Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 44:1706-1711 (1969)
© 1969 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perkins, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perkins, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Perkins, J. H.
Articles

Morphogenesis in Schizophyllum commune. I. Effects of White Light 1

John H. Perkins2

a Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Reproductive differentiation in the basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune Fr. is initiated by plasmogamy and reciprocal nuclear migration and is terminated by the production of basidiospores. The work reported here has analyzed several factors that affect 2 sequential steps in reproductive differentiation: A) the formation of aggregated masses of cells, and B) the subsequent differentiation of fruiting bodies. The 2 steps are both photosensitive: A) light accelerates the formation of aggregated masses of cells; B) a short exposure of light induces nonaggregated dikaryotic cells to form mature fruiting bodies in the dark.

Cultures of dikaryotic mycelia showed little or no response to light during approximately the first 60 hr of growth. Subsequent to this time, they were photosensitive. Several properties of the photoinduction of fruiting bodies were established in studies utilizing white fluorescent light. (1) The morphogenetic response (fruiting) was approximately linear with the amount of light delivered at low intensities; higher intensities elicited no further response. (2) The photoresponse did not vary when replicate cultures were irradiated at temperatures of 2°, 24°, or 35°. (3) The induction of fruiting bodies by light is disrupted by post-induction heat-exposures of 50° for 1 hr or longer. (4) Photoinduced fruiting bodies formed in distinctive rings on the mycelia and thus suggested that cells of different ages differ in their ability to be photoinduced.


2 Present address: 49 Francesca Avenue, Somerville, Massachusetts 02144.

1 This work was supported by predoctoral fellowships from the National Science Foundation and from the National Institutes of Health.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
K. Yamagishi, T. Kimura, M. Suzuki, and H. Shinmoto
Suppression of fruit-body formation by constitutively active G-protein {alpha}-subunits ScGP-A and ScGP-C in the homobasidiomycete Schizophyllum commune
Microbiology, September 1, 2002; 148(9): 2797 - 2809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D Bell-Pedersen, J C Dunlap, and J J Loros
The Neurospora circadian clock-controlled gene, ccg-2, is allelic to eas and encodes a fungal hydrophobin required for formation of the conidial rodlet layer.
Genes & Dev., December 1, 1992; 6(12a): 2382 - 2394.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Plant Biologists