This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ridley, S. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ridley, S. M. Agricola Articles by Ridley, S. M.

Articles

Interaction of Chloroplasts with Inhibitors

Induction of Chlorosis by Diuron During Prolonged Illumination in Vitro

¹ Biochemistry Section, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 6EY, England

A primary symptom of diuron (DCMU) phytotoxicity in plants is the destruction of chlorophyll. To study this process in vitro, chloroplasts from pea leaves (Pisum sativum L.) have been incubated in the light with DCMU for periods of up to 34 hours. The sequence of photodestruction of chlorophylls and carotenoids has been followed to try and establish the nature of the chloroplast protection mechanisms that are destroyed by DCMU. -Carotene decays most rapidly, followed by chlorophyll a and xanthophylls which are destroyed in a constant ratio, followed finally by chlorophyll b. Bypassing the DCMU block in the electron transport system with an artificial electron donor provides complete protection against chlorophyll and carotenoid photodestruction. The same protection by this electron donor system is afforded to stroma-free lamellae from which soluble reductants have been removed so that NADPH formation, which has been proposed as an essential part of a protective xanthophyll cycle, is not possible. Both this and the simultaneous loss of chlorophyll a and xanthophylls tend to preclude the breakdown of a xanthophyll cycle from the possible protective mechanisms inhibited or destroyed by DCMU.

Cofactors of cyclic electron transport also protect against DCMU-induced photodestruction of pigments. Their concentration dependence for this protection appears to reflect their various abilities to catalyze cyclic photophosphorylation. The extent to which the chlorophylls are destroyed in the major pigment-protein complexes from chloroplasts illuminated with and without DCMU has been measured. In the absence of DCMU, the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complex is destroyed most rapidly. In the presence of DCMU, the losses of chlorophyll a from the photosystem I P700-chlorophyll a protein and the chlorophyll a/b complex are about the same. Chlorophyll losses are matched by simultaneous losses of the protein moieties; spectral analyses show that the remaining chlorophyll a is held in a loose association with the protein. Phenazine methosulfate protects the chlorophyll of the light-harvesting complex in DCMU-treated chloroplasts more than it protects that in photosystem I. Data published on DCMU-induced fluorescence and its quenching are used to interpret the longer term DCMU-induced chlorosis and its protection. By blocking electron transport, conformational changes in the membrane that allow spillover of excitation energy from photosystem II to photosystem I (and quenching of fluorescence by this means) are prevented. The mechanism that normally protects the chloroplast against excessive illumination is then overloaded which impairs the harmless dissipation of absorbed light energy; consequently, the pigments are destroyed. When photosystem I is allowed to function again through cyclic electron flow, a necessary conformational change is believed to be reintroduced that once again allows the harmless dissipation of excitation energy through spillover. A functional electron transport system associated with photosystem I will protect against DCMU-induced chlorosis when the thylakoid membranes are intact, but when the P700-chlorophyll a protein complex is in isolation, there is only a limited degree of protection.