This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nicholas, J. C. Articles by Hageman, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nicholas, J. C. Articles by Hageman, R. H. Agricola Articles by Nicholas, J. C. Articles by Hageman, R. H.

Articles

Nitrate Reductase Activity in Soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)

II. Energy Limitations ¹

^a United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, and Department of Agronomy, Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Growth chamber studies with soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) were designed to determine the relative limitations of NO₃^–, NADH, and nitrate reductase (NR) per se on nitrate metabolism as affected by light and temperature. Three NR enzyme assays (+NO₃^–in vivo, –NO₃^–in vivo, and in vitro) were compared. NR activity decreased with all assays when plants were exposed to dark. Addition of NO₃^– to the in vivo NR assay medium increased activity (over that of the –NO₃^–in vivo assay) at all sampling periods of a normal day-night sequence (14 hr-30 C day; 10 hr-20 C night), indicating that NO₃^– was rate-limiting. The stimulation of in vivo NR activity by NO₃^– was not seen in plants exposed to extended dark periods at elevated temperatures (16 hr-30 C), indicating that under those conditions, NO₃^– was not the limiting factor. Under the latter condition, in vitro NR activity was appreciable (19 µmol NO₂^– [g fresh weight, hr]^–1) suggesting that enzyme level per se was not the limiting factor and that reductant energy might be limiting.

The addition of NADH to the in vivo NR assay medium did not stimulate NR activity, although it was not established that NADH entered the tissue. The addition of glucose, fructose 1,6-diphosphate, pyruvate, citrate, succinate, or malate to the in vivo assay medium significantly increased measurable NR activity of leaf tissue from plants pretreated to extended dark periods at elevated temperature. Glucose additions were most effective, usually stimulating increases 2- to 3-fold greater than the other metabolites. Increased NR activities from the various additives were attributed to production of NADH. The loss of in vivo NR activity in soybeans during darkness appeared to be due to the combination of a net loss of enzyme per se and energy depletion. The subsequent light stimulation of NR activity was likely due to increased availability of reductant energy as well as a net synthesis of the NR enzyme.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Aslam, R.L. Travis, and D.W. Rains Diurnal Fluctuations of Nitrate Uptake and In Vivo Nitrate Reductase Activity in Pima and Acala Cotton Crop Sci., March 1, 2001; 41(2): 372 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]