This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gertel, E. T. Articles by Green, P. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gertel, E. T. Articles by Green, P. B. Agricola Articles by Gertel, E. T. Articles by Green, P. B.

Articles

Cell Growth Pattern and Wall Microfibrillar Arrangement

Experiments with Nitella

^a Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

In cylindrical cells growing throughout their length, over-all transverse reinforcement of the wall by microfibrils is believed to be required for cell elongation. The multinet theory states that in such cells microfibrils are deposited at the inner surface of the wall with transverse orientation and are then passively reoriented toward the longitudinal direction by the predominant longitudinal strain (surface expension). In the present study young Nitella cells were physically forced to grow in highly abnormal patterns: in length only, in girth only, or with localized suppression of growth. Subsequent gradients of microfibrillar arrangement within the wall cross-section were measured with polarized light and interference microscopes. The novel wall structures produced were in all cases explainable by passive reorientation, i.e. by the multinet theory. The study also showed that orientation of synthesis remains insensitive to several of the physical manipulations that strongly influence the passive behavior of wall microfibrils. Only the localized complete suppression of surface growth led to the deposition of nontransverse cellulose. These results suggest that the presence of strain is needed for continued oriented synthesis, but that the directional aspect of strain is not an "instructional" agent continuously guiding the orientation of synthesis, once this orientation has been established.

² Supported by National Science Foundation Grant BMX 73-01459-A01. To whom reprint requests should be sent.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Kwiatkowska Structural integration at the shoot apical meristem: models, measurements, and experiments Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2004; 91(9): 1277 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. DONALD, F. S. BAKER, A. C. SMITH, and K. W. WALDRON Fracture of Plant Tissues and Walls as Visualized by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy Ann. Bot., July 1, 2003; 92(1): 73 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Gardiner, J. D. I. Harper, N. D. Weerakoon, D. A. Collings, S. Ritchie, S. Gilroy, R. J. Cyr, and J. Marc A 90-kD Phospholipase D from Tobacco Binds to Microtubules and the Plasma Membrane PLANT CELL, September 1, 2001; 13(9): 2143 - 2158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Whittaker and B. A. Triplett Gene-Specific Changes in alpha -Tubulin Transcript Accumulation in Developing Cotton Fibers Plant Physiology, September 1, 1999; 121(1): 181 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. D. Fisher and R. J. Cyr Extending the Microtubule/Microfibril Paradigm . Cellulose Synthesis Is Required for Normal Cortical Microtubule Alignment in Elongating Cells Plant Physiology, March 1, 1998; 116(3): 1043 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text]