Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Plant Physiology 63:1089-1094 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melamed-Harel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhold, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melamed-Harel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhold, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Melamed-Harel, H.
Right arrow Articles by Reinhold, L.
Articles

Hysteresis in the Responses of Membrane Potential, Membrane Resistance, and Growth Rate to Cyclic Temperature Change 1

Hadassah Melamed-Harel and Leonora Reinhold

a Department of Botany, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Measurements of electrical potential, membrane resistance, and elongation rate have been carried out on the developing pollen tube of Oenothera drummondii.

The plasmalemma potential was observed to be –138 millivolts ± 19 (SD). Approximately 70% of this potential was apparently due to the operation of an electrogenic pump(s). KCN rapidly and reversibly depolarized the potential to about –40 millivolts. Lowering the temperature from 20 to 4 C brought about similar rapid depolarization. The effects of KCN and of temperature were in no degree additive. KCN had only a small effect on membrane resistance. In contrast, the latter was markedly increased by lowering the temperature.

When the pollen tubes were submitted to cyclic temperature changes striking hysteresis effects were observed in the response of all three parameters, membrane potential, resistance, and growth rate. The hysteresis pattern for potential differed from that for resistance but resembled that for growth rate (measured simultaneously on the same pollen tube). The correlation coefficient between potential and growth rate was very high.

The probable relevance to our results of the hysteresis phenomena associated with "clustering" and phase transition in lipids is pointed out. Attention is also drawn to the possible significance of the large difference between the electric potentials at the start of the cooling and heating paths, respectively.

1 The data are taken from a dissertation to be submitted by H. M.-H. to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Plant Biologists