This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hart, J. W. Articles by Macdonald, I. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hart, J. W. Articles by Macdonald, I. R. Agricola Articles by Hart, J. W. Articles by Macdonald, I. R.

Articles

Is There a Role for the Apex in Shoot Geotropism?

Department of Botany, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB9 2UD, Scotland, The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, Scotland

Experiments with horizontal etiolated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings supported centrally such that both apical and basal ends are free to react to geostimulus, revealed that the apical end commences curvature 1 to 2 hours earlier than the basal end. The later curvature in the basal region is a consequence of the absence of growth in the initial period rather than merely slower growth. A comparison of zonal growth rates in a vertical and a horizontal seedling confirmed that geostimulus induces a renewal of growth in a region where growth had ceased. Removing the apical half of the hypocotyl showed that the curvature resulting from this growth initiation in the basal region is dependent on attachment to the apical region. Evidence that this dependence is unlikely to be due to energy deficiency is adduced. The prior response of the apical end to geostimulus and the apically dependent later initiation of new growth in the basal region are compatible with the delay inherent in message transport from apex to base and are considered as evidence for apical involvement in the totality of the seedling's georesponse.