Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 72:813-816 (1983)
© 1983 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, C. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Boyer, C. D.
Articles

Immunological Characterization of Maize Starch Branching Enzymes 1

Mary B. Fisher2 and Charles D. Boyer3

Department of Horticulture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802

Highly purified fractions of three starch branching enzymes from developing maize (Zea mays L.) endosperm were used to prepare antisera in rabbits. In double diffusion experiments, no immunoprecipitate was observed when branching enzyme IIa or IIb was tested against branching enzyme I antiserum. No immunoprecipitate was formed when branching enzyme I was tested against branching enzyme IIa or IIb antiserum. Increasing amounts of antisera in the above combinations also failed to inhibit enzyme activity. Branching enzyme IIa antiserum cross-reacted and formed spurs with branching enzyme IIb when compared with branching enzyme IIa antigen. Comparison of branching enzyme IIb antiserum with branching enzyme IIa also resulted in an immunoprecipitate. Increasing levels of branching enzyme IIa antiserum inhibited branching enzyme IIb as did the reciprocal combination. The data indicated that branching enzymes IIa and IIb are immunologically similar while branching enzyme I is distinct. The data supports the classification of starch branching enzymes based on genetic, kinetic, and chromatographic properties.


2 Present address: Department of Horticulture and Landscape Design, Temple University, Ambler Campus, Ambler, PA 19002.

3 Corresponding author.

1 Supported by State funds and by Regional Research Funds, and Funds from Corn Refiners Association, Inc. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Publication No. D-12422/12201-04-83.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
H. Satoh, A. Nishi, K. Yamashita, Y. Takemoto, Y. Tanaka, Y. Hosaka, A. Sakurai, N. Fujita, and Y. Nakamura
Starch-Branching Enzyme I-Deficient Mutation Specifically Affects the Structure and Properties of Starch in Rice Endosperm
Plant Physiology, November 1, 2003; 133(3): 1111 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. R. Whitt, L. M. Wilson, M. I. Tenaillon, B. S. Gaut, and E. S. Buckler IV
Genetic diversity and selection in the maize starch pathway
PNAS, October 1, 2002; 99(20): 12959 - 12962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
A. Nishi, Y. Nakamura, N. Tanaka, and H. Satoh
Biochemical and Genetic Analysis of the Effects of Amylose-Extender Mutation in Rice Endosperm
Plant Physiology, October 1, 2001; 127(2): 459 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1983 by the American Society of Plant Biologists