Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 59:10-14 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Potter, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, J. W.
Articles

Leaf Area Partitioning as an Important Factor in Growth

John R. Pottera,1

James W. Jonesb

a Southern Weed Science Laboratory, ,2 Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, Cotton Production Institute, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762

Despite continuing efforts to correlate unit area rates of photosynthesis of crop varieties with growth rates, there has been little or no success. It is reasonable to assume that partitioning of photosynthate into new leaf area is an important component of growth. Accordingly, an expression was developed to measure leaf area partitioning. Using growth analysis techniques, relative growth rates were compared to net assimilation rates, partitioning of daily weight gain into new leaf area, and partitioning of daily weight gain into new leaf weight of nine species grown in growth chambers under three temperature regimes. Day/night temperatures of 21/10, 32/21, and 38/27 C caused large differences in relative growth rates. Relative growth rates were closely correlated with leaf area partitioning in seven of the nine species, but were inversely correlated with leaf weight partitioning for six of the nine species. Relative growth rates were poorly correlated with net assimilation rates for five of the nine species. The product of net assimilation rate times leaf area partitioning is shown to be equal to the relative leaf area expansion rate.

These results indicate that growth responses due to temperature shifts were more sensitive to changes in leaf area partitioning or relative leaf area expansion rates than to net assimilation rates. Because changes in leaf area partitioning or relative leaf area expansion rates can have an effect on relative growth rates that overshadow changes in net assimilation rates, and because net assimilation rates are largely a function of unit area rates of photosynthesis, the correlation of unit area rates of photosynthesis with growth should include consideration of leaf area partitioning or relative leaf area expansion rates.


1 Present address: Ornamental Plants Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Corvallis, Oregon 97330.

2 Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station cooperating.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
O. K. Atkin, B. R. Loveys, L. J. Atkinson, and T. L. Pons
Phenotypic plasticity and growth temperature: understanding interspecific variability
J. Exp. Bot., January 1, 2006; 57(2): 267 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. J. Boote, J. W. Jones, W. D. Batchelor, E. D. Nafziger, and O. Myers
Genetic Coefficients in the CROPGRO-Soybean Model: Links to Field Performance and Genomics
Agron. J., January 1, 2003; 95(1): 32 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. W. Kennedy and R. L. Hutchinson
Cotton Growth and Development under Different Tillage Systems
Crop Sci., July 1, 2001; 41(4): 1162 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
F. S. Xiong, E. C. Mueller, and T. A. Day
Photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation and growth response of Antarctic vascular plants to contrasting temperature regimes
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2000; 87(5): 700 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. L. Marzola and D. P. Bartholomew
Photosynthetic Pathway and Biomass Energy Production
Science, August 10, 1979; 205(4406): 555 - 559.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Plant Biologists