Plant Physiol. Drug Metab Dispos
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 59:354-356 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roark, B.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roark, B.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roark, B.
Right arrow Articles by Quisenberry, J. E.
Articles

Environmental and Genetic Components of Stomatal Behavior in Two Genotypes of Upland Cotton 1

Bruce Roark and J. E. Quisenberry

a Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Lubbock, Texas 79401

Two parental lines of Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plus their reciprocal F1, F2, and backcross populations were field-tested for environmental and genetic components of leaf diffusive resistance. Leaf resistance was measured with a diffusion porometer three times each day during 6 days in August. A large, consistent environmental component was present during the morning, afternoon, and evening, but the genetic component appeared mainly during the afternoon. Leaf water potential indicated that afternoon was the period of highest water stress. Genetic analyses revealed that leaf resistance was associated with both additive and dominance genetic variances, with an estimated narrow sense heritability of 25%. High leaf resistance was completely dominant to low resistance.


1 This work was undertaken in cooperation with The Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
J. J. Burke
Evaluation of Source Leaf Responses to Water-Deficit Stresses in Cotton Using a Novel Stress Bioassay
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2007; 143(1): 108 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Plant Biologists