Plant Physiol. Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 49:146-154 (1972)
© 1972 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hageman, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hageman, R. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hageman, R. H.
Articles

Canopy and Seasonal Profiles of Nitrate Reductase in Soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) 1

J. E. Harpera

R. H. Hagemanb

a Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Urbana, Illinois 61801, b Department of Agronomy, Illinois Agriculture Experiment Station, Urbana, Illinois 61801

Nitrate reductase activity of soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.) was evaluated in soil plots and outdoor hydroponic gravel culture systems throughout the growing season. Nitrate reductase profiles within the plant canopy were also established. Mean activity per gram fresh weight per hour of the entire plant canopy was highest in the seedling stage while total activity (activity per gram fresh weight per hour times the total leaf weight) reached a maximum when plants were in the full bloom to midpod fill stage. Nitrate reductase activity per gram fresh weight per hour was highest in the uppermost leaf just prior to full expansion and declined with leaf position lower in the canopy. Total nitrate reductase activity per leaf was also highest in the upper-most fully expanded leaf during early growth stages. Maximum total activity shifted to leaf positions lower in the plant canopy with later growth stages.

Nitrate reductase activity of soybeans grown in hydroponic systems was significantly higher than activity of adjacent soil grown plants at later growth stages, which suggested that under normal field conditions the potential for nitrate utilization may not be realized. Nitrate reductase activity per gram fresh weight per hour and nitrate content were positively correlated over the growing season with plants grown in either soil or solution culture. Computations based upon the nitrate reductase assay of plants grown in hydroponics indicated that from 1.7 to 1.8 grams N could have been supplied to the plant via the nitrate reductase process. The harvested seed contained 1.1 to 1.2 grams N per plant. Thus, based on previous estimates of approximately 32% of the final N distribution being in the vegetative plant parts, the estimated input of reduced nitrogen via the enzyme assay was in agreement with the actual N accumulation.

The amount of calculated N2-fixation by nodules per season with plants grown in hydroponics was less than 2% of the computed nitrate reduced via leaf nitrate reductase. Thus, the level of nitrate in the nutrient solution appeared to be quite inhibitory to N2-fixation.


1 Cooperative investigations of the Plant Science Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, and Illinois Agriculture Experiment Station. Publication No. 690, of the United States Regional Soybean Laboratory, Urbana, Ill. This investigation was supported in part by CSRS Grant 016-15-18.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. W. F. Hardy and U. D. Havelka
Nitrogen Fixation Research: A Key to World Food?
Science, May 9, 1975; 188(4188): 633 - 643.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Plant Biologists