Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 70:238-243 (1982)
© 1982 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, J.
Right arrow Articles by McMichael, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, J.
Right arrow Articles by McMichael, B. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, J.
Right arrow Articles by McMichael, B. L.
Articles

Effect of Water Stress on Cotton Leaves 1

I. An Electron Microscopic Stereological Study of the Palisade Cells

Jerry Berlin, J. E. Quisenberry, Franklin Bailey, Margaret Woodworth and B. L. McMichael

Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Cotton Research Laboratory, Lubbock, Texas 79401

Palisade cells from fully expanded leaves from irrigated and nonirrigated, field grown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Paymaster 266) were subjected to a microscopic examination to evaluate the effect of water stress on subcellular structures. The water potential difference between the two treatments was 13 bars at the time of sampling. The dimensions of the palisade cells and their density per unit leaf area were determined by light microscopy. Palisade cells from stressed plants had the same diameter, but were taller than their counterparts in irrigated plants. The density of the palisade cells was the same in both treatments as was the fractional volume of the intercellular space. It was concluded that the reduced leaf area observed in the stressed plants resulted primarily from a mitotic sensitivity to water stress. Further, expansion of palisade cells was not inhibited by the stress imposed in this study.

Morphometric analysis of electron micrographs was used to evaluate the subcellular structure of palisade cells from nonstressed and stressed plants. The fractional volumes of cell walls, total cytoplasm, chloroplasts, starch granules, intrachloroplast bodies, mitochondria, peroxisomes, and central vacuoles were determined. The surface densities of grana and stroma lamellae, outer chloroplast membranes, mitochondrial cristae, endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi cisternae were also measured. The number of chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes were determined. These data were expressed as actual volumes, areas, and numbers per palisade cell for each treatment. Palisade cells from stressed plants had thinner cell walls, larger central vacuoles and approximately the same amount of cytoplasm compared to cells from nonstressed plants. Within the cytoplasm, stressed plants had more but smaller chloroplasts with increased grana and stroma lamellae surfaces, larger mithchondria with reduced cristae surfaces, smaller peroxisomes and reduced membrane surfaces of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi cisternae.


1 Supported in part by a grant to J. B. from Cotton, Inc., the research and marketing company representing America's cotton producers.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1982 by the American Society of Plant Biologists