Plant Physiol. email content delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laquel, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castroviejo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laquel, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castroviejo, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Laquel, P.
Right arrow Articles by Castroviejo, M.

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY , Vol 102, Issue 1 107-114, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Plant Biologists


METABOLISM AND ENZYMOLOGY

Mammalian Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Stimulates the Processivity of Two Wheat Embryo DNA Polymerases

P. Laquel, S. Litvak and M. Castroviejo
Institut de Biochimie Cellulaire du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1 rue Camille Saint Saens, 33077 Bordeaux Cedex, France

Multiple DNA polymerases have been described in all organisms studied to date. Their specific functions are not easy to determine, except when powerful genetic and/or biochemical tools are available. However, the processivity of a DNA polymerase could reflect the physiological role of the enzyme. In this study, analogies between plant and animal DNA polymerases have been investigated by analyzing the size of the products synthesized by wheat DNA polymerases A, B, CI, and CII as a measure of their processivity. Thus, incubations have been carried out with poly(dA)-oligo(dT) as a template-primer under varying assay conditions. In the presence of MgCl2, DNA polymerase A was highly processive, whereas DNA polymerases B, CI, and CII synthesized much shorter products. With MnCl2 instead of MgCl2, DNA polymerase A was highly processive, DNA polymerases B and CII were moderately processive, and DNA polymerase CI remained strictly distributive. The effect of calf thymus proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) on wheat polymerases was studied as described for animal DNA polymerases. The high processivity of DNA polymerase A was PCNA independent, whereas both enzyme activity and processivity of wheat DNA polymerases B and CII were significantly stimulated by PCNA. On the other hand, DNA polymerase CI was not stimulated by PCNA and, like animal DNA polymerase [beta], was distributive in all cases. From these results, we propose that wheat DNA polymerase A could correspond to a DNA polymerase [alpha], DNA polymerases B and CII could correspond to the [delta]-like enzyme, and DNA polymerase CI could correspond to DNA polymerase [beta].


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Kimura, Y. Uchiyama, N. Kasai, S. Namekawa, A. Saotome, T. Ueda, T. Ando, T. Ishibashi, M. Oshige, T. Furukawa, et al.
A novel DNA polymerase homologous to Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I from a higher plant, rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2002; 30(7): 1585 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
A. Li, D. Schuermann, F. Gallego, I. Kovalchuk, and B. Tinland
Repair of Damaged DNA by Arabidopsis Cell Extract
PLANT CELL, January 1, 2002; 14(1): 263 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. L. Setter and B. A. Flannigan
Water deficit inhibits cell division and expression of transcripts involved in cell proliferation and endoreduplication in maize endosperm
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2001; 52(360): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ASPB Publications PLANT PHYSIOLOGY THE PLANT CELL
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Plant Biologists