 60-fold from germinating castor bean endosperm (Ricinus communis). The kinetic properties of the purified enzyme were studied. The preparation was specific for fructose 1,6-bisphosphate and exhibited optimum activity at pH 7.5. The affinity of the enzyme for fructose 1,6-bisphosphate was reduced by AMP, which was a mixed linear inhibitor. Fructose 2,6-bisphosphate also inhibited FBPase and induced a sigmoid response to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate. The effects of fructose 2,6-bisphosphate were enhanced by low levels of AMP. The latter two compounds interacted synergistically in inhibiting FBPase, and their interaction was enhanced by phosphate which, by itself, had little effect. The enzyme was also inhibited by ADP, ATP, UDP and, to a lesser extent, phosphoenolpyruvate. There was no apparent synergism between UDP, a mixed inhibitor, and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate. Similarly ADP, a predominantly competitive inhibitor, did not interact with fructose 2,6-bisphosphate. Possible roles for fructose 2,6-bisphosphate and the other effectors in regulating FBPase are discussed.


2 Present address: Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6 Canada.

1 Supported by Grant PCM-78-19575 from the United States National Science Foundation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
R. Zhou and L. Cheng
Biochemical Characterization of Cytosolic Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase from Apple (Malus domestica) Leaves
Plant Cell Physiol., July 15, 2004; 45(7): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1984 by the American Society of Plant Biologists