Plant Physiol.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 49:700-703 (1972)
© 1972 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Safir, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gerdemann, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Safir, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gerdemann, J. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Safir, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gerdemann, J. W.
Articles

Nutrient Status and Mycorrhizal Enhancement of Water Transport in Soybean 1

G. R. Safir2, J. S. Boyer and J. W. Gerdemann

a Department of Plant Pathology and Department of Botany, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Mycorrhizal soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. var. Harosoy-63) plants have lower resistances to water transport than nonmy-corrhizal plants after 4.5 weeks of growth. Although resistances of whole plants differ by 40%, there were no differences in the resistances of stems plus leaves, indicating that the major effect of the mycorrhizae was to reduce the resistance of the roots. Since the fungitoxicant, p-chloronitrobenzene, had no effect on resistances to water transport, reduced resistances were probably not caused by a direct modification of the transport pathway by the fungus. Differences in resistance between mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal soybean were essentialy eliminated by the application of nutrients to the soil. Thus, lowered resistances of mycorrhizal roots growing in soil with low levels of nutrients probably resulted from the enhanced nutrient status of the plant brought about by the fungus. Mycorrhizal infection increased growth at both low and high nutrient levels.


2 Present address: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich. 48823.

1 This work was supported in part by Grant B-036-I11 from the Office of Water Resources Research, United States Department of Interior.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Murillo-Williams and P. Pedersen
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization Response to Three Seed-Applied Fungicides
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 795 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
M. F. Allen
Mycorrhizal Fungi: Highways for Water and Nutrients in Arid Soils
Vadose Zone J., May 17, 2007; 6(2): 291 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Plant Biologists