Plant Physiology 47:423-430 (1971)
© 1971 American Society of Plant Biologists
Articles
Metabolic and Physical Control of Cell Elongation Rate
In Vivo Studies in Nitella1
P. B. Green2,
R. O. Erickson and
J. Buggy
a Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Several levels of control of elongation rate are revealed through the detailed study of responses of the Nitella internode to abrupt shifts in turgor. The immediate response, which apparently reflects the physical state of the cell, is approximately described by the equation r = (P — Y)m where r is rate, P is pressure, Y is the wall's yielding threshold, and m is related to the wall's apparent fluidity (reciprocal viscosity). Because P and Y are in the range 5 to 6 atmospheres, and (P — Y) is roughly 0.2 atmosphere, elongation rate is initially extremely sensitive to changes in P. A small step-down in turgor (0.7 atmosphere) stops growth, and a similar rise greatly accelerates it. These initial responses are, however, soon (15 minutes) compensated by changes in Y. An apparent metabolism-dependent reaction (azide-sensitive) lowers Y; strain hardening (azide-insensitive) raises it. These two opposing processes, acting on Y, serve as a governor on (P — Y), tending to maintain it at a given value despite changes in P. This ability to compensate is itself a function of turgor. Turgor step-downs are less and less well compensated, leading to lower rate, as turgor falls from 5 atmospheres to about 2 atmospheres where growth appears not to resume. This is the lowest attainable yield value, Y1. The turgor dependency of compensation reflects a turgor requirement of the Y-lowering ("wall-softening") process. Thus the relation between steady state, rs, and turgor is an indirect one, derived from time-dependent alterations of the cell wall. This relationship superficially resembles the instantaneously valid one in that, roughly, rs = (P — Y1)ms. Y1 and ms, however, have much lower values than Y and m. The duality of the elongation rate versus turgor relation and the prominent role of Y in regulating rate are the major features of growth control in Nitella.
2 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. 94305.
1 Supported by National Science Foundation Grant GB 6055X.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
L. Dupuy, J. Mackenzie, T. Rudge, and J. Haseloff
A System for Modelling Cell-Cell Interactions during Plant Morphogenesis
Ann. Bot.,
May 1, 2008;
101(8):
1255 - 1265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Wei and P. M. Lintilhac
Loss of Stability: A New Look at the Physics of Cell Wall Behavior during Plant Cell Growth
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2007;
145(3):
763 - 772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Proseus and J. S. Boyer
Identifying cytoplasmic input to the cell wall of growing Chara corallina
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2006;
57(12):
3231 - 3242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Maggio, J.-K. Zhu, P. M. Hasegawa, and R. A. Bressan
Osmogenetics: Aristotle to Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
July 1, 2006;
18(7):
1542 - 1557.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. I. Solari and T. M. DeJong
The effect of root pressurization on water relations, shoot growth, and leaf gas exchange of peach (Prunus persica) trees on rootstocks with differing growth potential and hydraulic conductance
J. Exp. Bot.,
June 1, 2006;
57(9):
1981 - 1989.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Génard, S. Fishman, G. Vercambre, J.-G. Huguet, C. Bussi, J. Besset, and R. Habib
A Biophysical Analysis of Stem and Root Diameter Variations in Woody Plants
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2001;
126(1):
188 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Inada and T. Shimmen
Involvement of Cortical Microtubules in Plastic Extension Regulated by Gibberellin in Lemna minor Root
Plant Cell Physiol.,
April 1, 2001;
42(4):
395 - 403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Proseus, G.-L. Zhu, and J. S. Boyer
Turgor, temperature and the growth of plant cells: using Chara corallina as a model system
J. Exp. Bot.,
September 1, 2000;
51(350):
1481 - 1494.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. Proseus, J. K.E. Ortega, and J. S. Boyer
Separating Growth from Elastic Deformation during Cell Enlargement
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 1999;
119(2):
775 - 784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Bogoslavsky and P. M. Neumann
Rapid Regulation by Acid pH of Cell Wall Adjustment and Leaf Growth in Maize Plants Responding to Reversal of Water Stress
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 1998;
118(2):
701 - 709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. DESCHAMP and T. J. COOKE
Leaf Dimorphism in Aquatic Angiosperms: Significance of Turgor Pressure and Cell Expansion
Science,
February 4, 1983;
219(4584):
505 - 507.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
