Plant Physiol. Bio-Rad Microplate Reader
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Plant Physiology 41:792-796 (1966)
© 1966 American Society of Plant Biologists

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, H.
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, H.
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, H.
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, J.
Articles

Interrelations Between Photoperiod, Frost Hardiness and Sulfhydryl Groups in Cabbage 1

Hubertus Kohn and J. Levitt

Botany Department, University of Missouri, Columbia

Hardening of SD (8 and 12 hrs) and LD (18- and 24-hr photoperiods) cabbage plants in stages at temperatures starting with + 5° and ending with – 3° led to the following changes:

Soluble protein plus nonprotein N showed a net increase only in the SD plants. In both SD and LD plants, it decreased to a minimum toward the end of the first stage of hardening, increased to a maximum in the second stage. The degree of this change was proportional to the photoperiod. These changes were mainly due to the proteins.

As in previous investigations, SH content rose during the first 1 to 2 weeks, but only in the SD plants. This rise was primarily due to the protein fraction. After the first 1 to 2 weeks both SD and LD plants showed a decrease in SH content, most pronouncedly during the second stage of hardening.

Nonprotein SH content was very low and decreased during hardening in both SD and LD plants. Nonprotein SS increased during the first stage of hardening. Total nonprotein SH+2SS rose to a maximum during the first stage of hardening, paralleling both osmotic potential and hardiness. During the second stage the total decreased, in spite of the rise in hardiness. These results held true for both SD and LD plants.

These results are all explainable on the basis of the SH{rightleftharpoons}SS theory of frost resistance.


1 This investigation was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant (NSF GB-230).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1966 by the American Society of Plant Biologists