This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tyree, M. T. Articles by Johnson, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tyree, M. T. Articles by Johnson, R. Agricola Articles by Tyree, M. T. Articles by Johnson, R.

Articles

Ultrasonic Acoustic Emissions from the Sapwood of Cedar and Hemlock ¹

An Examination of Three Hypotheses Regarding Cavitations

Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1 Canada

Measurements are reported of ultrasonic acoustic emissions (AEs) measured from sapwood samples of Thuja occidentalis L. and Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr. during air dehydration. The measurements were undertaken to test the following three hypotheses: (a) Each cavitation event produces one ultrasonic AE. (b) Large tracheids are more likely to cavitate than small tracheids. (c) When stem water potentials are >–0.4 MPa, a significant fraction of the water content of sapwood is held by `capillary forces.' The last two hypotheses were recently discussed at length by M. H. Zimmermann. Experimental evidence consistent with all three hypotheses was obtained. The evidence for each hypothesis respectively is: (a) the cumulative number of AEs nearly equals the number of tracheids in small samples; (b) more water is lost per AE event at the beginning of the dehydration process than at the end, and (c) sapwood samples dehydrated from an initial water potential of 0 MPa lost significantly more water before AEs started than lost by samples dehydrated from an initial water potential of about –0.4 MPa. The extra water held by fully hydrated sapwood samples may have been capillary water as defined by Zimmerman.

We also report an improved method for the measurement of the `intensity' of ultrasonic AEs. Intensity is defined here as the area under the positive spikes of the AE signal (plotted as voltage versus time). This method was applied to produce a frequency histogram of the number of AEs versus intensity. A large fraction of the total number of AEs were of low intensity even in small samples (4 mm diameter by 10 mm length). This suggests that the effective `listening distance' for most AEs was less than 5 to 10 mm.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. N. Patek and R. L. Caldwell Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp Odontodactylus scyllarus J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3655 - 3664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Kikuta, P. Hietz, and H. Richter Vulnerability curves from conifer sapwood sections exposed over solutions with known water potentials J. Exp. Bot., September 1, 2003; 54(390): 2149 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Marshall and E. B. Dumbroff Turgor Regulation via Cell Wall Adjustment in White Spruce Plant Physiology, January 1, 1999; 119(1): 313 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text]