Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 63:1082-1088 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pate, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Layzell, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pate, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Layzell, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pate, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Layzell, D. B.
Articles

Transport of Organic Solutes in Phloem and Xylem of a Nodulated Legume 1

John S. Pate, Craig A. Atkins, Kathy Hamel, David L. McNeil and David B. Layzell

a Department of Botany, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009

Collections of xylem exudate of root stumps or detached nodules, and of phloem bleeding sap from stems, petioles, and fruits were made from variously aged plants of Lupinus albus L. relying on nodules for their N supply. Sucrose was the major organic solute of phloem, asparagine, glutamine, serine, aspartic acid, valine, lysine, isoleucine, and leucine, the principal N solutes of both xylem and phloem. Xylem sap exhibited higher relative proportions of asparagine, glutamine and aspartic acid than phloem sap, but lower proportions of other amino acids. Phloem sap of petioles was less concentrated in asparagine and glutamine but richer in sucrose than was phloem sap of stem and fruit, suggesting that sucrose was unloaded from phloem and amides added to phloem as translocate passed through stems to sinks of the plant. Evidence was obtained of loading of histidine, lysine, threonine, serine, leucine and valine onto phloem of stems but the amounts involved were small compared with amides. Analyses of petiole phloem sap from different age groups of leaves indicated ontogenetic changes and effects of position on a shoot on relative rates of export of sucrose and N solutes. Diurnal fluctuations were demonstrated in relative rates of loading of sucrose and N solutes onto phloem of leaves. Daily variations in the ability of stem tissue to load N onto phloem streams were of lesser amplitude than, or out of phase with fluctuations in translocation of N from leaves. Data were related to recent information on C and N transport in the species.


1 Supported by funds from the Australian Research Grants Committee and the Wheat Industry Research Council of Australia. D. L. McN. acknowledges receipt of a Commonwealth of Australia Post Graduate Research Award, and D. B. L. a studentship from the National Research Council of Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
C. A. Atkins and P. M. C. Smith
Translocation in Legumes: Assimilates, Nutrients, and Signaling Molecules
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 550 - 561.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
N. Munier-Jolain and C. Salon
Can sucrose content in the phloem sap reaching field pea seeds (Pisum sativum L.) be an accurate indicator of seed growth potential?
J. Exp. Bot., November 1, 2003; 54(392): 2457 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
R. Parsons and R. J. Sunley
Nitrogen nutrition and the role of root-shoot nitrogen signalling particularly in symbiotic systems
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2001; 52(90001): 435 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Plant Biologists